public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] i386: Remove REG_OK_FOR_INDEX/REG_OK_FOR_BASE and their derivatives
@ 2023-04-21 14:41 Uros Bizjak
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Uros Bizjak @ 2023-04-21 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1218 bytes --]

x86 was converted to TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P long ago.  Remove
remnants of the conversion.  Also, cleanup the remaining macros a bit
by introducing INDEX_REGNO_P macro.

No functional change.

gcc/ChangeLog:

2023-04-21  Uroš Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>

    * config/i386/i386.h (REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P, REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P): Remove.
    (REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P,  REG_OK_FOR_BASE_NONSTRICT_P): Ditto.
    (REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_STRICT_P, REG_OK_FOR_BASE_STRICT_P): Ditto.

    (FIRST_INDEX_REG, LAST_INDEX_REG): New defines.
    (LEGACY_INDEX_REG_P, LEGACY_INDEX_REGNO_P): New macros.
    (INDEX_REG_P, INDEX_REGNO_P): Ditto.

    (REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_P): Use INDEX_REGNO_P predicates.

    (REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P): New macro.
    (EG_OK_FOR_BASE_NONSTRICT_P): Ditto.

    * config/i386/predicates.md (index_register_operand):
    Use REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_P and REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P macros.

    * config/i386/i386.cc (ix86_legitimate_address_p): Use
    REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P, REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_NONSTRICT_P,
    REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_P and REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P macros.

Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu {,-m32}.

Pushed to master.

Uros.

[-- Attachment #2: p.diff.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6044 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
index fbd33a6bfd1..a3db55642e3 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.cc
@@ -11035,8 +11035,9 @@ ix86_legitimate_address_p (machine_mode, rtx addr, bool strict)
       if (reg == NULL_RTX)
 	return false;
 
-      if ((strict && ! REG_OK_FOR_BASE_STRICT_P (reg))
-	  || (! strict && ! REG_OK_FOR_BASE_NONSTRICT_P (reg)))
+      unsigned int regno = REGNO (reg);
+      if ((strict && !REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P (regno))
+	  || (!strict && !REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_NONSTRICT_P (regno)))
 	/* Base is not valid.  */
 	return false;
     }
@@ -11049,8 +11050,9 @@ ix86_legitimate_address_p (machine_mode, rtx addr, bool strict)
       if (reg == NULL_RTX)
 	return false;
 
-      if ((strict && ! REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_STRICT_P (reg))
-	  || (! strict && ! REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P (reg)))
+      unsigned int regno = REGNO (reg);
+      if ((strict && !REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_P (regno))
+	  || (!strict && !REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P (regno)))
 	/* Index is not valid.  */
 	return false;
     }
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
index 1da6dce8e0b..c7439f89bdf 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.h
@@ -1166,6 +1166,9 @@ extern const char *host_detect_local_cpu (int argc, const char **argv);
 #define FIRST_INT_REG AX_REG
 #define LAST_INT_REG  SP_REG
 
+#define FIRST_INDEX_REG AX_REG
+#define LAST_INDEX_REG  BP_REG
+
 #define FIRST_QI_REG AX_REG
 #define LAST_QI_REG  BX_REG
 
@@ -1404,7 +1407,11 @@ enum reg_class
 #define QI_REGNO_P(N) IN_RANGE ((N), FIRST_QI_REG, LAST_QI_REG)
 
 #define LEGACY_INT_REG_P(X) (REG_P (X) && LEGACY_INT_REGNO_P (REGNO (X)))
-#define LEGACY_INT_REGNO_P(N) (IN_RANGE ((N), FIRST_INT_REG, LAST_INT_REG))
+#define LEGACY_INT_REGNO_P(N) IN_RANGE ((N), FIRST_INT_REG, LAST_INT_REG)
+
+#define LEGACY_INDEX_REG_P(X) (REG_P (X) && LEGACY_INDEX_REGNO_P (REGNO (X)))
+#define LEGACY_INDEX_REGNO_P(N) \
+  IN_RANGE ((N), FIRST_INDEX_REG, LAST_INDEX_REG)
 
 #define REX_INT_REG_P(X) (REG_P (X) && REX_INT_REGNO_P (REGNO (X)))
 #define REX_INT_REGNO_P(N) \
@@ -1414,6 +1421,10 @@ enum reg_class
 #define GENERAL_REGNO_P(N) \
   (LEGACY_INT_REGNO_P (N) || REX_INT_REGNO_P (N))
 
