public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org>
Cc: gcc Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [aarch64] Use dup and zip1 for interleaving elements in initializing vector
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 11:20:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mptfsdugkqv.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mptedte15sh.fsf@arm.com> (Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches's message of "Mon, 05 Dec 2022 10:52:30 +0000")

Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Prathamesh Kulkarni <prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org> writes:
>> Hi,
>> For the following test-case:
>>
>> int16x8_t foo(int16_t x, int16_t y)
>> {
>>   return (int16x8_t) { x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y };
>> }
>>
>> Code gen at -O3:
>> foo:
>>         dup    v0.8h, w0
>>         ins     v0.h[1], w1
>>         ins     v0.h[3], w1
>>         ins     v0.h[5], w1
>>         ins     v0.h[7], w1
>>         ret
>>
>> For 16 elements, it results in 8 ins instructions which might not be
>> optimal perhaps.
>> I guess, the above code-gen would be equivalent to the following ?
>> dup v0.8h, w0
>> dup v1.8h, w1
>> zip1 v0.8h, v0.8h, v1.8h
>>
>> I have attached patch to do the same, if number of elements >= 8,
>> which should be possibly better compared to current code-gen ?
>> Patch passes bootstrap+test on aarch64-linux-gnu.
>> Does the patch look OK ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Prathamesh
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
>> index c91df6f5006..e5dea70e363 100644
>> --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc
>> @@ -22028,6 +22028,39 @@ aarch64_expand_vector_init (rtx target, rtx vals)
>>        return;
>>      }
>>  
>> +  /* Check for interleaving case.
>> +     For eg if initializer is (int16x8_t) {x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y}.
>> +     Generate following code:
>> +     dup v0.h, x
>> +     dup v1.h, y
>> +     zip1 v0.h, v0.h, v1.h
>> +     for "large enough" initializer.  */
>> +
>> +  if (n_elts >= 8)
>> +    {
>> +      int i;
>> +      for (i = 2; i < n_elts; i++)
>> +	if (!rtx_equal_p (XVECEXP (vals, 0, i), XVECEXP (vals, 0, i % 2)))
>> +	  break;
>> +
>> +      if (i == n_elts)
>> +	{
>> +	  machine_mode mode = GET_MODE (target);
>> +	  rtx dest[2];
>> +
>> +	  for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
>> +	    {
>> +	      rtx x = copy_to_mode_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), XVECEXP (vals, 0, i));
>
> Formatting nit: long line.
>
>> +	      dest[i] = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
>> +	      aarch64_emit_move (dest[i], gen_vec_duplicate (mode, x));
>> +	    }
>
> This could probably be written:
>
> 	  for (int i = 0; i < 2; i++)
> 	    {
> 	      rtx x = expand_vector_broadcast (mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, i));
> 	      dest[i] = force_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), x);

Oops, I meant "mode" rather than "GET_MODE_INNER (mode)", sorry.

> 	    }
>
> which avoids forcing constant elements into a register before the duplication.
> OK with that change if it works.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>> +
>> +	  rtvec v = gen_rtvec (2, dest[0], dest[1]);
>> +	  emit_set_insn (target, gen_rtx_UNSPEC (mode, v, UNSPEC_ZIP1));
>> +	  return;
>> +	}
>> +    }
>> +
>>    enum insn_code icode = optab_handler (vec_set_optab, mode);
>>    gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing);
>>  
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000000..ee775048589
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/interleave-init-1.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>> +/* { dg-options "-O3" } */
>> +/* { dg-final { check-function-bodies "**" "" "" } } */
>> +
>> +#include <arm_neon.h>
>> +
>> +/*
>> +** foo:
>> +**	...
>> +**	dup	v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
>> +**	dup	v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
>> +**	zip1	v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
>> +**	...
>> +**	ret
>> +*/
>> +
>> +int16x8_t foo(int16_t x, int y)
>> +{
>> +  int16x8_t v = (int16x8_t) {x, y, x, y, x, y, x, y}; 
>> +  return v;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> +** foo2:
>> +**	...
>> +**	dup	v[0-9]+\.8h, w[0-9]+
>> +**	movi	v[0-9]+\.8h, 0x1
>> +**	zip1	v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h, v[0-9]+\.8h
>> +**	...
>> +**	ret
>> +*/
>> +
>> +int16x8_t foo2(int16_t x) 
>> +{
>> +  int16x8_t v = (int16x8_t) {x, 1, x, 1, x, 1, x, 1}; 
>> +  return v;
>> +}

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-05 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-29 14:39 Prathamesh Kulkarni
2022-11-29 15:13 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-11-29 17:06   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2022-12-05 10:52 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-05 11:20   ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2022-12-06  1:31     ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2022-12-26  4:22       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-01-12 15:51         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-01  9:36           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-01 16:26             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-02 14:51               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-02 15:20                 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-03  1:40                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-03  3:02                     ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-03 15:17                       ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-04  6:49                         ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-02-06 12:13                           ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-11  9:12                             ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-03-10 18:08                               ` Richard Sandiford
2023-03-13  7:33                                 ` Richard Biener
2023-04-03 16:33                                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-04 18:05                                     ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-06 10:26                                       ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-06 10:34                                         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-06 11:21                                           ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-12  8:59                                             ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-21  7:27                                               ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-21  9:17                                                 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-21 15:15                                                   ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-23  1:53                                                     ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-04-24  9:29                                                       ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-04 11:47                                                         ` Prathamesh Kulkarni
2023-05-11 19:07                                                           ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-13  9:10                                                             ` Prathamesh Kulkarni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mptfsdugkqv.fsf@arm.com \
    --to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=prathamesh.kulkarni@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).