public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongyu Wang <wwwhhhyyy333@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>,
	Hongyu Wang <hongyu.wang@intel.com>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,  hongtao.liu@intel.com,
	ubizjak@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: Reword the description of -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop [PR 107676]
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:15:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+OydW=gyAZN8C42nMxxK7V0U8xRtDxADehsYSLSNhVxoC3fLQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7a41f182-1638-1a70-c0dc-b90b1985c31@ispras.ru>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1560 bytes --]

> When emitting a compare-and-swap loop for @ref{__sync Builtins}
> and @ref{__atomic Builtins} lacking a native instruction, optimize
> for the highly contended case by issuing an atomic load before the
> @code{CMPXCHG} instruction, and using the @code{PAUSE} instruction
> to save CPU power when restarting the loop.

Thanks for the correction, it looks quite clear now! Here is the
updated patch, ok for trunk?

Alexander Monakov via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
于2022年11月15日周二 21:59写道:
>
>
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2022, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> > > How about the following:
> > >
> > > When emitting a compare-and-swap loop for @ref{__sync Builtins}
> > > and @ref{__atomic Builtins} lacking a native instruction, optimize
> > > for the highly contended case by issuing an atomic load before the
> > > @code{CMPXCHG} instruction, and invoke the @code{PAUSE} instruction
> > > when restarting the loop.
> >
> > That's much better, thanks. My only remaining quibble would be that
> > "invoking" an instruction seems only marginally better than running
> > one. Emitting? Issuing? Using? Adding?
>
> Right, it should be 'using'; let me also add 'to save CPU power':
>
> When emitting a compare-and-swap loop for @ref{__sync Builtins}
> and @ref{__atomic Builtins} lacking a native instruction, optimize
> for the highly contended case by issuing an atomic load before the
> @code{CMPXCHG} instruction, and using the @code{PAUSE} instruction
> to save CPU power when restarting the loop.
>
> Alexander

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-doc-Reword-the-description-of-mrelax-cmpxchg-loop-PR.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1313 bytes --]

From e82f3e03115480ac3d055819658a107249932c65 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hongyu Wang <hongyu.wang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:16:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Reword the description of -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop [PR
 107676]

gcc/ChangeLog:

	PR target/107676
	* doc/invoke.texi: Reword the description of
	-mrelax-cmpxchg-loop.
---
 gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 40f667a630a..bcbe3a7e420 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -33805,10 +33805,11 @@ registers.
 
 @item -mrelax-cmpxchg-loop
 @opindex mrelax-cmpxchg-loop
-Relax cmpxchg loop by emitting an early load and compare before cmpxchg,
-execute pause if load value is not expected. This reduces excessive
-cachline bouncing when and works for all atomic logic fetch builtins
-that generates compare and swap loop.
+When emitting a compare-and-swap loop for @ref{__sync Builtins}
+and @ref{__atomic Builtins} lacking a native instruction, optimize
+for the highly contended case by issuing an atomic load before the
+@code{CMPXCHG} instruction, and using the @code{PAUSE} instruction
+to save CPU power when restarting the loop.
 
 @item -mindirect-branch=@var{choice}
 @opindex mindirect-branch
-- 
2.18.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-16  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15  3:35 Hongyu Wang
2022-11-15 10:53 ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-11-15 13:28   ` Alexander Monakov
2022-11-15 13:44     ` Jonathan Wakely
2022-11-15 13:59       ` Alexander Monakov
2022-11-16  5:15         ` Hongyu Wang [this message]
2022-11-16  7:51           ` Alexander Monakov
2022-11-16  8:29             ` Hongyu Wang
2022-11-16 10:51             ` Jonathan Wakely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+OydW=gyAZN8C42nMxxK7V0U8xRtDxADehsYSLSNhVxoC3fLQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=wwwhhhyyy333@gmail.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=hongyu.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).