From: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: Implement C++26 P2809R3 - Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 09:35:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFiYyc3ypTo1OfH0ycLGVezgYgw-=NtXc25KVD9dxxNVBC7z+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zg0ETiZcDZQaDd3+@tucnak>
On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:25 AM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The following patch attempts to implement P2809R3, which has been voted
> in as a DR.
>
> The middle-end has its behavior documented:
> '-ffinite-loops'
> Assume that a loop with an exit will eventually take the exit and
> not loop indefinitely. This allows the compiler to remove loops
> that otherwise have no side-effects, not considering eventual
> endless looping as such.
>
> This option is enabled by default at '-O2' for C++ with -std=c++11
> or higher.
>
> So, the following patch attempts to detect trivial infinite loops and
> turn their conditions into INTEGER_CSTs so that they don't really have
> exits in the middle-end and so regardless of -ffinite-loops or
> -fno-finite-loops they are handled as infinite loops by the middle-end.
> Otherwise, if the condition would be a large expression calling various
> constexpr functions, I'd be afraid we could e.g. just inline some of them
> and not all of them and the middle-end could still see tests in the
> condition and with -ffinite-loops optimize it by assuming that such loops
> need to be finite.
>
> The "A trivial infinite loop is a trivially empty iteration statement for
> which the converted controlling expression is a constant expression, when
> interpreted as a constant-expression ([expr.const]), and evaluates to true."
> wording isn't clear to me what it implies for manifest constant evaluation
> of the expression, especially given the
> int x = 42;
> while (std::is_constant_evaluated() || --x) ;
> example in the rationale.
>
> The patch assumes that the condition expression aren't manifestly constant
> evaluated. If it would be supposed to be manifestly constant evaluated,
> then I think the DR would significantly change behavior of existing programs
> and have really weird effects. Before the DR has been voted in, I think
> void foo (int x)
> {
> if (x == 0)
> while (std::is_constant_evaluated())
> ;
> else
> while (!std::is_constant_evaluated())
> ;
> }
> would have well defined behavior of zero loop body iterations if x == 0 and
> undefined behavior otherwise. If the condition expression is manifestly
> constant evaluated if it evaluates to true, and otherwise can be
> non-constant or not manifestly constant evaluated otherwise, then the
> behavior would be that for x == 0 it is well defined trvial infinite loop,
> while for x != 0 it would keep to be undefined behavior (infinite loop,
> as !std::is_constant_evaluated() is false when manifestly constant evaluated
> and if we keep the condition as is, evaluates then to true. I think it
> would be fairly strange if both loops are infinite even when their condition
> are negated. Similar for anything that is dependent on if consteval or
> std::is_constant_evaluated() inside of it.
>
> So, the patch below attempts to discover trivially empty iteration
> statements at cp_fold time if it is the final mce_false folding,
> attempts to maybe_constant_value with mce_false evaluate the conditions
> and replaces it with the returned value if constant non-zero.
>
> The testcases then try to check if the FE changed the calls in the
> conditions into constants.
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
I'll note that -ffinite-loops is reflected into the IL (the loop structure) at
CFG build time in the following simple way:
/* Push the global flag_finite_loops state down to individual loops. */
loop->finite_p = flag_finite_loops;
and the "has an exit" is checked when we evalutate a loop->finite_p loop.
The above flag evaluation could be made a langhook as it's suitably
early, but I'm not sure whether that would help. The flag is evaluated
when we evaluate the loop ANNOTATE_EXPRs, so annotating finite
loops with a new annotate might be possible as well.
Just in case making the control expression constant to the middle-end
doesn't scale.
Richard.
> Or is it really supposed to be mce_true with the above described weird
> behavior? If so, I think the standard at least should mention it in Annex C
> (though, where when it is a DR?).
>
> 2024-04-02 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/114462
> * cp-gimplify.cc (cp_fold): Implement C++26 P2809R3 - Trivial infinite
> loops are not Undefined Behavior. For trivially empty WHILE_STMT,
> DO_STMT or FOR_STMT iteration statements check if the condition is
> constant expression which evaluates to true and in that case replace
> the condition with true.
