* PING^2: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with "equivalence map" for condition prediction
@ 2022-09-07 7:30 Di Zhao OS
2022-09-22 12:34 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Di Zhao OS @ 2022-09-07 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Richard Biener
Gentle ping again.
Thanks,
Di Zhao
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Di Zhao OS
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 2:08 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> Cc: 'Richard Biener' <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
> Subject: PING: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with
> "equivalence map" for condition prediction
>
> Updated the patch in the attachment, so it can apply.
>
> Thanks,
> Di Zhao
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Di Zhao OS
> > Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 11:59 PM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with "equivalence
> > map" for condition prediction
> >
> > Hi, attached is a new version of the patch. The changes are:
> > - Skip using temporary equivalences for floating-point values, because
> > folding expressions can generate incorrect values. For example,
> > operations on 0.0 and -0.0 may have different results.
> > - Avoid inserting duplicated back-refs from value-number to predicates.
> > - Disable fre in testsuite/g++.dg/pr83541.C .
> >
> > Summary of the previous versions:
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587346.html
> >
> > Is the patch still considered?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Di Zhao
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Extend FRE with temporary equivalences.
> >
> > 2022-05-29 Di Zhao <dizhao@os.amperecomputing.com>
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > PR tree-optimization/101186
> > * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (VN_INFO): remove assertions (there could be a
> > predicate already).
> > (dominated_by_p_w_unex): Moved upward.
> > (vn_nary_op_get_predicated_value): Moved upward.
> > (is_vn_valid_at_bb): Check if vn_pval is valid at BB.
> > (lookup_equiv_head): Lookup the "equivalence head" of given node.
> > (lookup_equiv_heads): Lookup the "equivalence head"s of given nodes.
> > (vn_tracking_edge): Extracted utility function.
> > (init_vn_nary_op_from_stmt): Insert and lookup by "equivalence
> head"s.
> > (vn_nary_op_insert_into): Insert new value at the front.
> > (vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated_1): Insert as predicated values
> > from pieces.
> > (fold_const_from_equiv_heads): Fold N-ary expression of equiv-heads.
> > (push_new_nary_ref): Insert a back-reference to vn_nary_op_t.
> > (val_equiv_insert): Record temporary equivalence.
> > (vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated): Record equivalences instead
> of
> > some predicates; insert back-refs.
> > (record_equiv_from_prev_phi_1): Record temporary equivalences
> > generated
> > by PHI nodes.
> > (record_equiv_from_prev_phi): Given an outgoing edge of a
> conditional
> > expression taken, record equivalences generated by PHI nodes.
> > (visit_nary_op): Add lookup previous results of N-ary operations by
> > equivalences.
> > (insert_related_predicates_on_edge): Some predicates can be computed
> > from equivalences, no need to insert them.
> > (process_bb): Add lookup predicated values by equivalences.
> > (struct unwind_state): Unwind state of back-refs to vn_nary_op_t.
> > (do_unwind): Unwind the back-refs to vn_nary_op_t.
> > (do_rpo_vn): Update back-reference unwind state.
> > * tree-ssa-sccvn.h (struct nary_ref): hold a lists of references to
> > the
> > nary map entries.
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * g++.dg/pr83541.C: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68619-2.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-1.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-2.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-3.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-5.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-7.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-8.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-9.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp03.c: Disable fre.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c: New test.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-101.c: New test.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-102.c: New test.
> > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-pre-34.c: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PING^2: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with "equivalence map" for condition prediction
2022-09-07 7:30 PING^2: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with "equivalence map" for condition prediction Di Zhao OS
@ 2022-09-22 12:34 ` Richard Biener
2022-09-22 12:36 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2022-09-22 12:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Di Zhao OS; +Cc: gcc-patches
On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:30 AM Di Zhao OS <dizhao@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
>
> Gentle ping again.
So I got the chance to review the change again on the travel to GNU
Cauldron 2022.
There's quite some factoring / moving of stuff in the patch. I've
already pushed to trunk
a change that factores out can_track_predicate_on_edge (your vn_tracking_edge),
factoring out is_vn_valid_at_bb also looks useful, so I'll followup
with a similar change.
I'm going to attach a commented quoted patch (because that's what I
produced during
the travel). An overall comment (also in that attachment) would be
"why are equivalences recorded in the expression hash table at all? Are
they not predicated values of an SSA name and thus should be a
vn_pval chain in vn_ssa_aux itself?
conditional equivalences are expensive to handle (so are the existing
predicated values which I do not like too much and which, frankly, I've
probably designed too general - ATM we only ever insert predicated
values 'true' and 'false' which could be used to simplify a lot of logic
but would break this patch?)
At some point I wanted to see whether we can use ranger relations
for all of this.
Then, for "true" equivalence tracking it might be interesting to explore
"path value numbering", aka allow revisiting code from the equivalence
op defs to the equivalence producing edge(s) with the equivalence fully
reflected in the value number. The interesting thing might be that we
can track whether there's any equivalence on the side and based on
use heuristic decide whether that's going to pay off. It might be also
possible to re-use this to improve jump threading costing. If we'd be
able to "fork" the VN state we could re-run from the later definition
of an equivalence to the point it is established.
So, overall I wasn't able to get at what this patch will catch and what
it will not catch - that is, to what extent equivalences affect
previously and future recorded expressions. Plus the implementation
feels like it bolts on the wrong place.
As I'm not happy with my predicated values implementation either I'm
of course a bit biased here (note the implementation was mostly added
to avoid regressions with respect to the previous VN implementation
and I should probably make it less general and more optimized - but
as said, using ranger might be an option here).
You have one testcase, ssa-fre-102.c, that seems to require VN
with equivalences, the others should be catched by rangers relation
handling, no?"
I've looked into using ranger for what the existing predicated value
handling does, plus catch more cases transparently. I'm not sure
rangers equivalences handling is a good fit so to handle those an
approach like yours might be necessary. Note I'm not really happy
about the patch as-is (nor I am happy about what I implemented
with predicated values - sorry for that). I'm not even sure equivalences
can be handled "nicely" :/
Thanks,
Richard.
