From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
To: Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, ibuclaw@gdcproject.org,
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Always default to DWARF2_DEBUG if not specified, warn about deprecated STABS
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 10:25:22 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <n286p9r-4n21-n5qp-14r1-7084s3285o31@fhfr.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211024072015.gaemuuwr4z2cx2oh@lug-owl.de>
On Sun, 24 Oct 2021, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On Sun, 2021-10-24 08:36:36 +0200, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de> wrote:
> > On October 23, 2021 10:00:05 PM GMT+02:00, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> wrote:
> > >On Tue, 2021-09-21 16:25:19 +0200, Richard Biener via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >> I have built all targets from contrib/config-list.mk to make sure we
> > >> don't run into the #error and the following makes the STABS usage
> > >> explicit for pdp11 and hppa with SOM.
> > >
> > >I'm running build tests based on config-list.mk as well and see a good
> > >number of targets failing, all about the same, ie. for moxie-elf:
> >
> > That's odd. I did test the patch using config-list.mk - the patch
> > sat in the comit tree for quite a while since that exercise (but
> > unchanged), but I doubt anything significant changed in between.
> >
> > >[all 2021-10-17 00:01:19] /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++ -fno-PIE -c
> > >-DIN_GCC_FRONTEND -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE
> > >-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall
> > >-Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-error=format-diag
> > >-Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
> > >-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -Werror
> > >-fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../gcc/gcc -I../../gcc/gcc/.
> > >-I../../gcc/gcc/../include -I../../gcc/gcc/../libcpp/include
> > >-I../../gcc/gcc/../libcody -I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber
> > >-I../../gcc/gcc/../libdecnumber/dpd -I../libdecnumber
> > >-I../../gcc/gcc/../libbacktrace -o default-d.o -MT default-d.o -MMD
> > >-MP -MF ./.deps/default-d.TPo ../../gcc/gcc/config/default-d.c [all
> > >2021-10-17 00:01:19] In file included from ./tm_d.h:9, [all
> > >2021-10-17 00:01:19] from ../../gcc/gcc/config/default-d.c:22: [all
> > >2021-10-17 00:01:19] ../../gcc/gcc/defaults.h:908:2: error: #error
> > >You must define PREFERRED_DEBUGGING_TYPE if DWARF is not supported
> >
> > Is that building the D frontend? I remember restricting the builds to C...
>
> Probably. I configure as
>
> .../gcc/configure --target=moxie-elf --enable-werror-always
> --enable-languages=all --disable-gcov --disable-shared
> --disable-threads --without-headers
> --prefix=/var/lib/laminar/run/gcc-moxie-elf/13/toolchain-install
So it looks like tm_d.h is much more stripped down compared to regular
tm_p.h but also oddly enough config/default-d.c includes tm_d.h
while config/default-c.c explicitely documents itself to not do that.
In particular tm_d.h includes defaults.h which now has the requirement
that either PREFERRED_DEBUGGING_TYPE is defined or DWARF2_DEBUGGING_INFO
but the latter is usually picked up from config/elfos.h or similar
which are headers _not_ included via tm_d.h.
The old defaults.h resulted in NO_DEBUG if no PREFERRED_DEBUGGING_TYPE
and no DWARF2_DEBUGGING_INFO was defined.
I also note that default-d.o is not built on x86_64-linux? Looks
like that's built only for
if [ "$target_has_targetdm" = "no" ]; then
d_target_objs="$d_target_objs default-d.o"
fi
I note that for example config/glibc-d.c includes tm.h and tm_p.h
which would end up in proper definitions.
So ... for moxie-elf, did D really end up with NO_DEBUG previously?
Is that "correct" for D or was that a bug? moxie-elf seems to use
default-c.c as well but that does not end including defaults.h.
Is it maybe a bug that tm_d.h includes defaults.h at all? Should
"d defaults" be in a defaults-d.h instead? If I remove the
defaults.h include from tm_d.h the build for moxie-elf succeeds.
Ian? Joseph?
Thanks,
Richard.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-25 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-21 14:25 Richard Biener
2021-09-28 6:14 ` Richard Biener
2021-09-28 13:18 ` Koning, Paul
2021-10-15 8:23 ` Richard Biener
2021-10-23 20:00 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2021-10-23 22:19 ` Jeff Law
2021-10-24 6:36 ` Richard Biener
2021-10-24 7:20 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2021-10-25 8:25 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2021-10-26 1:28 ` Joseph Myers
2021-10-29 14:48 ` ibuclaw
2022-08-28 7:50 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2022-08-28 21:32 ` Jeff Law
2022-08-29 20:11 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2022-08-31 16:05 ` Jeff Law
2022-09-07 10:50 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2022-09-07 11:57 ` Richard Biener
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-09-10 12:12 Richard Biener
2021-09-10 15:08 ` Michael Matz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=n286p9r-4n21-n5qp-14r1-7084s3285o31@fhfr.qr \
--to=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ibuclaw@gdcproject.org \
--cc=jbglaw@lug-owl.de \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).