* [PATCH] bpf: fix memory constraint of ldx/stx instructions [PR108790]
@ 2023-02-14 19:51 David Faust
2023-02-14 22:33 ` Jose E. Marchesi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Faust @ 2023-02-14 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
In some cases where the target memory address for an ldx or stx
instruction could be reduced to a constant, GCC could emit a malformed
instruction like:
ldxdw %r0,0
Rather than the expected form:
ldxdw %rX, [%rY + OFFSET]
This is due to the constraint allowing a const_int operand, which the
output templates do not handle.
Fix it by introducing a new memory constraint for the appropriate
operands of these instructions, which is identical to 'm' except that
it does not accept const_int.
Tested with bpf-unknown-none, no known regressions.
OK?
Thanks.
gcc/
PR target/108790
* config/bpf/constraints.md (q): New memory constraint.
* config/bpf/bpf.md (zero_extendhidi2): Use it here.
(zero_extendqidi2): Likewise.
(zero_extendsidi2): Likewise.
(*mov<MM:mode>): Likewise.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/108790
* gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c: New test.
---
gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md | 10 +++++-----
gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md | 11 +++++++++++
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c | 12 ++++++++++++
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c
diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
index d9af98384ef..f6be0a21234 100644
--- a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
+++ b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ (define_insn "xor<AM:mode>3"
(define_insn "zero_extendhidi2"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r,r")
- (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:HI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,r,m")))]
+ (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:HI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,r,q")))]
""
"@
and\t%0,0xffff
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ (define_insn "zero_extendhidi2"
(define_insn "zero_extendqidi2"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r,r")
- (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,r,m")))]
+ (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,r,q")))]
""
"@
and\t%0,0xff
@@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ (define_insn "zero_extendqidi2"
(define_insn "zero_extendsidi2"
[(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r")
(zero_extend:DI
- (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,m")))]
+ (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,q")))]
""
"@
* return bpf_has_alu32 ? \"mov32\t%0,%1\" : \"mov\t%0,%1\;and\t%0,0xffffffff\";
@@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ (define_expand "mov<MM:mode>"
}")
(define_insn "*mov<MM:mode>"
- [(set (match_operand:MM 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r, r,r,m,m")
- (match_operand:MM 1 "mov_src_operand" " m,rI,B,r,I"))]
+ [(set (match_operand:MM 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r, r,r,q,q")
+ (match_operand:MM 1 "mov_src_operand" " q,rI,B,r,I"))]
""
"@
ldx<mop>\t%0,%1
diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md b/gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md
index c8a65cfcddb..33f9177b8eb 100644
--- a/gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md
+++ b/gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md
@@ -29,3 +29,14 @@ (define_constraint "B"
(define_constraint "S"
"A constant call address."
(match_code "const,symbol_ref,label_ref,const_int"))
+
+;;
+;; Memory constraints.
+;;
+
+; Just like 'm' but disallows const_int.
+; Used for ldx[b,h,w,dw] and stx[b,h,w,dw] instructions.
+(define_memory_constraint "q"
+ "Memory reference which is not a constant integer."
+ (and (match_code "mem")
+ (match_test "GET_CODE(XEXP(op, 0)) != CONST_INT")))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..0985ea3e6ac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c
@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+/* Verify that we do not generate a malformed ldxdw instruction
+ with a constant instead of register + offset. */
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldxdw\t%r.,\\\[%r.+0\\\]" 1 } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "ldxdw\t%r.,\[0-9\]+" } } */
+
+unsigned long long test () {
+ return *((unsigned long long *) 0x4000);
+}
--
2.39.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bpf: fix memory constraint of ldx/stx instructions [PR108790]
2023-02-14 19:51 [PATCH] bpf: fix memory constraint of ldx/stx instructions [PR108790] David Faust
@ 2023-02-14 22:33 ` Jose E. Marchesi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jose E. Marchesi @ 2023-02-14 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Faust via Gcc-patches; +Cc: David Faust
Hi David.