> Thanks,
> Di Zhao
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Di Zhao OS
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 2:08 AM
> > To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
> > Cc: 'Richard Biener' <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
> > Subject: PING: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with
> > "equivalence map" for condition prediction
> >
> > Updated the patch in the attachment, so it can apply.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Di Zhao
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Di Zhao OS
> > > Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2022 11:59 PM
> > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> > > Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
> > > Subject: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with "equivalence
> > > map" for condition prediction
> > >
> > > Hi, attached is a new version of the patch. The changes are:
> > > - Skip using temporary equivalences for floating-point values, because
> > > folding expressions can generate incorrect values. For example,
> > > operations on 0.0 and -0.0 may have different results.
> > > - Avoid inserting duplicated back-refs from value-number to predicates.
> > > - Disable fre in testsuite/g++.dg/pr83541.C .
> > >
> > > Summary of the previous versions:
> > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-December/587346.html
> > >
> > > Is the patch still considered?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Di Zhao
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Extend FRE with temporary equivalences.
> > >
> > > 2022-05-29 Di Zhao <dizhao@os.amperecomputing.com>
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > > PR tree-optimization/101186
> > > * tree-ssa-sccvn.c (VN_INFO): remove assertions (there could be a
> > > predicate already).
> > > (dominated_by_p_w_unex): Moved upward.
> > > (vn_nary_op_get_predicated_value): Moved upward.
> > > (is_vn_valid_at_bb): Check if vn_pval is valid at BB.
> > > (lookup_equiv_head): Lookup the "equivalence head" of given node.
> > > (lookup_equiv_heads): Lookup the "equivalence head"s of given nodes.
> > > (vn_tracking_edge): Extracted utility function.
> > > (init_vn_nary_op_from_stmt): Insert and lookup by "equivalence
> > head"s.
> > > (vn_nary_op_insert_into): Insert new value at the front.
> > > (vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated_1): Insert as predicated values
> > > from pieces.
> > > (fold_const_from_equiv_heads): Fold N-ary expression of equiv-heads.
> > > (push_new_nary_ref): Insert a back-reference to vn_nary_op_t.
> > > (val_equiv_insert): Record temporary equivalence.
> > > (vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated): Record equivalences instead
> > of
> > > some predicates; insert back-refs.
> > > (record_equiv_from_prev_phi_1): Record temporary equivalences
> > > generated
> > > by PHI nodes.
> > > (record_equiv_from_prev_phi): Given an outgoing edge of a
> > conditional
> > > expression taken, record equivalences generated by PHI nodes.
> > > (visit_nary_op): Add lookup previous results of N-ary operations by
> > > equivalences.
> > > (insert_related_predicates_on_edge): Some predicates can be computed
> > > from equivalences, no need to insert them.
> > > (process_bb): Add lookup predicated values by equivalences.
> > > (struct unwind_state): Unwind state of back-refs to vn_nary_op_t.
> > > (do_unwind): Unwind the back-refs to vn_nary_op_t.
> > > (do_rpo_vn): Update back-reference unwind state.
> > > * tree-ssa-sccvn.h (struct nary_ref): hold a lists of references to
> > > the
> > > nary map entries.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > > * g++.dg/pr83541.C: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68619-2.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-1.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-2.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-3.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-5.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-7.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-8.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-9.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp03.c: Disable fre.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-100.c: New test.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-101.c: New test.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-fre-102.c: New test.
> > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-pre-34.c: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PING^2: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with "equivalence map" for condition prediction
2022-09-22 12:34 ` Richard Biener
@ 2022-09-22 12:36 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2022-09-22 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Di Zhao OS; +Cc: gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3201 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 22, 2022 at 2:34 PM Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 9:30 AM Di Zhao OS <dizhao@os.amperecomputing.com> wrote:
> >
> > Gentle ping again.
>
> So I got the chance to review the change again on the travel to GNU
> Cauldron 2022.
>
> There's quite some factoring / moving of stuff in the patch. I've
> already pushed to trunk
> a change that factores out can_track_predicate_on_edge (your vn_tracking_edge),
> factoring out is_vn_valid_at_bb also looks useful, so I'll followup
> with a similar change.
>
> I'm going to attach a commented quoted patch (because that's what I
> produced during
> the travel). An overall comment (also in that attachment) would be
>
> "why are equivalences recorded in the expression hash table at all? Are
> they not predicated values of an SSA name and thus should be a
> vn_pval chain in vn_ssa_aux itself?
>
> conditional equivalences are expensive to handle (so are the existing
> predicated values which I do not like too much and which, frankly, I've
> probably designed too general - ATM we only ever insert predicated
> values 'true' and 'false' which could be used to simplify a lot of logic
> but would break this patch?)
>
> At some point I wanted to see whether we can use ranger relations
> for all of this.
>
> Then, for "true" equivalence tracking it might be interesting to explore
> "path value numbering", aka allow revisiting code from the equivalence
> op defs to the equivalence producing edge(s) with the equivalence fully
> reflected in the value number. The interesting thing might be that we
> can track whether there's any equivalence on the side and based on
> use heuristic decide whether that's going to pay off. It might be also
> possible to re-use this to improve jump threading costing. If we'd be
> able to "fork" the VN state we could re-run from the later definition
> of an equivalence to the point it is established.
>
> So, overall I wasn't able to get at what this patch will catch and what
> it will not catch - that is, to what extent equivalences affect
> previously and future recorded expressions. Plus the implementation
> feels like it bolts on the wrong place.
>
> As I'm not happy with my predicated values implementation either I'm
> of course a bit biased here (note the implementation was mostly added
> to avoid regressions with respect to the previous VN implementation
> and I should probably make it less general and more optimized - but
> as said, using ranger might be an option here).
>
> You have one testcase, ssa-fre-102.c, that seems to require VN
> with equivalences, the others should be catched by rangers relation
> handling, no?"
>
> I've looked into using ranger for what the existing predicated value
> handling does, plus catch more cases transparently. I'm not sure
> rangers equivalences handling is a good fit so to handle those an
> approach like yours might be necessary. Note I'm not really happy
> about the patch as-is (nor I am happy about what I implemented
> with predicated values - sorry for that). I'm not even sure equivalences
> can be handled "nicely" :/
Meh, I said I would attach something. Here it is.
Richard.
