From: ibuclaw@gdcproject.org
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Always default to DWARF2_DEBUG if not specified, warn about deprecated STABS
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 16:48:21 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88967537.63492.1635518901535@office.mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2110260119050.1593729@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
> On 26/10/2021 03:28 Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Oct 2021, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > So it looks like tm_d.h is much more stripped down compared to regular
> > tm_p.h but also oddly enough config/default-d.c includes tm_d.h
> > while config/default-c.c explicitely documents itself to not do that.
>
> I think the intent of that comment in default-c.c (which I wrote) was that
> if a separate tm_c.h is needed, it should use its own headers, disjoint
> from those used by tm.h. In particular, as noted in the original patch
> submission
> <https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg00434.html>, that
> avoids making macros used only to define hooks visible throughout the
> compiler.
>
> > Is it maybe a bug that tm_d.h includes defaults.h at all? Should
>
> It's a bug that it includes defaults.h, and a bug that it includes
> ${cpu_type}/${cpu_type}.h. Any macros used only to define D hooks should
> be in completely separate headers that aren't used elsewhere in the
> compiler.
>
> > "d defaults" be in a defaults-d.h instead? If I remove the
>
> Yes, and likewise any target-specific overrides of such macros should be
> in a separate header, not ${cpu_type}/${cpu_type}.h.
>
So the what default-d.c is doing, is pulling down per-CPU back-end information to populate the targetdm structure where there's a supported CPU, but not platform. The why it is doing that was I wanted to avoid both having #ifdef's in the D front-end, and altering gcc/target.def.
It seems then that either all TARGET_D_ macros should be moved to ${cpu_type}/${cpu_type}-d.h, or do one of alternatives I was trying to avoid.
Iain.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-29 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-21 14:25 Richard Biener
2021-09-28 6:14 ` Richard Biener
2021-09-28 13:18 ` Koning, Paul
2021-10-15 8:23 ` Richard Biener
2021-10-23 20:00 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2021-10-23 22:19 ` Jeff Law
2021-10-24 6:36 ` Richard Biener
2021-10-24 7:20 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2021-10-25 8:25 ` Richard Biener
2021-10-26 1:28 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-29 14:48 ` ibuclaw [this message]
2022-08-28 7:50 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2022-08-28 21:32 ` Jeff Law
2022-08-29 20:11 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2022-08-31 16:05 ` Jeff Law
2022-09-07 10:50 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2022-09-07 11:57 ` Richard Biener
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-10 12:12 Richard Biener
2021-09-10 15:08 ` Michael Matz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88967537.63492.1635518901535@office.mailbox.org \
--to=ibuclaw@gdcproject.org \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).