>
> * g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop1.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop2.C: New test.
> * g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop3.C: New test.
>
> --- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc.jj 2024-03-23 11:17:06.958445857 +0100
> +++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc 2024-04-02 11:27:56.069170914 +0200
> @@ -3527,6 +3527,78 @@ cp_fold (tree x, fold_flags_t flags)
> x = evaluate_requires_expr (x);
> break;
>
> + case WHILE_STMT:
> + /* For trivially empty iteration statements check if the condition
> + is constant expression which evaluates to true and in that case
> + change the condition to the constant, so that the middle-end treats
> + it as an infinite loop regardless of -ffinite-loops. */
> + if ((flags & ff_mce_false) && !integer_nonzerop (WHILE_COND (x)))
> + {
> + tree body = WHILE_BODY (x);
> + if (expr_first (body) == NULL_TREE)
> + {
> + r = maybe_constant_value (WHILE_COND (x), /*decl=*/NULL_TREE,
> + mce_false);
> + if (integer_nonzerop (r))
> + {
> + x = copy_node (x);
> + WHILE_COND (x) = r;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + return org_x;
> +
> + case DO_STMT:
> + /* For trivially empty iteration statements check if the condition
> + is constant expression which evaluates to true and in that case
> + change the condition to the constant, so that the middle-end treats
> + it as an infinite loop regardless of -ffinite-loops. */
> + if ((flags & ff_mce_false) && !integer_nonzerop (DO_COND (x)))
> + {
> + tree body = DO_BODY (x);
> + if (expr_first (body) == NULL_TREE
> + || (CONVERT_EXPR_P (body)
> + && integer_zerop (TREE_OPERAND (body, 0))
> + && VOID_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (body))))
> + {
> + r = maybe_constant_value (DO_COND (x), /*decl=*/NULL_TREE,
> + mce_false);
> + if (integer_nonzerop (r))
> + {
> + x = copy_node (x);
> + DO_COND (x) = r;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + return org_x;
> +
> + case FOR_STMT:
> + /* For trivially empty iteration statements check if the condition
> + is constant expression which evaluates to true and in that case
> + change the condition to the constant, so that the middle-end treats
> + it as an infinite loop regardless of -ffinite-loops. */
> + if ((flags & ff_mce_false)
> + && FOR_COND (x)
> + && FOR_EXPR (x) == NULL_TREE
> + && !integer_nonzerop (FOR_COND (x)))
> + {
> + tree body = FOR_BODY (x);
> + if (expr_first (body) == NULL_TREE)
> + {
> + r = maybe_constant_value (FOR_COND (x), /*decl=*/NULL_TREE,
> + mce_false);
> + if (integer_nonzerop (r))
> + {
> + x = copy_node (x);
> + FOR_COND (x) = r;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + return org_x;
> +
> default:
> return org_x;
> }
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop1.C.jj 2024-04-02 11:50:00.943874185 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop1.C 2024-04-02 12:19:52.132211449 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> +// P2809R3 - Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +// { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-gimple -fno-inline" }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = foo \\\(\\\)" "gimple" } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = S::operator bool \\\(" "gimple" } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = baz \\\(\\\)" "gimple" } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not " = std::is_constant_evaluated \\\(\\\)" "gimple" } }
> +
> +volatile int v;
> +
> +constexpr bool
> +foo ()
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +{
> + constexpr S () : s (true) {}
> + constexpr operator bool () const { return s; }
> + bool s;
> +};
> +
> +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
> +namespace std {
> + constexpr inline bool
> + is_constant_evaluated () noexcept
> + {
> +#if __cpp_if_consteval >= 202106L
> + if consteval { return true; } else { return false; }
> +#else
> + return __builtin_is_constant_evaluated ();
> +#endif
> + }
> +}
> +
> +constexpr bool
> +baz ()
> +{
> + return !std::is_constant_evaluated ();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void
> +bar (int x)
> +{
> + switch (x)
> + {
> + case 0:
> + while (foo ()) ;
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + while (foo ()) {}
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + do ; while (foo ());
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + do {} while (foo ());
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + for (v = 42; foo (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 5:
> + for (v = 42; foo (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 6:
> + for (int w = 42; foo (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 7:
> + for (int w = 42; foo (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 10:
> + while (S {}) ;
> + break;
> + case 11:
> + while (S {}) {}
> + break;
> + case 12:
> + do ; while (S {});
> + break;
> + case 13:
> + do {} while (S {});
> + break;