> In some cases where the target memory address for an ldx or stx
> instruction could be reduced to a constant, GCC could emit a malformed
> instruction like:
>
> ldxdw %r0,0
>
> Rather than the expected form:
>
> ldxdw %rX, [%rY + OFFSET]
>
> This is due to the constraint allowing a const_int operand, which the
> output templates do not handle.
>
> Fix it by introducing a new memory constraint for the appropriate
> operands of these instructions, which is identical to 'm' except that
> it does not accept const_int.
>
> Tested with bpf-unknown-none, no known regressions.
> OK?
OK. Thanks for the patch.
> Thanks.
>
> gcc/
>
> PR target/108790
> * config/bpf/constraints.md (q): New memory constraint.
> * config/bpf/bpf.md (zero_extendhidi2): Use it here.
> (zero_extendqidi2): Likewise.
> (zero_extendsidi2): Likewise.
> (*mov<MM:mode>): Likewise.
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> PR target/108790
> * gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c: New test.
> ---
> gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md | 10 +++++-----
> gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md | 11 +++++++++++
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
> index d9af98384ef..f6be0a21234 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/bpf/bpf.md
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ (define_insn "xor<AM:mode>3"
>
> (define_insn "zero_extendhidi2"
> [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r,r")
> - (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:HI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,r,m")))]
> + (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:HI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,r,q")))]
> ""
> "@
> and\t%0,0xffff
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ (define_insn "zero_extendhidi2"
>
> (define_insn "zero_extendqidi2"
> [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r,r")
> - (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,r,m")))]
> + (zero_extend:DI (match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,r,q")))]
> ""
> "@
> and\t%0,0xff
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ (define_insn "zero_extendqidi2"
> (define_insn "zero_extendsidi2"
> [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r,r")
> (zero_extend:DI
> - (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,m")))]
> + (match_operand:SI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,q")))]
> ""
> "@
> * return bpf_has_alu32 ? \"mov32\t%0,%1\" : \"mov\t%0,%1\;and\t%0,0xffffffff\";
> @@ -302,8 +302,8 @@ (define_expand "mov<MM:mode>"
> }")
>
> (define_insn "*mov<MM:mode>"
> - [(set (match_operand:MM 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r, r,r,m,m")
> - (match_operand:MM 1 "mov_src_operand" " m,rI,B,r,I"))]
> + [(set (match_operand:MM 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=r, r,r,q,q")
> + (match_operand:MM 1 "mov_src_operand" " q,rI,B,r,I"))]
> ""
> "@
> ldx<mop>\t%0,%1
> diff --git a/gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md b/gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md
> index c8a65cfcddb..33f9177b8eb 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/bpf/constraints.md
> @@ -29,3 +29,14 @@ (define_constraint "B"
> (define_constraint "S"
> "A constant call address."
> (match_code "const,symbol_ref,label_ref,const_int"))
> +
> +;;
> +;; Memory constraints.
> +;;
> +
> +; Just like 'm' but disallows const_int.
> +; Used for ldx[b,h,w,dw] and stx[b,h,w,dw] instructions.
> +(define_memory_constraint "q"
> + "Memory reference which is not a constant integer."
> + (and (match_code "mem")
> + (match_test "GET_CODE(XEXP(op, 0)) != CONST_INT")))
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..0985ea3e6ac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/bpf/ldxdw.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* Verify that we do not generate a malformed ldxdw instruction
> + with a constant instead of register + offset. */
> +
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "ldxdw\t%r.,\\\[%r.+0\\\]" 1 } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "ldxdw\t%r.,\[0-9\]+" } } */
> +
> +unsigned long long test () {
> + return *((unsigned long long *) 0x4000);
> +}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-14 22:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-14 19:51 [PATCH] bpf: fix memory constraint of ldx/stx instructions [PR108790] David Faust
2023-02-14 22:33 ` Jose E. Marchesi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).