public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>
To: 钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Cc: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 palmer <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix RVV machine mode attribute configuration
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2022 23:05:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+yXCZC_hK4A0-TJm=wzuPDQzuFwXZ7cbs9hA-3PfT+d1a4UKA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE28F5EB8DB27089+2022121709511753243369@rivai.ai>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1666 bytes --]

Commited to trunk.

钟居哲 <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai> 於 2022年12月17日 週六 09:52 寫道:

> Actually, I don't check and test HF carefully since I disable them.
> Kito ask me to disable all HF modes since zvfhmin is no ratified and GCC
> doesn't allow any un-ratified ISA. You can see vector-iterator.md that all
> RVV modes supported including QI HI SI DI SF DF excluding HF and BF.
>
>
>
> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
>
> From: Jeff Law
> Date: 2022-12-17 09:48
> To: juzhe.zhong; gcc-patches
> CC: kito.cheng; palmer
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Fix RVV machine mode attribute configuration
>
>
> On 12/14/22 00:01, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
> > From: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
> >
> > The attribute configuration of each machine mode are support in the
> previous patch.
> > I noticed some of them are not correct during VSETVL PASS testsing.
> > Correct them in the single patch now.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> >          * config/riscv/riscv-vector-switch.def (ENTRY): Correct
> attributes.
> >
>
>
>
> > @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ ENTRY (VNx2HI, true, LMUL_1, 16, LMUL_F2, 32)
> >   ENTRY (VNx1HI, true, LMUL_F2, 32, LMUL_F4, 64)
> >
> >   /* TODO:Disable all FP16 vector, enable them when 'zvfh' is
> supported.  */
> > -ENTRY (VNx32HF, false, LMUL_8, 2, LMUL_RESERVED, 0)
> > +ENTRY (VNx32HF, false, LMUL_RESERVED, 0, LMUL_8, 2)
> Is there any value in making VNx32HF dependent on TARGET_MIN_VLEN > 32
> like we're doing for VNx32HI?   In the past I've found it useful to have
> HI, HF, BF behave identically as much as possible.
>
> You call.  The patch is OK either way.
>
> jeff
>
>
>
>
>

      reply	other threads:[~2022-12-19 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-14  7:01 juzhe.zhong
2022-12-17  1:48 ` Jeff Law
2022-12-17  1:51   ` 钟居哲
2022-12-19 15:05     ` Kito Cheng [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+yXCZC_hK4A0-TJm=wzuPDQzuFwXZ7cbs9hA-3PfT+d1a4UKA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).