[-- Attachment #2: review --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 37463 bytes --]
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr83541.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr83541.C
> index f5b181e064a..c9a550a6d08 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr83541.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr83541.C
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> // PR tree-optimization/83541
> // { dg-do compile }
> -// { dg-options "-O3 -std=c++17 -ffast-math -fdump-tree-evrp" }
> +// { dg-options "-O3 -fno-tree-fre -std=c++17 -ffast-math -fdump-tree-evrp" }
>
> #include <limits>
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68619-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68619-2.c
> index cca706e0c4f..0a99c3c620e 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68619-2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr68619-2.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-dom2-details -w" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-dom2-details -w" } */
>
> typedef union tree_node *tree;
> struct gcc_options
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-1.c
> index ac8271cc574..e9a797e82b0 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-1.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
>
>
> int f(int x, int y)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-2.c
> index b2c09cbb021..bcbc419575c 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-2.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-2.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
>
>
> int f(int x, int y)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-3.c
> index 2316f7e1c04..d63291da440 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-3.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-3.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
>
> int f(int x, int y)
> {
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-5.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-5.c
> index e7038d0237f..c1e5667b45a 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-5.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-5.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
>
>
> static inline long load(long *p)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-7.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-7.c
> index b44c064aa23..069e4a106c3 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-7.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-7.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
>
>
> int f(int x, int y)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-8.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-8.c
> index 26e5abbdc29..26b303e896e 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-8.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-8.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
>
>
> int f(int x, int y)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-9.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-9.c
> index 22b68d5ede0..3ed3bf6ad29 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-9.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr71947-9.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-vrp -fno-tree-fre -fdump-tree-dom-details" } */
>
>
> int f(int x, int y)
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp03.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp03.c
> index 4cbaca41332..69b83b6cc30 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp03.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp03.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> -/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdisable-tree-evrp -fdump-tree-vrp1 -fno-thread-jumps" } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdisable-tree-evrp -fdump-tree-vrp1 -fno-thread-jumps -fno-tree-fre" } */
>
> struct A
> {
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
> index 74b8d8d18ef..86a4798af94 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.cc
> @@ -355,6 +355,8 @@ static vn_reference_t last_inserted_ref;
> static vn_phi_t last_inserted_phi;
> static vn_nary_op_t last_inserted_nary;
> static vn_ssa_aux_t last_pushed_avail;
> +static vn_ssa_aux_t last_pushed_nary_ref;
> +static nary_ref* nary_ref_freelist;
>
> /* Valid hashtables storing information we have proven to be
> correct. */
> @@ -490,9 +492,9 @@ VN_INFO (tree name)
> nary->predicated_values = 0;
> nary->u.result = boolean_true_node;
> vn_nary_op_insert_into (nary, valid_info->nary);
> - gcc_assert (nary->unwind_to == NULL);
why's that? doesn't this mean unwinding will be broken?
> /* Also do not link it into the undo chain. */
> last_inserted_nary = nary->next;
> + /* There could be a predicate already. */
> nary->next = (vn_nary_op_t)(void *)-1;
> nary = alloc_vn_nary_op_noinit (2, &vn_tables_insert_obstack);
> init_vn_nary_op_from_pieces (nary, 2, EQ_EXPR,
> @@ -500,7 +502,6 @@ VN_INFO (tree name)
> nary->predicated_values = 0;
> nary->u.result = boolean_false_node;
> vn_nary_op_insert_into (nary, valid_info->nary);
> - gcc_assert (nary->unwind_to == NULL);
> last_inserted_nary = nary->next;
> nary->next = (vn_nary_op_t)(void *)-1;
> if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> @@ -4093,6 +4094,121 @@ vn_reference_insert_pieces (tree vuse, alias_set_type set,
> return vr1;
> }
>
> +static bool
> +dominated_by_p_w_unex (basic_block bb1, basic_block bb2, bool);
> +
> +static tree
> +vn_nary_op_get_predicated_value (vn_nary_op_t vno, basic_block bb)
> +{
> + if (! vno->predicated_values)
> + return vno->u.result;
> + for (vn_pval *val = vno->u.values; val; val = val->next)
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < val->n; ++i)
> + {
> + /* Do not handle backedge executability optimistically since
> + when figuring out whether to iterate we do not consider
> + changed predication. */
> + if (dominated_by_p_w_unex (
> + bb, BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, val->valid_dominated_by_p[i]),
> + false))
> + return val->result;
> + }
> + return NULL_TREE;
> +}
> +
> +/* Whether a predicated value VAL is valid at BB. */
> +
> +static inline bool
> +is_vn_valid_at_bb (vn_pval *val, basic_block bb)
> +{
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < val->n; ++i)
> + {
> + basic_block val_bb
> + = BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, val->valid_dominated_by_p[i]);
> + if (dominated_by_p_w_unex (bb, val_bb, false))
> + return true;
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
Please use this function in vn_nary_op_get_predicated_value
> +
> +/* Lookup the variable that represents a set of equivalences of NAME at
> + basic-block BB. This variable is called the "equivalence head" of NAME. */
> +
> +static tree
> +lookup_equiv_head (tree name, basic_block bb)
> +{
> + if (TREE_CODE (name) != SSA_NAME)
> + return name;
> + tree result = VN_INFO (name)->valnum;
> + if (result == VN_TOP)
> + /* VN_TOP is not allowed, otherwise it will be too optimistic for
> + non-iterating mode. */
> + return name;
> +
> + /* Folding expressions from equivalences can generate incorrect values.