> + case 14:
> + for (v = 42; S {}; ) ;
> + break;
> + case 15:
> + for (v = 42; S {}; ) {}
> + break;
> + case 16:
> + for (int w = 42; S {}; ) ;
> + break;
> + case 17:
> + for (int w = 42; S {}; ) {}
> + break;
> +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
> + case 20:
> + while (baz ()) ;
> + break;
> + case 21:
> + while (baz ()) {}
> + break;
> + case 22:
> + do ; while (baz ());
> + break;
> + case 23:
> + do {} while (baz ());
> + break;
> + case 24:
> + for (v = 42; baz (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 25:
> + for (v = 42; baz (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 26:
> + for (int w = 42; baz (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 27:
> + for (int w = 42; baz (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 30:
> + while (!std::is_constant_evaluated ()) ;
> + break;
> + case 31:
> + while (!std::is_constant_evaluated ()) {}
> + break;
> + case 32:
> + do ; while (!std::is_constant_evaluated ());
> + break;
> + case 33:
> + do {} while (!std::is_constant_evaluated ());
> + break;
> + case 34:
> + for (v = 42; !std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 35:
> + for (v = 42; !std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 36:
> + for (int w = 42; !std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 37:
> + for (int w = 42; !std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) {}
> + break;
> +#endif
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop2.C.jj 2024-04-02 12:06:31.494215751 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop2.C 2024-04-02 12:20:32.037663398 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,150 @@
> +// P2809R3 - Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +// { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-gimple -fno-inline" }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = foo \\\(\\\)" 8 "gimple" } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = S::operator bool \\\(" 8 "gimple" } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = baz \\\(\\\)" 8 "gimple" { target c++20 } } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = std::is_constant_evaluated \\\(\\\)" 9 "gimple" { target c++20 } } }
> +
> +volatile int v;
> +
> +constexpr bool
> +foo ()
> +{
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +{
> + constexpr S () : s (false) {}
> + constexpr operator bool () const { return s; }
> + bool s;
> +};
> +
> +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
> +namespace std {
> + constexpr inline bool
> + is_constant_evaluated () noexcept
> + {
> +#if __cpp_if_consteval >= 202106L
> + if consteval { return true; } else { return false; }
> +#else
> + return __builtin_is_constant_evaluated ();
> +#endif
> + }
> +}
> +
> +constexpr bool
> +baz ()
> +{
> + return std::is_constant_evaluated ();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void
> +bar (int x)
> +{
> + switch (x)
> + {
> + case 0:
> + while (foo ()) ;
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + while (foo ()) {}
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + do ; while (foo ());
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + do {} while (foo ());
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + for (v = 42; foo (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 5:
> + for (v = 42; foo (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 6:
> + for (int w = 42; foo (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 7:
> + for (int w = 42; foo (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 10:
> + while (S {}) ;
> + break;
> + case 11:
> + while (S {}) {}
> + break;
> + case 12:
> + do ; while (S {});
> + break;
> + case 13:
> + do {} while (S {});
> + break;
> + case 14:
> + for (v = 42; S {}; ) ;
> + break;
> + case 15:
> + for (v = 42; S {}; ) {}
> + break;
> + case 16:
> + for (int w = 42; S {}; ) ;
> + break;
> + case 17:
> + for (int w = 42; S {}; ) {}
> + break;
> +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
> + case 20:
> + while (baz ()) ;
> + break;
> + case 21:
> + while (baz ()) {}
> + break;
> + case 22:
> + do ; while (baz ());
> + break;
> + case 23:
> + do {} while (baz ());
> + break;
> + case 24:
> + for (v = 42; baz (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 25:
> + for (v = 42; baz (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 26:
> + for (int w = 42; baz (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 27:
> + for (int w = 42; baz (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 30:
> + while (std::is_constant_evaluated ()) ;
> + break;
> + case 31:
> + while (std::is_constant_evaluated ()) {}
> + break;
> + case 32:
> + do ; while (std::is_constant_evaluated ());
> + break;
> + case 33:
> + do {} while (std::is_constant_evaluated ());
> + break;
> + case 34:
> + for (v = 42; std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 35:
> + for (v = 42; std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) {}
> + break;
> + case 36:
> + for (int w = 42; std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) ;
> + break;
> + case 37:
> + for (int w = 42; std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) {}
> + break;
> +#endif
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop3.C.jj 2024-04-02 12:14:23.993717999 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp26/trivial-infinite-loop3.C 2024-04-02 12:21:10.341137353 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +// P2809R3 - Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +// { dg-additional-options "-fdump-tree-gimple -fno-inline" }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = foo \\\(\\\)" 8 "gimple" } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = S::operator bool \\\(" 8 "gimple" } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = baz \\\(\\\)" 8 "gimple" { target c++20 } } }
> +// { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = std::is_constant_evaluated \\\(\\\)" 9 "gimple" { target c++20 } } }
> +
> +volatile int v;
> +int y;
> +
> +constexpr bool
> +foo ()
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +struct S
> +{
> + constexpr S () : s (true) {}
> + constexpr operator bool () const { return s; }
> + bool s;
> +};
> +
> +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
> +namespace std {
> + constexpr inline bool
> + is_constant_evaluated () noexcept
> + {
> +#if __cpp_if_consteval >= 202106L
> + if consteval { return true; } else { return false; }
> +#else
> + return __builtin_is_constant_evaluated ();
> +#endif
> + }
> +}
> +
> +constexpr bool
> +baz ()
> +{
> + return !std::is_constant_evaluated ();
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +void
> +bar (int x)
> +{
> + switch (x)
> + {
> + case 0:
> + while (foo ()) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 1:
> + while (foo ()) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 2:
> + do ++y; while (foo ());
> + break;
> + case 3:
> + do { ++y; } while (foo ());
> + break;
> + case 4:
> + for (v = 42; foo (); ) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 5:
> + for (v = 42; foo (); ) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 6:
> + for (int w = 42; foo (); ) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 7:
> + for (int w = 42; foo (); ) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 10:
> + while (S {}) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 11:
> + while (S {}) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 12:
> + do ++y; while (S {});
> + break;
> + case 13:
> + do { ++y; } while (S {});
> + break;
> + case 14:
> + for (v = 42; S {}; ) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 15:
> + for (v = 42; S {}; ) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 16:
> + for (int w = 42; S {}; ) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 17:
> + for (int w = 42; S {}; ) { ++y; }
> + break;
> +#if __cplusplus >= 202002L
> + case 20:
> + while (baz ()) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 21:
> + while (baz ()) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 22:
> + do ++y; while (baz ());
> + break;
> + case 23:
> + do { ++y; } while (baz ());
> + break;
> + case 24:
> + for (v = 42; baz (); ) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 25:
> + for (v = 42; baz (); ) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 26:
> + for (int w = 42; baz (); ) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 27:
> + for (int w = 42; baz (); ) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 30:
> + while (!std::is_constant_evaluated ()) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 31:
> + while (!std::is_constant_evaluated ()) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 32:
> + do ++y; while (!std::is_constant_evaluated ());
> + break;
> + case 33:
> + do { ++y; } while (!std::is_constant_evaluated ());
> + break;
> + case 34:
> + for (v = 42; !std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 35:
> + for (v = 42; !std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) { ++y; }
> + break;
> + case 36:
> + for (int w = 42; !std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) ++y;
> + break;
> + case 37:
> + for (int w = 42; !std::is_constant_evaluated (); ) { ++y; }
> + break;
> +#endif
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-03 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-03 7:25 Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-03 7:35 ` Richard Biener [this message]
2024-04-03 7:46 ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-03 16:07 ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-03 16:42 ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-03 16:58 ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-03 19:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-03 20:48 ` Jason Merrill
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFiYyc3ypTo1OfH0ycLGVezgYgw-=NtXc25KVD9dxxNVBC7z+g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jason@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).