public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: 钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: kito.cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
Cc: "Jeff Law" <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	 gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 kito.cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>,  palmer <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	 palmer <palmer@rivosinc.com>,  rdapp.gcc <rdapp.gcc@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add rounding mode operand for floating point instructions
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 22:24:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AEF2546B09095FE7+2023051522240055703614@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+yXCZBPqP5sAUnPWcbCynUGCSwx+=X--KMQ-w+0zzmA_jXjRw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2998 bytes --]

What about vfsnjn ? Do they have FRM ? I want to double check it since I don't trust document.



juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
 
From: Kito Cheng
Date: 2023-05-15 22:22
To: 钟居哲
CC: Jeff Law; gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer; palmer; rdapp.gcc
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add rounding mode operand for floating point instructions
> Oh, do you mean vfsqrt7/vfrec7 doesn't have frm, but vfsqrt/vfneg should have frm.
> Is that rigth? If yes, I am gonna send a patch to fix it immediately.
 
Yes, and I also double checked spike implementation :P
 
and it seems like you're not committed yet, so let's send V2 :)
 
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:12 PM 钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> wrote:
>
> Oh, do you mean vfsqrt7/vfrec7 doesn't have frm, but vfsqrt/vfneg should have frm.
> Is that rigth? If yes, I am gonna send a patch to fix it immediately.
>
>
>
> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
>
> From: Kito Cheng
> Date: 2023-05-15 22:07
> To: 钟居哲
> CC: Jeff Law; gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer; palmer; rdapp.gcc
> Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add rounding mode operand for floating point instructions
> Oh, Craig says vfrsqrt7.v not have frm but vsqrt.v have frm, and
> checked spike that match that.
>
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 9:55 PM 钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> wrote:
> >
> > I don't know why we should not add frm vfsqrt.v since I saw topper (LLVM maintainer) said we should
> > not add frm into vsqrt.v. Maybe kito knows the reason ?
> >
> > https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc/pull/226
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
> >
> > From: Jeff Law
> > Date: 2023-05-15 21:52
> > To: juzhe.zhong; gcc-patches
> > CC: kito.cheng; kito.cheng; palmer; palmer; rdapp.gcc
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Add rounding mode operand for floating point instructions
> >
> >
> > On 5/15/23 05:49, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
> > > From: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
> > >
> > > This patch is adding rounding mode operand and FRM_REGNUM dependency
> > > into floating-point instructions.
> > >
> > > The floating-point instructions we added FRM and rounding mode operand:
> > > 1. vfadd/vfsub
> > > 2. vfwadd/vfwsub
> > > 3. vfmul
> > > 4. vfdiv
> > > 5. vfwmul
> > > 6. vfwmacc/vfwnmacc/vfwmsac/vfwnmsac
> > > 7. vfsqrt7/vfrec7
> > > 8. floating-point conversions.
> > > 9. floating-point reductions.
> > >
> > > The floating-point instructions we did NOT add FRM and rounding mode operand:
> > > 1. vfsqrt/vfneg
> > Assuming vfsqrt is actually an estimator the best place to handle
> > rounding modes is at the last step(s) after N-R or Goldschmidt
> > refinement steps.  I haven't paid too much attention to FP yet, but this
> > is an area I've got fairly extensive experience.
> >
> > Sadly RISC-V's estimator is fairly poor and the single instance FMACs
> > are going to result in an implementation that may not actually be any
> > better than what glibc can do.
> >
> > Jeff
> >
>
 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-15 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-15 11:49 juzhe.zhong
2023-05-15 13:44 ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-15 13:52   ` Jeff Law
2023-05-15 13:52 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-15 13:54   ` 钟居哲
2023-05-15 14:07     ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-15 14:08       ` 钟居哲
2023-05-15 14:12       ` 钟居哲
2023-05-15 14:22         ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-15 14:24           ` 钟居哲 [this message]
2023-05-15 14:28           ` 钟居哲
2023-05-15 14:37           ` 钟居哲
2023-05-15 14:41             ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-15 14:55               ` 钟居哲
2023-05-16  3:56     ` Jeff Law

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AEF2546B09095FE7+2023051522240055703614@rivai.ai \
    --to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=rdapp.gcc@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).