> + For excample, operations on 0.0 and -0.0. So for floating-point values,
> + equivalences are not used. */
> + if (FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (name)))
> + return result;
> +
> + vn_nary_op_t vnresult;
> + /* As we insert new value at front in vn_nary_op_insert_into, we don't need
> + search iteratively for the most general equiv-head. */
> + vn_nary_op_lookup_pieces (1, NOP_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (result), &result,
> + &vnresult);
> + if (vnresult && vnresult->predicated_values)
> + {
> + tree eq = vn_nary_op_get_predicated_value (vnresult, bb);
> + if (eq)
> + return eq;
> + }
> + return result;
> +}
> +
> +/* Lookup the "equivalence head"s of OPS at BB, and store them in TO. N is the
> + size of OPS. */
> +
> +static void
> +lookup_equiv_heads (unsigned n, tree *ops, tree *to, basic_block bb)
> +{
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; i++)
> + {
> + tree equiv_head = lookup_equiv_head (ops[i], bb);
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS) && equiv_head != ops[i])
> + {
> + fprintf (dump_file, "Use equiv-head ");
> + print_generic_expr (dump_file, equiv_head, TDF_NONE);
> + fprintf (dump_file, " for ");
> + print_generic_expr (dump_file, ops[i], TDF_NONE);
> + fprintf (dump_file, "\n");
> + }
> + to[i] = equiv_head;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* Returns whether edge PRED_E is currently being tracked. */
> +
> +static inline bool
> +vn_tracking_edge (edge pred_e)
> +{
> + if (!single_pred_p (pred_e->dest))
> + {
> + /* Never record for backedges. */
> + if (pred_e->flags & EDGE_DFS_BACK)
> + return false;
> + edge_iterator ei;
> + edge e;
> + int cnt = 0;
> + /* Ignore backedges. */
> + FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, pred_e->dest->preds)
> + if (!dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, e->src, e->dest))
> + cnt++;
why check EDGE_DFS_BACK above but use dominance here? So an edge
is tracked if it is the single non-backedge into the destination?
> + if (cnt != 1)
> + return false;
> + }
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> /* Compute and return the hash value for nary operation VBO1. */
>
> hashval_t
> @@ -4226,6 +4342,9 @@ init_vn_nary_op_from_stmt (vn_nary_op_t vno, gassign *stmt)
> for (i = 0; i < vno->length; ++i)
> vno->op[i] = gimple_op (stmt, i + 1);
> }
> + /* Insert and lookup N-ary results by the operands' equivalence heads. */
> + if (gimple_bb (stmt))
> + lookup_equiv_heads (vno->length, vno->op, vno->op, gimple_bb (stmt));
That seems like the wrong place, the function didn't even valueize before.
> }
>
> /* Compute the hashcode for VNO and look for it in the hash table;
> @@ -4370,13 +4489,13 @@ vn_nary_op_insert_into (vn_nary_op_t vno, vn_nary_op_table_type *table)
> basic_block vno_bb
> = BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, vno->u.values->valid_dominated_by_p[0]);
> vn_pval *nval = vno->u.values;
> + /* Avoid inserting duplicated result. */
> + vno->u.values = NULL;
> vn_pval **next = &vno->u.values;
> - bool found = false;
> for (vn_pval *val = (*slot)->u.values; val; val = val->next)
> {
> if (expressions_equal_p (val->result, nval->result))
> {
> - found = true;
> for (unsigned i = 0; i < val->n; ++i)
> {
> basic_block val_bb
> @@ -4391,17 +4510,15 @@ vn_nary_op_insert_into (vn_nary_op_t vno, vn_nary_op_table_type *table)
> val_bb, vno_bb));
> }
> /* Append value. */
> - *next = (vn_pval *) obstack_alloc (&vn_tables_obstack,
> - sizeof (vn_pval)
> - + val->n * sizeof (int));
> - (*next)->next = NULL;
> - (*next)->result = val->result;
> - (*next)->n = val->n + 1;
> - memcpy ((*next)->valid_dominated_by_p,
> - val->valid_dominated_by_p,
> + nval = (vn_pval *) obstack_alloc (&vn_tables_obstack,
> + sizeof (vn_pval)
> + + val->n * sizeof (int));
> + nval->next = NULL;
> + nval->result = val->result;
> + nval->n = val->n + 1;
> + memcpy (nval->valid_dominated_by_p, val->valid_dominated_by_p,
> val->n * sizeof (int));
> - (*next)->valid_dominated_by_p[val->n] = vno_bb->index;
> - next = &(*next)->next;
> + nval->valid_dominated_by_p[val->n] = vno_bb->index;
> if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> fprintf (dump_file, "Appending predicate to value.\n");
> continue;
> @@ -4414,8 +4531,10 @@ vn_nary_op_insert_into (vn_nary_op_t vno, vn_nary_op_table_type *table)
> (*next)->next = NULL;
> next = &(*next)->next;
> }
> - if (!found)
> - *next = nval;
> + /* Put new result at front, so lookup_equiv_head can find the last
> + inserted (most general) result. */
> + nval->next = vno->u.values;
> + vno->u.values = nval;
>
> *slot = vno;
> vno->next = last_inserted_nary;
> @@ -4460,6 +4579,86 @@ vn_nary_op_insert_pieces (unsigned int length, enum tree_code code,
> return vn_nary_op_insert_into (vno1, valid_info->nary);
> }
>
> +/* Similar with vn_nary_op_insert_pieces, but insert as predicated values. */
> +
> +static vn_nary_op_t
> +vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated_1 (unsigned int length, enum tree_code code,
> + tree type, tree *ops, tree result,
> + unsigned int value_id, basic_block bb)
> +{
> + vn_nary_op_t vno1 = alloc_vn_nary_op (length, NULL_TREE, value_id);
> + init_vn_nary_op_from_pieces (vno1, length, code, type, ops);
> + vno1->predicated_values = 1;
> + vno1->u.values
> + = (vn_pval *) obstack_alloc (&vn_tables_obstack, sizeof (vn_pval));
> + vno1->u.values->next = NULL;
> + vno1->u.values->result = result;
> + vno1->u.values->n = 1;
> + vno1->u.values->valid_dominated_by_p[0] = bb->index;
> + return vn_nary_op_insert_into (vno1, valid_info->nary);
> +}
> +
> +/* Fold N-ary expression of equiv-heads, return NULL_TREE if not folded. */
> +
> +static tree
> +fold_const_from_equiv_heads (unsigned length, tree_code opcode, tree *op,
> + tree type)
> +{
> + tree result = NULL_TREE;
> + /* We're using equiv-heads, i.e. the most general operands, shortcut for
> + situations that can fold. */
> + switch (length)
> + {
> + case 1:
> + if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (op[0]))
> + result
> + = gimple_simplify (opcode, type, op[0], NULL, no_follow_ssa_edges);
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + if ((CONSTANT_CLASS_P (op[0]) && CONSTANT_CLASS_P (op[1]))
> + || op[0] == op[1])
> + result = gimple_simplify (opcode, type, op[0], op[1], NULL,
