[PATCH] Drop need for constant I in ctf test

[PATCH] Drop need for constant I in ctf test

[Alexandre Oliva]

Though I is supposed to be a constant expression, this is not the case
on vxworks, but this is not what this debug information format test is
testing for, so use real constants to initialize complex variables.

Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Tested on arm-vxworks7 (gcc-12) and arm-eabi (trunk).  Ok to install?

for  gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

	* gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c: Do not test whether I is
	usable in initializers.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
index a36dd9b6b90a9..e6c3199f913d7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug/ctf/ctf-complex-1.c
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@
 
 #include <complex.h>
 
-double complex z1 = I * I;
+double complex z1 = -1;
 
-const long double complex z2 = I * I;
+const long double complex z2 = -1;
 
-float complex z4 = 1+2.11*I;
+float complex z4 = 1;

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker                https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
   Free Software Activist                       GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts.  Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>

Re: [PATCH] Drop need for constant I in ctf test

[Mike Stump]

On Feb 16, 2023, at 10:59 PM, Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com> wrote:
> 
> Though I is supposed to be a constant expression, this is not the case
> on vxworks, but this is not what this debug information format test is
> testing for, so use real constants to initialize complex variables.
> 
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu.
> Tested on arm-vxworks7 (gcc-12) and arm-eabi (trunk).  Ok to install?

Ok.