public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com>
To: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Fix Intel MIC 'mkoffload' for OpenMP 'requires' (was: [Patch] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp)
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 14:38:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtdml8ks.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0d0b2fcf-6357-f896-dcd9-99b3d81acd21@codesourcery.com>

Hi Tobias!

On 2022-07-06T13:29:14+0200, Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On 06.07.22 13:04, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> On 2022-06-08T05:56:02+0200, Tobias Burnus <Tobias_Burnus@mentor.com> wrote:
>>> PS: I have not fully tested the intelmic version.
>> As part of my standard testing, I'm reporting that it got completely
>> broken.  ;'-)
>
> Interesting. Because intelmic-mkoffload.cc calls GOMP_offload_register
> and not GOMP_offload_register_ver - and that call path should be unchanged.

True indeed for that code path...

> However, I missed that I had an assert that GCC_OFFLOAD_OMP_REQUIRES_FILE is
> set.

..., but not for that one.

> Thus, an alternative is to change that into an 'if'.
> But I concur that updating intelmic-mkoffload.cc is nicer! Thanks!

ACK.


> Regarding:
>> -! { dg-do link { target { offload_target_nvptx || offload_target_amdgcn } } }
>> +! { dg-do link { target offloading_enabled } }
> This patch looks wrong. We are not interested whether there is an offloading device
> available or not - but whether the offloading compiler is running.
>
> Those are completely independent. Obviously, offloading can be configured but not
> being present. (That's the usual case for testing distro builds but also can
> occur elsewhere.)
> And also the reverse if possible - usually because of -foffload=... but when GCC is
> configured with --enable-offload-defaulted, also other combinations are possible.
>
>
> I think the proper check would be write and use an 'offload_target_any',
> i.e. OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES= being present and nonempty.
>
> Cf. check_effective_target_offload_target_nvptx / ..._amdgcn and
> libgomp_check_effective_target_offload_target
> in libgomp/testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp
>
> Possible patch (untested):
>
> # Return 1 if compiling for some offload target(s)
> proc check_effective_target_offload_target_any { } {
>      return [libgomp_check_effective_target_offload_target ""]
> }
>
> At least if I understand the following correctly, "" should work:
>          return [string match "*:$target_name*:*" ":$gcc_offload_targets:"]

:-) Haha, that's actually *exactly* what I had implemented first!  But
then I realized that 'target offloading_enabled' is doing exactly that:
check that offloading compilation is configured -- not that "there is an
offloading device available or not" as you seem to understand?  Or am I
confused there?

I do however agree that (generally) replacing 'target offloading_enabled'
with a new 'target offload_target_any' would seem appropriate (as a
separate patch), because that would also do the right thing when running
libgomp testing with non-default '-foffload=[...]', including
'-foffload=disable'.

For checking "offloading device available" we'd use
'check_effective_target_offload_device[...]'.


Grüße
 Thomas


> Thanks for taking care of the patch fallout!
>
> Tobias
-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-06 12:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-13 15:07 [PATCH, OpenMP 5.0] More implementation of the requires directive Chung-Lin Tang
2021-01-13 15:27 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-03-25 11:18 ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-03-29 13:42 ` Andrew Stubbs
2022-06-08  3:56 ` [Patch] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp Tobias Burnus
2022-06-09 11:40   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-09 12:46     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-06-09 14:19       ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-29 14:33         ` [Patch][v4] " Tobias Burnus
2022-06-29 17:02           ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-29 18:10             ` Tobias Burnus
2022-06-29 20:18               ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-07-01 13:06                 ` [Patch][v5] " Tobias Burnus
2022-07-01 14:34                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-07-01 16:31                     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-01 16:55                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-07-01 21:08                         ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-04  8:31                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-07-07 13:26                           ` Fix one issue in OpenMP 'requires' directive diagnostics (was: [Patch][v5] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp) Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-07 13:56                             ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-08  6:59                               ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 10:42                   ` Restore 'GOMP_offload_unregister_ver' functionality " Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 13:59                     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-06 21:08                       ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-08-17 11:45                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-09-15  9:41                   ` [Patch][v5] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-07  8:37           ` Adjust 'libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c' (was: [Patch][v4] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp) Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-07  9:02             ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-07  8:42           ` Enhance 'libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-4.c', 'libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-5.c' testing " Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-07  9:36             ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-07 10:42               ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 10:30   ` Define 'OMP_REQUIRES_[...]', 'GOMP_REQUIRES_[...]' in a single place (was: [Patch] " Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 13:40     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-06 11:04   ` Fix Intel MIC 'mkoffload' for OpenMP 'requires' " Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 11:29     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-06 12:38       ` Thomas Schwinge [this message]
2022-07-06 13:30         ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-07 10:46           ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 14:19     ` Tobias Burnus
2024-03-07 12:38   ` nvptx: 'cuDeviceGetCount' failure is fatal " Thomas Schwinge
2024-03-07 14:28     ` nvptx: 'cuDeviceGetCount' failure is fatal Tobias Burnus
2024-03-08 15:58       ` Thomas Schwinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mtdml8ks.fsf@dem-tschwing-1.ger.mentorg.com \
    --to=thomas@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).