> + no_follow_ssa_edges);
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + if (CONSTANT_CLASS_P (op[0]) && CONSTANT_CLASS_P (op[1])
> + && CONSTANT_CLASS_P (op[2]))
> + result = gimple_simplify (opcode, type, op[0], op[1], op[2], NULL,
> + no_follow_ssa_edges);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> + if (result && !useless_type_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (result)))
> + result = fold_convert (type, result);
> + return result;
> +}
> +
> +/* Insert a back-reference to vn_nary_op_t in vn_ssa_aux. */
> +
> +static inline void
> +push_new_nary_ref (vn_nary_op_t slot, vn_ssa_aux_t info)
> +{
> + nary_ref *ref;
> + if (nary_ref_freelist)
> + {
> + ref = nary_ref_freelist;
> + nary_ref_freelist = nary_ref_freelist->next;
> + }
> + else
> + ref = XOBNEW (&vn_ssa_aux_obstack, nary_ref);
> + ref->next = info->ref;
> + ref->next_undo = last_pushed_nary_ref;
> + ref->slot = slot;
> + last_pushed_nary_ref = info;
> + info->ref = ref;
> + ++info->num_nary_ref;
> + gcc_assert (info->num_nary_ref > 0);
> +}
> +
> +static vn_nary_op_t
> +val_equiv_insert (tree op1, tree op2, edge e);
> +
> static vn_nary_op_t
> vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated (unsigned int length, enum tree_code code,
> tree type, tree *ops,
> @@ -4467,21 +4666,15 @@ vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated (unsigned int length, enum tree_code code,
> edge pred_e)
> {
> /* ??? Currently tracking BBs. */
> - if (! single_pred_p (pred_e->dest))
> - {
> - /* Never record for backedges. */
> - if (pred_e->flags & EDGE_DFS_BACK)
> - return NULL;
> - edge_iterator ei;
> - edge e;
> - int cnt = 0;
> - /* Ignore backedges. */
> - FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, pred_e->dest->preds)
> - if (! dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, e->src, e->dest))
> - cnt++;
> - if (cnt != 1)
> - return NULL;
> - }
> + if (!vn_tracking_edge (pred_e))
> + return NULL;
> + /* Equivalence can represent this. */
> + if (code == EQ_EXPR && result == boolean_true_node)
> + return val_equiv_insert (ops[0], ops[1], pred_e);
> + /* Leave this for inverted condition. */
> + if (code == NE_EXPR && result == boolean_false_node)
> + return NULL;
> +
> if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS)
> /* ??? Fix dumping, but currently we only get comparisons. */
> && TREE_CODE_CLASS (code) == tcc_comparison)
> @@ -4494,36 +4687,255 @@ vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated (unsigned int length, enum tree_code code,
> fprintf (dump_file, " == %s\n",
> integer_zerop (result) ? "false" : "true");
> }
> - vn_nary_op_t vno1 = alloc_vn_nary_op (length, NULL_TREE, value_id);
> - init_vn_nary_op_from_pieces (vno1, length, code, type, ops);
> - vno1->predicated_values = 1;
> - vno1->u.values = (vn_pval *) obstack_alloc (&vn_tables_obstack,
> - sizeof (vn_pval));
> - vno1->u.values->next = NULL;
> - vno1->u.values->result = result;
> - vno1->u.values->n = 1;
> - vno1->u.values->valid_dominated_by_p[0] = pred_e->dest->index;
> - return vn_nary_op_insert_into (vno1, valid_info->nary);
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < length; i++)
> + gcc_checking_assert (lookup_equiv_head (ops[i], pred_e->dest) == ops[i]);
> +
> + /* Skip if the result is known. (Caused by re-inserting predicates.) */
> + tree simplified = fold_const_from_equiv_heads (length, code, ops, type);
> + if (simplified)
> + {
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> + {
> + fprintf (dump_file, "Result is known: ");
> + print_generic_expr (dump_file, simplified, TDF_NONE);
> + fprintf (dump_file, ", skipped.\n");
> + }
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + vn_nary_op_t val
> + = vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated_1 (length, code, type, ops,
> + result, value_id, pred_e->dest);
> + /* Insert back-refs (operand->slot) to vn_ssa_aux structure. */
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < length; i++)
> + if (TREE_CODE (ops[i]) == SSA_NAME)
> + {
> + vn_ssa_aux_t info = VN_INFO (ops[i]);
> + if (info->valnum == ops[i])
> + push_new_nary_ref (val, info);
> + }
> + return val;
> }
>
> -static bool
> -dominated_by_p_w_unex (basic_block bb1, basic_block bb2, bool);
> +/* Record the equivalence of OP1 and OP2 on edge E. */
>
> -static tree
> -vn_nary_op_get_predicated_value (vn_nary_op_t vno, basic_block bb)
> +static vn_nary_op_t
> +val_equiv_insert (tree op1, tree op2, edge e)
> {
> - if (! vno->predicated_values)
> - return vno->u.result;
> + /* Record by equivalence heads. */
> + basic_block bb = e->dest;
> + tree lhs = lookup_equiv_head (op1, bb);
> + tree rhs = lookup_equiv_head (op2, bb);
> + if (lhs == rhs)
> + return NULL;
> + /* Set RHS to be new equiv-head for LHS. LHS must be SSA_NAME. */
> + if (TREE_CODE (lhs) != SSA_NAME)
> + {
> + if (TREE_CODE (rhs) == SSA_NAME)
> + std::swap (lhs, rhs);
> + else
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + vn_ssa_aux_t rhs_info = NULL, lhs_info = VN_INFO (lhs);
> +
> + /* Choose the hand-side with more recorded n-ary expressions as new
> + equivalence head, to make fewer re-insertions. */
> + if (TREE_CODE (rhs) == SSA_NAME)
> + {
> + rhs_info = VN_INFO (rhs);
> + if (rhs_info->num_nary_ref < lhs_info->num_nary_ref)
> + {
> + std::swap (lhs, rhs);
> + std::swap (rhs_info, lhs_info);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> + {
> + fprintf (dump_file, "Recording equivalence of ");
> + print_generic_expr (dump_file, lhs);
> + fprintf (dump_file, " and ");
> + print_generic_expr (dump_file, rhs);
> + fprintf (dump_file, " at BB%d\n", bb->index);
> + }
> + /* Record equivalence as unary NOP_EXPR. */
> + vn_nary_op_t val
> + = vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated_1 (1, NOP_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (lhs),
> + &lhs, rhs, 0, bb);
why are equivalences recorded in the expression hash table at all? Are
they not predicated values of an SSA name and thus should be a
vn_pval chain in vn_ssa_aux itself?
conditional equivalences are expensive to handle (so are the existing
predicated values which I do not like too much and which, frankly, I've
probably designed too general - ATM we only ever insert predicated
values 'true' and 'false' which could be used to simplify a lot of logic
but would break this patch?)
