Re: [PATCH] fix small const data for riscv

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 5:03 AM Oria Chen via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> gcc/testsuite ChangeLog:
>
> 2022-11-11  Oria Chen  <oriachiuan@gmail.com>
>
>         * gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c: Add compile option "-msmall-data-limit=0" to avoid using .srodata section.

I noticed g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-rom.C has some slightly different
handling here.
Seems like there should be a generic way to add
-G0/-msmall-data-limit=0 if we don't want small data for a testcase
rather than the current scheme of things.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c
> index 74fe2ae6626..628ddf1a761 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25521.c
> @@ -2,7 +2,8 @@
>     sections.
>
>     { dg-require-effective-target elf }
> -   { dg-do compile } */
> +   { dg-do compile }
> +   { dg-options "-msmall-data-limit=0" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } */
>
>  const volatile int foo = 30;
>
> --
> 2.37.2
>