public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>
To: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>,
	gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	 richard.sandiford@arm.com
Subject: Re: [aarch64] Use dup and zip1 for interleaving elements in initializing vector
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2022 09:52:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAAgBjMnMpzNDYcDFOmzyLUi4zhepdp3AttbhC1ODKK2NQ=xvnQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAgBjM=AW6O_fy-bxajgA0ZSu1-F0K8dPtJ3M847TG7SFD+5jQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5625 bytes --]

On Tue, 6 Dec 2022 at 07:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
<prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 at 16:50, Richard Sandiford
> <richard.sandiford@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> > > Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org> writes:
> > >> Hi,
> > >> For the following test-case:
> > >>
> > >> int16x8_t foo(int16_t x, int16_t y)
> > >> {
> > >>   return (int16x8_t) { x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y };
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> Code gen at -O3:
> > >> foo:
> > >>         dup    v0.8h, w0
> > >>         ins     v0.h[1], w1
> > >>         ins     v0.h[3], w1
> > >>         ins     v0.h[5], w1
> > >>         ins     v0.h[7], w1
> > >>         ret
> > >>
> > >> For 16 elements, it results in 8 ins instructions which might not be
> > >> optimal perhaps.
> > >> I guess, the above code-gen would be equivalent to the following ?
> > >> dup v0.8h, w0
> > >> dup v1.8h, w1
> > >> zip1 v0.8h, v0.8h, v1.8h
> > >>
> > >> I have attached patch to do the same, if number of elements >= 8,
> > >> which should be possibly better compared to current code-gen ?
> > >> Patch passes bootstrap+test on aarch64-linux-gnu.
> > >> Does the patch look OK ?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Prathamesh
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > >> index c91df6f5006..e5dea70e363 100644
> > >> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > >> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
> > >> @@ -22028,6 +22028,39 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
> > >>        return;
> > >>      }
> > >>
> > >> +  /* Check for interleaving case.
> > >> +     For eg if initializer is (int16x8_t) {x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y}.
> > >> +     Generate following code:
> > >> +     dup v0.h, x
> > >> +     dup v1.h, y
> > >> +     zip1 v0.h, v0.h, v1.h
> > >> +     for "large enough" initializer.  */
> > >> +
> > >> +  if (n_elts >= 8)
> > >> +    {
> > >> +      int i;
> > >> +      for (i = 2; i < n_elts; i++)
> > >> +    if (!rtx_equal_p (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i), XVECEXP (vals, 0, i % 2)))
> > >> +      break;
> > >> +
> > >> +      if (i == n_elts)
> > >> +    {
> > >> +      machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (target);
> > >> +      rtx dest[2];
> > >> +
> > >> +      for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> > >> +        {
> > >> +          rtx x = copy_to_mode_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), XVECEXP (vals, 0, i));
> > >
> > > Formatting nit: long line.
> > >
> > >> +          dest[i] = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
> > >> +          aarch64_emit_move (dest[i], gen_vec_duplicate (mode, x));
> > >> +        }
> > >
> > > This could probably be written:
> > >
> > >         for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> > >           {
> > >             rtx x = expand_vector_broadcast (mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, i));
> > >             dest[i] = force_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), x);
> >
> > Oops, I meant "mode" rather than "GET_MODE_INNER (mode)", sorry.
> Thanks, I have pushed the change in
> 769370f3e2e04823c8a621d8ffa756dd83ebf21e after running
> bootstrap+test on aarch64-linux-gnu.
Hi Richard,
I have attached a patch that extends the transform if one half is dup
and other is set of constants.
For eg:
int8x16_t f(int8_t x)
{
  return (int8x16_t) { x, 1, x, 2, x, 3, x, 4, x, 5, x, 6, x, 7, x, 8 };
}

code-gen trunk:
f:
        adrp    x1, .LC0
        ldr     q0, [x1, #:lo12:.LC0]
        ins     v0.b[0], w0
        ins     v0.b[2], w0
        ins     v0.b[4], w0
        ins     v0.b[6], w0
        ins     v0.b[8], w0
        ins     v0.b[10], w0
        ins     v0.b[12], w0
        ins     v0.b[14], w0
        ret

code-gen with patch:
f:
        dup     v0.16b, w0
        adrp    x0, .LC0
        ldr     q1, [x0, #:lo12:.LC0]
        zip1    v0.16b, v0.16b, v1.16b
        ret

Bootstrapped+tested on aarch64-linux-gnu.
Does it look OK ?