At some point I wanted to see whether we can use ranger relations
for all of this.
Then, for "true" equivalence tracking it might be interesting to explore
"path value numbering", aka allow revisiting code from the equivalence
op defs to the equivalence producing edge(s) with the equivalence fully
reflected in the value number. The interesting thing might be that we
can track whether there's any equivalence on the side and based on
use heuristic decide whether that's going to pay off. It might be also
possible to re-use this to improve jump threading costing.
So, overall I wasn't able to get at what this patch will catch and what
it will not catch - that is, to what extent equivalences affect
previously and future recorded expressions. Plus the implementation
feels like it bolts on the wrong place.
As I'm not happy with my predicated values implementation either I'm
of course a bit biased here (note the implementation was mostly added
to avoid regressions with respect to the previous VN implementation
and I should probably make it less general and more optimized - but
as said, using ranger might be an option here).
You have one testcase, ssa-fre-102.c, that seems to require VN
with equivalences, the others should be catched by rangers relation
handling, no?
> + /* Back-ref for equivalences is result->slot rather than op->slot, so that
> + when new equiv-head is appended, we can update them. */
> + if (TREE_CODE (rhs) == SSA_NAME)
> + push_new_nary_ref (val, rhs_info);
> +
> + /* Iterate on LHS's references, first update equiv-heads, then re-insert
> + former predicates, so that the result will be latest. */
> + hash_map<vn_nary_op_t, tree> predicates;
> + vn_nary_op_t slot;
> + tree old_head = lhs_info->valnum;
> + nary_ref *ref = lhs_info->ref;
> + for (; ref; ref = ref->next)
> + {
> + slot = ref->slot;
> + if (!slot->predicated_values)
> + continue;
> + /* Update recorded equivalences with new equiv-head. */
> + if (slot->opcode == NOP_EXPR && slot->length == 1)
> + {
> + if (slot->op[0] == rhs)
> + continue;
> + for (vn_pval *pval = slot->u.values; pval; pval = pval->next)
> + if (expressions_equal_p (pval->result, old_head)
> + && is_vn_valid_at_bb (pval, bb))
> + {
> + if (dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> + {
> + fprintf (dump_file, "Updating equiv-head of ");
> + print_generic_expr (dump_file, slot->op[0], TDF_SLIM);
> + fprintf (dump_file, " to ");
> + print_generic_expr (dump_file, rhs, TDF_SLIM);
> + fprintf (dump_file, " at BB%d\n", bb->index);
> + }
> + vn_nary_op_t new_val
> + = vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated_1 (1, NOP_EXPR,
> + slot->type, slot->op,
> + rhs, 0, bb);
> + /* Push back-ref (result->slot) for new equivalence. */
> + if (TREE_CODE (rhs) == SSA_NAME)
> + push_new_nary_ref (new_val, rhs_info);
> + }
> + }
> + else
> + /* Predicated values are collected, to be re-inserted later. */
> + for (vn_pval *pval = slot->u.values; pval; pval = pval->next)
> + {
> + if (!is_vn_valid_at_bb (pval, bb))
> + continue;
> + predicates.put (slot, pval->result);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!predicates.is_empty () && dump_file && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> + fprintf (dump_file, "Re-inserting %ld predicates...\n",
> + predicates.elements ());
> + tree new_ops[3];
> + for (auto i = predicates.begin (), end = predicates.end (); i != end; ++i)
> + {
> + vn_nary_op_t slot = (*i).first;
> + tree result = (*i).second;
> + lookup_equiv_heads (slot->length, slot->op, new_ops, e->dest);
> + vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated (slot->length, slot->opcode,
> + slot->type, new_ops, result,
> + slot->value_id, e);
> + }
> + return val;
> +}
> +
> +/* Record temporary equivalences generated by PHI nodes, and are valid when
> + BB's outgoing edge E is taken. VNO contains the interested expression.
> + RESULT is value that need to be ruled out. */
> +
> +static void
> +record_equiv_from_prev_phi_1 (vn_nary_op_t vno, edge e, basic_block bb,
> + tree result)
> +{
> + if (!(vno && vno->predicated_values))
> + return;
> +
> + /* Process predicated values in VNO, looking for a conflicting result, and
> + the location's single_pred dominates BB. */
> for (vn_pval *val = vno->u.values; val; val = val->next)
> - for (unsigned i = 0; i < val->n; ++i)
> - /* Do not handle backedge executability optimistically since
> - when figuring out whether to iterate we do not consider
> - changed predication. */
> - if (dominated_by_p_w_unex
> - (bb, BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, val->valid_dominated_by_p[i]),
> - false))
> - return val->result;
> - return NULL_TREE;
> + {
> + if (!expressions_equal_p (val->result, result))
> + continue;
> + /* Found a result to rule out, process each location. */
> + for (unsigned i = 0; i < val->n; ++i)
> + {
> + basic_block bb1
> + = BASIC_BLOCK_FOR_FN (cfun, val->valid_dominated_by_p[i]);
> + if (!single_pred_p (bb1))
> + continue;
> + basic_block p = single_pred (bb1);
> + if (!dominated_by_p_w_unex (bb, p, false))
> + continue;
> + gcc_assert (EDGE_COUNT (p->succs) == 2);
> + /* Iterate on possible phi_bbs (can be BB itself). Considering
> + non-executable edges, there can be multiple phi_bbs. */
> + for (basic_block phi_bb : get_dominated_by (CDI_DOMINATORS, p))
> + {
> + if (!dominated_by_p_w_unex (bb, phi_bb, false))
> + continue;
> + /* Process PHIs, rule out incoming edges that definitely come
> + from p->bb1. If there's a single PHI argument X left, record
> + the equivalence of X and PHI result at edge e. */
> + for (gphi_iterator gsi = gsi_start_nonvirtual_phis (phi_bb);
> + !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next_nonvirtual_phi (&gsi))
> + {
> + gphi *phi = gsi.phi ();
> + tree equiv = NULL_TREE;
> + for (unsigned j = 0; j < gimple_phi_num_args (phi); ++j)
> + {
> + edge in = gimple_phi_arg_edge (phi, j);
> + if (in->src == bb1
> + || dominated_by_p_w_unex (in->src, bb1, false))
> + /* Definitely comes from p->bb1. */
> + continue;
> + tree arg = vn_valueize (gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, j));
> + if (equiv && equiv != arg)
> + {
> + equiv = NULL_TREE;
> + break;
> + }
> + equiv = arg;
> + }
> + if (equiv)
> + val_equiv_insert (equiv, PHI_RESULT (phi), e);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +}
> +
> +/* Record temporary equivalences generated by PHI nodes, and are valid when
> + BB's outgoing edge E is taken. CODE, OPS and RESULT are the condition and
> + result for E to be taken. VNO contains the condition's results recorded in
> + nary map.
