public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Patch][v5] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 10:31:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YsKlXQ4OyLUvt1PO@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4d42ab12-53bd-f564-25df-2e8c890f406a@codesourcery.com>

On Fri, Jul 01, 2022 at 11:08:16PM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>    gomp_mutex_lock (&register_lock);
>  
> +  if (omp_requires_mask && omp_requires_mask != omp_req)

I'd use if (omp_req && omp_requires_mask && omp_requires_mask != omp_req)
e.g. for the case of mixing GCC <= 12 compiled code with GCC 13,
treat omp_req 0 as "don't know" while GOMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED
as "known and no requires uni*/rev* specified".

> +    {
> +      char buf1[sizeof ("unified_address, unified_shared_memory, "
> +			"reverse_offload")];
> +      char buf2[sizeof ("unified_address, unified_shared_memory, "
> +			"reverse_offload")];
> +      gomp_requires_to_name (buf2, sizeof (buf2),
> +			     omp_req != GOMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED
> +			     ? omp_req : omp_requires_mask);
> +      if (omp_req != GOMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED
> +	  && omp_requires_mask != GOMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED)
> +	{
> +	  gomp_requires_to_name (buf1, sizeof (buf1), omp_requires_mask);
> +	  gomp_fatal ("OpenMP 'requires' directive with non-identical clauses "
> +		      "in multiple compilation units: '%s' vs. '%s'",
> +		      buf1, buf2);
> +	}
> +      else
> +	gomp_fatal ("OpenMP 'requires' directive with '%s' specified only in "
> +		    "some compilation units", buf2);
> +    }
> +  omp_requires_mask = omp_req;
> +
>    /* Load image to all initialized devices.  */
>    for (i = 0; i < num_devices; i++)
>      {
> @@ -4125,8 +4173,30 @@ gomp_target_init (void)
>  
>  	if (gomp_load_plugin_for_device (&current_device, plugin_name))
>  	  {
> -	    new_num_devs = current_device.get_num_devices_func ();
> -	    if (new_num_devs >= 1)
> +	    int omp_req = omp_requires_mask & ~GOMP_REQUIRES_TARGET_USED;
> +	    new_num_devs = current_device.get_num_devices_func (omp_req);
> +	    if (new_num_devs < 0)

Can this be if (gomp_debug && new_num_devs < 0) - i.e. be verbose only
when the user asks for it?

> +	      {
> +		bool found = false;
> +		int type = current_device.get_type_func ();
> +		for (int img = 0; img < num_offload_images; img++)
> +		  if (type == offload_images[img].type)
> +		    found = true;
> +		if (found)
> +		  {
> +		    char buf[sizeof ("unified_address, unified_shared_memory, "
> +				     "reverse_offload")];
> +		    gomp_requires_to_name (buf, sizeof (buf), omp_req);
> +		    char *name = (char *) malloc (cur_len + 1);
> +		    memcpy (name, cur, cur_len);
> +		    name[cur_len] = '\0';
> +		    GOMP_PLUGIN_error ("note: %s devices present but 'omp "
> +				       "requires %s' cannot be fulfilled",
> +				       name, buf);
> +		    free (name);
> +		  }
> +	      }
> +	    else if (new_num_devs >= 1)
>  	      {
>  		/* Augment DEVICES and NUM_DEVICES.  */
>  

Otherwise LGTM.

	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-13 15:07 [PATCH, OpenMP 5.0] More implementation of the requires directive Chung-Lin Tang
2021-01-13 15:27 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-03-25 11:18 ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-03-29 13:42 ` Andrew Stubbs
2022-06-08  3:56 ` [Patch] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp Tobias Burnus
2022-06-09 11:40   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-09 12:46     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-06-09 14:19       ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-29 14:33         ` [Patch][v4] " Tobias Burnus
2022-06-29 17:02           ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-06-29 18:10             ` Tobias Burnus
2022-06-29 20:18               ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-07-01 13:06                 ` [Patch][v5] " Tobias Burnus
2022-07-01 14:34                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-07-01 16:31                     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-01 16:55                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-07-01 21:08                         ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-04  8:31                           ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-07-07 13:26                           ` Fix one issue in OpenMP 'requires' directive diagnostics (was: [Patch][v5] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp) Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-07 13:56                             ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-08  6:59                               ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 10:42                   ` Restore 'GOMP_offload_unregister_ver' functionality " Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 13:59                     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-06 21:08                       ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-08-17 11:45                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-09-15  9:41                   ` [Patch][v5] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-07  8:37           ` Adjust 'libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-3.c' (was: [Patch][v4] OpenMP: Move omp requires checks to libgomp) Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-07  9:02             ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-07  8:42           ` Enhance 'libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-4.c', 'libgomp.c-c++-common/requires-5.c' testing " Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-07  9:36             ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-07 10:42               ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 10:30   ` Define 'OMP_REQUIRES_[...]', 'GOMP_REQUIRES_[...]' in a single place (was: [Patch] " Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 13:40     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-06 11:04   ` Fix Intel MIC 'mkoffload' for OpenMP 'requires' " Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 11:29     ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-06 12:38       ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 13:30         ` Tobias Burnus
2022-07-07 10:46           ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-07-06 14:19     ` Tobias Burnus
2024-03-07 12:38   ` nvptx: 'cuDeviceGetCount' failure is fatal " Thomas Schwinge
2024-03-07 14:28     ` nvptx: 'cuDeviceGetCount' failure is fatal Tobias Burnus
2024-03-08 15:58       ` Thomas Schwinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YsKlXQ4OyLUvt1PO@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).