* [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.
@ 2024-04-02 10:42 Aleksandar Rakic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Rakic @ 2024-04-02 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
Cc: Jovan Dmitrovic, richard.guenther, Djordje Todorovic,
jeffreyalaw, Uros Beric
I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity
2024-06-26 12:50 ` Richard Biener
@ 2024-06-26 14:18 ` Aleksandar Rakic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Rakic @ 2024-06-26 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Biener
Cc: gcc-patches, jeffreyalaw, rguenther, jakub, Djordje Todorovic,
Jovan Dmitrovic
The mail I pointed to ( https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html ) is an answer to the topic started by Dimitrije Milošević. I replied to the topic in the same way as you answered here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604298.html .
The meaning of all the tests is elaborated in the mail I pointed to ( https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html ). The mail I pointed to contains a link to the patch ( https://github.com/rakicaleksandar1999/gcc/tree/bug_109429 ) but it joined with a full stop.
I will not accept my work to be presented as irrelevant and inappropriate.
________________________________________
From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 2:50 PM
To: Aleksandar Rakic
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; jeffreyalaw@gmail.com; rguenther@suse.de; jakub@redhat.com; Djordje Todorovic; Jovan Dmitrovic
Subject: Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:28 PM Aleksandar Rakic
<Aleksandar.Rakic@syrmia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to ping the following patch:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html
> a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported addressing modes in ivopts
The thread starting at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604128.html
contains much information. The mail you point to contains
inappropriate testsuite additions,
refers to a commit that doesn't look relevant and in fact does not
"revert" anything. I also
can't remember seeing it, it might have been classified as spam.
I would consider to instead of citing the patch by reference to re-post it.
Richard.
> This patch should be a fix for the bug which is described on the following link:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429
> It modifies the order of the complexity calculation. By fixing the complexities, the
> candidate selection is also fixed, which leads to the smaller code size.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Aleksandar Rakić
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity
2024-06-26 12:28 Aleksandar Rakic
@ 2024-06-26 12:50 ` Richard Biener
2024-06-26 14:18 ` Aleksandar Rakic
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2024-06-26 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Aleksandar Rakic
Cc: gcc-patches, jeffreyalaw, rguenther, jakub, Djordje Todorovic,
Jovan Dmitrovic
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 2:28 PM Aleksandar Rakic
<Aleksandar.Rakic@syrmia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'd like to ping the following patch:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html
> a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported addressing modes in ivopts
The thread starting at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-October/604128.html
contains much information. The mail you point to contains
inappropriate testsuite additions,
refers to a commit that doesn't look relevant and in fact does not
"revert" anything. I also
can't remember seeing it, it might have been classified as spam.
I would consider to instead of citing the patch by reference to re-post it.
Richard.
> This patch should be a fix for the bug which is described on the following link:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429
> It modifies the order of the complexity calculation. By fixing the complexities, the
> candidate selection is also fixed, which leads to the smaller code size.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Aleksandar Rakić
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity
@ 2024-06-26 12:28 Aleksandar Rakic
2024-06-26 12:50 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Rakic @ 2024-06-26 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
Cc: richard.guenther, jeffreyalaw, rguenther, jakub,
Djordje Todorovic, Jovan Dmitrovic
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 555 bytes --]
Hi!
I'd like to ping the following patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html
a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported addressing modes in ivopts
This patch should be a fix for the bug which is described on the following link:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429
It modifies the order of the complexity calculation. By fixing the complexities, the
candidate selection is also fixed, which leads to the smaller code size.
Thanks
Aleksandar Rakić
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity
@ 2024-05-22 12:57 Aleksandar Rakic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Rakic @ 2024-05-22 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
Cc: richard.guenther, jeffreyalaw, rguenther, jakub,
Djordje Todorovic, Jovan Dmitrovic
Hi!
I'd like to ping the following patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html
a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported addressing modes in ivopts
This patch should be a fix for the bug which is described on the following link:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429
It modifies the order of the complexity calculation. By fixing the complexities, the
candidate selection is also fixed, which leads to the smaller code size.
Thanks
Aleksandar Rakić
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.
@ 2024-04-11 15:09 Aleksandar Rakic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Rakic @ 2024-04-11 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Aleksandar Rakic
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 239 bytes --]
PING: I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.
2024-03-18 20:27 Aleksandar Rakic
@ 2024-03-27 11:21 ` Aleksandar Rakic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandar Rakic @ 2024-03-27 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
Cc: Jovan Dmitrovic, richard.guenther, Djordje Todorovic,
jeffreyalaw, Uros Beric
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 233 bytes --]
I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.
@ 2023-03-23 10:07 Jovan Dmitrovic
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jovan Dmitrovic @ 2023-03-23 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 104 bytes --]
Ping for patch from December 2022: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-December/608895.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-26 14:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-02 10:42 [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity Aleksandar Rakic
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-06-26 12:28 Aleksandar Rakic
2024-06-26 12:50 ` Richard Biener
2024-06-26 14:18 ` Aleksandar Rakic
2024-05-22 12:57 Aleksandar Rakic
2024-04-11 15:09 Aleksandar Rakic
2024-03-18 20:27 Aleksandar Rakic
2024-03-27 11:21 ` [PING] " Aleksandar Rakic
2023-03-23 10:07 Jovan Dmitrovic
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).