> +
> + The idea is to find a conflicting predicate at some location L, where L's
> + predecessor P dominates BB, so we know path P->L will not be taken if E is
> + taken. If by ruling out P->L can generate some equivalences, record them at
> + E->dest. */
> +
> +static void
> +record_equiv_from_prev_phi (vn_nary_op_t vno, edge e, basic_block bb,
> + tree_code code, tree *ops, tree result)
> +{
> + if (!vn_tracking_edge (e))
> + return;
> + tree reverse
> + = result == boolean_true_node ? boolean_false_node : boolean_true_node;
> + record_equiv_from_prev_phi_1 (vno, e, bb, reverse);
> +
> + /* For predicates like "a==b is false" or "a!=b is true", conflicting results
> + are equivalences, i.e. "NO_OP (a) is b" or "NO_OP (b) is a". */
> + if ((result == boolean_true_node
> + && (code == NE_EXPR || code == GT_EXPR || code == LT_EXPR))
> + || (result == boolean_false_node && code == EQ_EXPR))
> + {
> + vn_nary_op_t vnresult;
> + if (TREE_CODE (ops[0]) == SSA_NAME)
> + {
> + vn_nary_op_lookup_pieces (1, NOP_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (ops[0]), ops,
> + &vnresult);
> + record_equiv_from_prev_phi_1 (vnresult, e, bb, ops[1]);
> + }
> + if (TREE_CODE (ops[1]) == SSA_NAME)
> + {
> + vn_nary_op_lookup_pieces (1, NOP_EXPR, TREE_TYPE (ops[1]), &ops[1],
> + &vnresult);
> + record_equiv_from_prev_phi_1 (vnresult, e, bb, ops[0]);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> /* Insert the rhs of STMT into the current hash table with a value number of
> @@ -5149,8 +5561,25 @@ static bool
> visit_nary_op (tree lhs, gassign *stmt)
> {
> vn_nary_op_t vnresult;
> - tree result = vn_nary_op_lookup_stmt (stmt, &vnresult);
> - if (! result && vnresult)
> + unsigned length = vn_nary_length_from_stmt (stmt);
> + vn_nary_op_t vno
> + = XALLOCAVAR (struct vn_nary_op_s, sizeof_vn_nary_op (length));
> + init_vn_nary_op_from_stmt (vno, stmt);
> + tree result = NULL_TREE;
> + /* Try to get a simplified result. */
> + /* Do not simplify variable used in PHI at loop exit, or
> + simplify_peeled_chrec/constant_after_peeling may miss the loop. */
> + gimple *use_stmt;
> + use_operand_p use_p;
> + if (!(single_imm_use (lhs, &use_p, &use_stmt)
> + && gimple_code (use_stmt) == GIMPLE_PHI
> + && single_succ_p (gimple_bb (use_stmt))
> + && (single_succ_edge (gimple_bb (use_stmt))->flags & EDGE_DFS_BACK)))
> + result = fold_const_from_equiv_heads (vno->length, vno->opcode, vno->op,
> + vno->type);
copy propagating conditional equivalences has proved problematic, why
do this at all when there's no actual simplification? It's a bit odd that
we need a special fold_const_from_equiv_heads here, why is general
valueization not handling equivalences? Are they supposed to be only
used for simplifying conditionals?
> + if (!result)
> + result = vn_nary_op_lookup_1 (vno, &vnresult);
> + if (!result && vnresult)
> result = vn_nary_op_get_predicated_value (vnresult, gimple_bb (stmt));
> if (result)
> return set_ssa_val_to (lhs, result);
> @@ -7560,12 +7989,8 @@ insert_related_predicates_on_edge (enum tree_code code, tree *ops, edge pred_e)
> ops, boolean_false_node, 0, pred_e);
> break;
> case EQ_EXPR:
> - /* a == b -> ! a {<,>} b */
> - vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated (2, LT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
> - ops, boolean_false_node, 0, pred_e);
> - vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated (2, GT_EXPR, boolean_type_node,
> - ops, boolean_false_node, 0, pred_e);
> - break;
> + /* No need to insert derived predicates for '==', as they can be computed
> + by equiv-heads & fold_const_from_equiv_heads. */
> case LE_EXPR:
> case GE_EXPR:
> case NE_EXPR:
> @@ -7703,6 +8128,7 @@ process_bb (rpo_elim &avail, basic_block bb,
> }
> }
> }
> + bool changed = false;
> for (gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_start_bb (bb);
> !gsi_end_p (gsi); gsi_next (&gsi))
> {
> @@ -7725,31 +8151,38 @@ process_bb (rpo_elim &avail, basic_block bb,
> the visited flag in SSA_VAL. */
> }
>
> - visit_stmt (gsi_stmt (gsi));
> + changed |= visit_stmt (gsi_stmt (gsi));
>
> gimple *last = gsi_stmt (gsi);
> e = NULL;
> switch (gimple_code (last))
> {
> case GIMPLE_SWITCH:
> + /* TODO: utilize temporary equivalences. */
> e = find_taken_edge (bb, vn_valueize (gimple_switch_index
> (as_a <gswitch *> (last))));
> break;
> case GIMPLE_COND:
> {
> - tree lhs = vn_valueize (gimple_cond_lhs (last));
> - tree rhs = vn_valueize (gimple_cond_rhs (last));
> - tree val = gimple_simplify (gimple_cond_code (last),
> - boolean_type_node, lhs, rhs,
> - NULL, vn_valueize);
> + tree lhs = lookup_equiv_head (gimple_cond_lhs (last), bb);
> + tree rhs = lookup_equiv_head (gimple_cond_rhs (last), bb);
> + tree ops[2];
> + ops[0] = lhs;
> + ops[1] = rhs;
> + tree val = fold_const_from_equiv_heads (2, gimple_cond_code (last),