+#define INDEX_REG_P(X) (REG_P (X) && INDEX_REGNO_P (REGNO (X)))
+#define INDEX_REGNO_P(N) \
+  (LEGACY_INDEX_REGNO_P (N) || REX_INT_REGNO_P (N))
+
 #define ANY_QI_REG_P(X) (REG_P (X) && ANY_QI_REGNO_P (REGNO (X)))
 #define ANY_QI_REGNO_P(N) \
   (TARGET_64BIT ? GENERAL_REGNO_P (N) : QI_REGNO_P (N))
@@ -1678,56 +1689,26 @@ typedef struct ix86_args {
    has been allocated, which happens in reginfo.cc during register
    allocation.  */
 
-#define REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_P(REGNO) 					\
-  ((REGNO) < STACK_POINTER_REGNUM 					\
-   || REX_INT_REGNO_P (REGNO)						\
-   || (unsigned) reg_renumber[(REGNO)] < STACK_POINTER_REGNUM		\
-   || REX_INT_REGNO_P ((unsigned) reg_renumber[(REGNO)]))
+#define REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_P(REGNO)					\
+  (INDEX_REGNO_P (REGNO)						\
+   || INDEX_REGNO_P (reg_renumber[(REGNO)]))
 
-#define REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P(REGNO) 					\
+#define REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P(REGNO)					\
   (GENERAL_REGNO_P (REGNO)						\
    || (REGNO) == ARG_POINTER_REGNUM 					\
    || (REGNO) == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM 					\
-   || GENERAL_REGNO_P ((unsigned) reg_renumber[(REGNO)]))
-
-/* The macros REG_OK_FOR..._P assume that the arg is a REG rtx
-   and check its validity for a certain class.
-   We have two alternate definitions for each of them.
-   The usual definition accepts all pseudo regs; the other rejects
-   them unless they have been allocated suitable hard regs.
-   The symbol REG_OK_STRICT causes the latter definition to be used.
-
-   Most source files want to accept pseudo regs in the hope that
-   they will get allocated to the class that the insn wants them to be in.
-   Source files for reload pass need to be strict.
-   After reload, it makes no difference, since pseudo regs have
-   been eliminated by then.  */
-
+   || GENERAL_REGNO_P (reg_renumber[(REGNO)]))
 
 /* Non strict versions, pseudos are ok.  */
-#define REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P(X)					\
-  (REGNO (X) < STACK_POINTER_REGNUM					\
-   || REX_INT_REGNO_P (REGNO (X))					\
-   || REGNO (X) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
+#define REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P(REGNO)				\
+  (INDEX_REGNO_P (REGNO)						\
+   || !HARD_REGISTER_NUM_P (REGNO))
 
-#define REG_OK_FOR_BASE_NONSTRICT_P(X)					\
-  (GENERAL_REGNO_P (REGNO (X))						\
-   || REGNO (X) == ARG_POINTER_REGNUM					\
-   || REGNO (X) == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM 				\
-   || REGNO (X) >= FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER)
-
-/* Strict versions, hard registers only */
-#define REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_STRICT_P(X) REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_P (REGNO (X))
-#define REG_OK_FOR_BASE_STRICT_P(X)  REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_P (REGNO (X))
-
-#ifndef REG_OK_STRICT
-#define REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P(X)  REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P (X)
-#define REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P(X)   REG_OK_FOR_BASE_NONSTRICT_P (X)
-
-#else
-#define REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_P(X)  REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_STRICT_P (X)
-#define REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P(X)   REG_OK_FOR_BASE_STRICT_P (X)
-#endif
+#define REGNO_OK_FOR_BASE_NONSTRICT_P(REGNO)				\
+  (GENERAL_REGNO_P (REGNO)						\
+   || (REGNO) == ARG_POINTER_REGNUM					\
+   || (REGNO) == FRAME_POINTER_REGNUM					\
+   || !HARD_REGISTER_NUM_P (REGNO))
 
 /* TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recognizes an RTL expression
    that is a valid memory address for an instruction.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md b/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
index e752e20dc73..91400d7d8fb 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/predicates.md
@@ -728,10 +728,11 @@ (define_predicate "index_register_operand"
   if (SUBREG_P (op))
     op = SUBREG_REG (op);
 
+  unsigned int regno = REGNO (op);
   if (reload_completed)
-    return REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_STRICT_P (op);
+    return REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_P (regno);
   else
-    return REG_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P (op);
+    return REGNO_OK_FOR_INDEX_NONSTRICT_P (regno);
 })
 
 ;; Return false if this is any eliminable register.  Otherwise general_operand.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2023-04-21 14:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-04-21 14:41 [PATCH] i386: Remove REG_OK_FOR_INDEX/REG_OK_FOR_BASE and their derivatives Uros Bizjak

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).