From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
David <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-1, rs6000] Replace shift and ior insns with one rotate and mask insn for bswap pattern [PR93453]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2022 16:44:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92b55526-6247-84d3-b3cc-013aeaf3b04b@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc959d08-2b1f-55fa-470a-4ef072c02963@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Haochen,
on 2022/6/6 10:21, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi,
> This patch replaces shift and ior insns with one rotate and mask
> insn for the split patterns which are for DI byte swap on Power6 and
> before. The test cases shows the optimization.
Nit: I noticed two splitting which are updated in this patch are guarded with
"TARGET_POWERPC64 && !TARGET_LDBRX && reload_completed"
and
"TARGET_POWERPC64 && !TARGET_P9_VECTOR && reload_completed"
separately, "Power6 and before" doesn't match the later condition well.
Maybe you can remove "Power6 and before" in commit log to avoid confusion. :)
>
> Bootstrapped and tested on ppc64 Linux BE and LE with no regressions.
> Is this okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.
>
> ChangeLog
> 2022-06-06 Haochen Gui <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
>
> gcc/
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.md (split for DI load byte swap): Merge shift
> and ior insns to one rotate and mask insn.
> (split for DI register byte swap): Likewise.
Nit: (define_split for bswapdi load) and (define_split for bswapdi reg)?
>
> gcc/testsuite/
> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr93453-1.c: New.
>
> patch.diff
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> index bf85baa5370..2e38195aaac 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.md
> @@ -2828,8 +2828,8 @@ (define_split
> emit_insn (gen_bswapsi2 (dest_32, word2));
> }
>
> - emit_insn (gen_ashldi3 (op3, op3, GEN_INT (32)));
> - emit_insn (gen_iordi3 (dest, dest, op3));
> + emit_insn (gen_rotldi3_insert_3 (dest, op3, GEN_INT (32), dest,
> + GEN_INT ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 32) - 1)));
Very nit: I found two other used places of gen_rotldi3_insert_3 are using
GEN_INT (0xffffffff) directly, maybe it's good to keep this same with them ...
> DONE;
> })
>
> @@ -2914,10 +2914,10 @@ (define_split
> rtx op3_si = simplify_gen_subreg (SImode, op3, DImode, lo_off);
>
> emit_insn (gen_lshrdi3 (op2, src, GEN_INT (32)));
> - emit_insn (gen_bswapsi2 (dest_si, src_si));
> - emit_insn (gen_bswapsi2 (op3_si, op2_si));
> - emit_insn (gen_ashldi3 (dest, dest, GEN_INT (32)));
> - emit_insn (gen_iordi3 (dest, dest, op3));
> + emit_insn (gen_bswapsi2 (op3_si, src_si));
> + emit_insn (gen_bswapsi2 (dest_si, op2_si));
> + emit_insn (gen_rotldi3_insert_3 (dest, op3, GEN_INT (32), dest,
> + GEN_INT ((HOST_WIDE_INT_1U << 32) - 1)));
... Same here.
OK with those nits fixed. Thanks!
BR,
Kewen
> DONE;
> })
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr93453-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr93453-1.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..4271886561f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr93453-1.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
> +/* { dg-do compile { target lp64 } } */
> +/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power6 -O2" } */
> +
> +unsigned long load_byte_reverse (unsigned long *in)
> +{
> + return __builtin_bswap64 (*in);
> +}
> +
> +unsigned long byte_reverse (unsigned long in)
> +{
> + return __builtin_bswap64 (in);
> +}
> +
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {\mrldimi\M} 2 } } */
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-06 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-06 2:21 HAO CHEN GUI
2022-06-06 8:44 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92b55526-6247-84d3-b3cc-013aeaf3b04b@linux.ibm.com \
--to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=guihaoc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).