Thanks,
Prathamesh
>

> Thanks,
> Prathamesh
> >
> > >           }
> > >
> > > which avoids forcing constant elements into a register before the duplication.
> > > OK with that change if it works.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Richard
> > >
> > >> +
> > >> +      rtvec v = gen_rtvec (2, dest[0], dest[1]);
> > >> +      emit_set_insn (target, gen_rtx_UNSPEC (mode, v, UNSPEC_ZIP1));
> > >> +      return;
> > >> +    }
> > >> +    }
> > >> +
> > >>    enum insn_code icode = optab_handler (vec_set_optab, mode);
> > >>    gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing);
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c
> > >> new file mode 100644
> > >> index 00000000000..ee775048589
> > >> --- /dev/null
> > >> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c
> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
> > >> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > >> +/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
> > >> +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
> > >> +
> > >> +#include <arm_neon.h>
> > >> +
> > >> +/*
> > >> +** foo:
> > >> +**  ...
> > >> +**  dup     v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
> > >> +**  dup     v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
> > >> +**  zip1    v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
> > >> +**  ...
> > >> +**  ret
> > >> +*/
> > >> +
> > >> +int16x8_t foo(int16_t x, int y)
> > >> +{
> > >> +  int16x8_t v = (int16x8_t) {x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y};
> > >> +  return v;
> > >> +}
> > >> +
> > >> +/*
> > >> +** foo2:
> > >> +**  ...
> > >> +**  dup     v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
> > >> +**  movi    v[0-9]+\.8h, 0x1
> > >> +**  zip1    v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
> > >> +**  ...
> > >> +**  ret
> > >> +*/
> > >> +
> > >> +int16x8_t foo2(int16_t x)
> > >> +{
> > >> +  int16x8_t v = (int16x8_t) {x, 1, x, 1, x, 1, x, 1};
> > >> +  return v;
> > >> +}

[-- Attachment #2: gnu-812-2.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 5524 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
index 9a79a9e7928..411e85f52a4 100644
--- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
@@ -21984,6 +21984,54 @@ aarch64_simd_make_constant (rtx vals)
     return NULL_RTX;
 }
 
+/* Subroutine of aarch64_expand_vector_init.
+   Check if VALS has same element at every alternate position
+   from START_POS.  */
+
+static
+bool aarch64_init_interleaving_dup_p (rtx vals, int start_pos)
+{
+  for (int i = start_pos + 2; i < XVECLEN (vals, 0); i += 2)
+    if (!rtx_equal_p (XVECEXP (vals, 0, start_pos), XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)))
+      return false;
+  return true;
+}
+
+/* Subroutine of aarch64_expand_vector_init.
+   Check if every alternate element in VALS starting from START_POS
+   is a constant.  */
+
+static
+bool aarch64_init_interleaving_const_p (rtx vals, int start_pos)
+{
+  for (int i = start_pos; i < XVECLEN (vals, 0); i += 2)
+    if (!CONSTANT_P (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i)))
+      return false;
+  return true;
+}
+
+/* Subroutine of aarch64_expand_vector_init.
+   Copy all odd-numbered or even-numbered elements from VALS
+   depending on CONST_EVEN.
+   For eg if VALS is { x, 1, x, 2, x, 3, x, 4 }
+   return {1, 2, 3, 4, 1, 1, 1, 1}.
+   We are only interested in the first half {0 ... n_elts/2} since
+   that will be used by zip1 for merging. Fill the second half
+   with an arbitrary value since it will be discarded.  */
+
+static
+rtx aarch64_init_interleaving_shift_init (rtx vals, bool const_even)
+{
+  int n_elts = XVECLEN (vals, 0);
+  rtvec vec = rtvec_alloc (n_elts);
+  int i;
+  for (i = 0; i < n_elts / 2; i++)
+    RTVEC_ELT (vec, i) = XVECEXP (vals, 0, (const_even) ? 2 * i : 2 * i + 1);
+  for (; i < n_elts; i++)
+    RTVEC_ELT (vec, i) = RTVEC_ELT (vec, 0);
+  return gen_rtx_CONST_VECTOR (GET_MODE (vals), vec);
+}
+
 /* Expand a vector initialisation sequence, such that TARGET is
    initialised to contain VALS.  */
 
@@ -22048,22 +22096,55 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
       return;
     }
 