> + ops, boolean_type_node);
> + if (val && (dump_flags & TDF_DETAILS))
> + {
> + fprintf (dump_file, "Got simplified result ");
> + print_generic_expr (dump_file, val, TDF_NONE);
> + fprintf (dump_file, " for ");
> + print_gimple_stmt (dump_file, last, TDF_SLIM);
> + }
> + vn_nary_op_t vnresult = NULL;
> /* If the condition didn't simplfy see if we have recorded
> an expression from sofar taken edges. */
> if (! val || TREE_CODE (val) != INTEGER_CST)
> {
> - vn_nary_op_t vnresult;
> - tree ops[2];
> - ops[0] = lhs;
> - ops[1] = rhs;
> val = vn_nary_op_lookup_pieces (2, gimple_cond_code (last),
> boolean_type_node, ops,
> &vnresult);
> @@ -7780,15 +8213,17 @@ process_bb (rpo_elim &avail, basic_block bb,
> enum tree_code code = gimple_cond_code (last);
> enum tree_code icode
> = invert_tree_comparison (code, HONOR_NANS (lhs));
> - tree ops[2];
> - ops[0] = lhs;
> - ops[1] = rhs;
> if (do_region
> && bitmap_bit_p (exit_bbs, true_e->dest->index))
> true_e = NULL;
> if (do_region
> && bitmap_bit_p (exit_bbs, false_e->dest->index))
> false_e = NULL;
> + if (changed && (true_e || false_e))
> + {
> + ops[0] = lookup_equiv_head (lhs, bb);
> + ops[1] = lookup_equiv_head (rhs, bb);
> + }
> if (true_e)
> vn_nary_op_insert_pieces_predicated
> (2, code, boolean_type_node, ops,
> @@ -7817,6 +8252,15 @@ process_bb (rpo_elim &avail, basic_block bb,
> if (false_e)
> insert_related_predicates_on_edge (icode, ops, false_e);
> }
> +
> + /* Try to record equivalences generated by previous PHI nodes
> + on current true & false edges. */
> + if (true_e)
> + record_equiv_from_prev_phi (vnresult, true_e, bb, code, ops,
> + boolean_true_node);
> + if (false_e)
> + record_equiv_from_prev_phi (vnresult, false_e, bb, code, ops,
> + boolean_false_node);
> }
> break;
> }
> @@ -7939,6 +8383,7 @@ struct unwind_state
> vn_phi_t phi_top;
> vn_nary_op_t nary_top;
> vn_avail *avail_top;
> + nary_ref *nary_ref_top;
> };
>
> /* Unwind the RPO VN state for iteration. */
> @@ -7988,6 +8433,17 @@ do_unwind (unwind_state *to, rpo_elim &avail)
> av->next = avail.m_avail_freelist;
> avail.m_avail_freelist = av;
> }
> + /* Drain nary_refs to freelist, to reuse the memory. */
> + for (; last_pushed_nary_ref && last_pushed_nary_ref->ref != to->nary_ref_top;)
> + {
> + vn_ssa_aux_t val = last_pushed_nary_ref;
> + nary_ref *ref = val->ref;
> + val->ref = ref->next;
> + last_pushed_nary_ref = ref->next_undo;
> + ref->next = nary_ref_freelist;
> + nary_ref_freelist = ref;
> + --val->num_nary_ref;
> + }
> }
>
> /* Do VN on a SEME region specified by ENTRY and EXIT_BBS in FN.
> @@ -8102,6 +8558,8 @@ do_rpo_vn_1 (function *fn, edge entry, bitmap exit_bbs,
> last_inserted_phi = NULL;
> last_inserted_nary = NULL;
> last_pushed_avail = NULL;
> + last_pushed_nary_ref = NULL;
> + nary_ref_freelist = NULL;
>
> vn_valueize = rpo_vn_valueize;
>
> @@ -8196,6 +8654,8 @@ do_rpo_vn_1 (function *fn, edge entry, bitmap exit_bbs,
> rpo_state[idx].nary_top = last_inserted_nary;
> rpo_state[idx].avail_top
> = last_pushed_avail ? last_pushed_avail->avail : NULL;
> + rpo_state[idx].nary_ref_top
> + = last_pushed_nary_ref ? last_pushed_nary_ref->ref : NULL;
> }
>
> if (!(bb->flags & BB_EXECUTABLE))
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.h b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.h
> index abcf7e666c2..bba7a607dfb 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.h
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.h
> @@ -217,6 +217,16 @@ struct vn_avail
> struct vn_ssa_aux *next_undo;
> };
>
> +/* In vn_ssa_aux structure, hold a lists of references to the nary map entries,
> + so that when recording new equivalence to the value number, we can re-insert
> + expressions' results based on this. */
> +struct nary_ref
> +{
> + nary_ref *next;
> + vn_nary_op_t slot;
> + struct vn_ssa_aux *next_undo;
> +};
> +
> typedef struct vn_ssa_aux
> {
> /* SSA name this vn_ssa_aux is associated with in the lattice. */
> @@ -230,9 +240,15 @@ typedef struct vn_ssa_aux
> for SSA names also serving as values (NAME == VALNUM). */
> vn_avail *avail;
>
> + /* References to slots in the nary map, with VALNUM as operand. */
> + nary_ref *ref;
> +
> /* Unique identifier that all expressions with the same value have. */
> unsigned int value_id;
>
> + /* nary_ref count. */
> + unsigned short num_nary_ref;
> +
> /* Whether the SSA_NAME has been processed at least once. */
> unsigned visited : 1;
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-09-22 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-09-07 7:30 PING^2: [PATCH v5] tree-optimization/101186 - extend FRE with "equivalence map" for condition prediction Di Zhao OS
2022-09-22 12:34 ` Richard Biener
2022-09-22 12:36 ` Richard Biener
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).