-  /* Check for interleaving case.
-     For eg if initializer is (int16x8_t) {x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y}.
-     Generate following code:
-     dup v0.h, x
-     dup v1.h, y
-     zip1 v0.h, v0.h, v1.h
-     for "large enough" initializer.  */
+  /* Check for interleaving case for "large enough" initializer.
+     Currently we handle following cases:
+     (a) Even part is dup and odd part is const.
+     (b) Odd part is dup and even part is const.
+     (c) Both even and odd parts are dup.  */
 
   if (n_elts >= 8)
     {
-      int i;
-      for (i = 2; i < n_elts; i++)
-	if (!rtx_equal_p (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i), XVECEXP (vals, 0, i % 2)))
-	  break;
+      bool even_dup = false, even_const = false;
+      bool odd_dup = false, odd_const = false;
+
+      even_dup = aarch64_init_interleaving_dup_p (vals, 0);
+      if (!even_dup)
+	even_const = aarch64_init_interleaving_const_p (vals, 0);
+
+      odd_dup = aarch64_init_interleaving_dup_p (vals, 1);
+      if (!odd_dup)
+	odd_const = aarch64_init_interleaving_const_p (vals, 1);
+
+      /* This case should already be handled above when all elements are constants.  */
+      gcc_assert (!(even_const && odd_const));
 
-      if (i == n_elts)
+      if (even_dup && odd_const)
+	{
+	  rtx dup_reg = expand_vector_broadcast (mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, 0));
+	  dup_reg = force_reg (mode, dup_reg);
+
+	  rtx const_reg = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
+	  rtx const_vector = aarch64_init_interleaving_shift_init (vals, false);
+	  aarch64_expand_vector_init (const_reg, const_vector);
+
+	  rtvec v = gen_rtvec (2, dup_reg, const_reg);
+	  emit_set_insn (target, gen_rtx_UNSPEC (mode, v, UNSPEC_ZIP1));
+	  return;
+	}
+      else if (odd_dup && even_const)
+	{
+	  rtx dup_reg = expand_vector_broadcast (mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, 1));
+	  dup_reg = force_reg (mode, dup_reg);
+
+	  rtx const_reg = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
+	  rtx const_vector = aarch64_init_interleaving_shift_init (vals, true);
+	  aarch64_expand_vector_init (const_reg, const_vector);
+
+	  rtvec v = gen_rtvec (2, const_reg, dup_reg);
+	  emit_set_insn (target, gen_rtx_UNSPEC (mode, v, UNSPEC_ZIP1));
+	  return;
+	}
+      else if (even_dup && odd_dup)
 	{
 	  machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (target);
 	  rtx dest[2];
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-2.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3ad06c00451
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
+/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
+
+#include "arm_neon.h"
+
+/*
+**foo:
+**	...
+**	dup	v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
+**	adrp	x[0-9]+, .LC[0-9]+
+**	ldr	q[0-9]+, \[x[0-9]+, #:lo12:.LC[0-9]+\]
+**	zip1	v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
+**	...
+*/
+
+int16x8_t foo(int16_t x)
+{
+  return (int16x8_t) { x, 1, x, 2, x, 3, x, 4 }; 
+}
+
+
+/*
+**foo2:
+**	...
+**	dup	v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
+**	adrp	x[0-9]+, .LC[0-9]+
+**	ldr	q[0-9]+, \[x[0-9]+, #:lo12:.LC[0-9]+\]
+**	zip1	v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
+**	...
+*/
+
+int16x8_t foo2(int16_t x)
+{
+  return (int16x8_t) { 1, x, 2, x, 3, x, 4, x };
+}
+
+/*
+**foo3:
+**	...
+**	dup	v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.h\[0\]
+**	adrp	x[0-9]+, .LC[0-9]+
+**	ldr	q[0-9]+, \[x[0-9]+, #:lo12:.LC[0-9]+\]
+**	zip1	v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
+**	...
+*/
+
+float16x8_t foo3(float16_t x)
+{
+  return (float16x8_t) { x, 1.0, x, 2.0, x, 3.0, x, 4.0 };
+}

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-26  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-29 14:39 Prathamesh Kulkarni
2022-11-29 15:13 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-11-29 17:06   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2022-12-05 10:52 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-05 11:20   ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-06  1:31     ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2022-12-26  4:22       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni [this message]
2023-01-12 15:51         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-01  9:36           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-01 16:26             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-02 14:51               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-02 15:20                 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-03  1:40                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-03  3:02                     ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-03 15:17                       ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-04  6:49                         ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-06 12:13                           ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-11  9:12                             ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-03-10 18:08                               ` Richard Sandiford
2023-03-13  7:33                                 ` Richard Biener
2023-04-03 16:33                                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-04 18:05                                     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-06 10:26                                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-06 10:34                                         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-06 11:21                                           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-12  8:59                                             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-21  7:27                                               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-21  9:17                                                 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-21 15:15                                                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-23  1:53                                                     ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-24  9:29                                                       ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-04 11:47                                                         ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-11 19:07                                                           ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-13  9:10                                                             ` Prathamesh Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAAgBjMnMpzNDYcDFOmzyLUi4zhepdp3AttbhC1ODKK2NQ=xvnQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).