public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++: Implement C++26 P2809R3 - Trivial infinite loops are not Undefined Behavior
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 21:16:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zg2rIFMOTIGy9rL0@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eade32a2-19bf-408b-920f-9ba0b9c20450@redhat.com>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:58:12PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 4/3/24 12:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 03, 2024 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > Using std::is_constant_evaluated directly in a loop condition is, as the
> > > paper says, unlikely and "horrendous code", so I'm not concerned about
> > > surprising effects, though I guess we should check for it with
> > > maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated.
> > 
> > Ok, though guess the question is what to say about it.
> > Because unlike the existing cases in maybe_warn_for_constant_evaluated
> > where it always evaluates to true or always to false depending on where,
> > in the trivial empty iteration statements it evaluates to always true or
> > always false depending or sometimes true, sometimes false, depending on
> > if the condition is a constant expression that evaluates to true (then it is
> > always true), or if in immediate function (also always true), or if not
> > in constexpr function (then always false), or in constexpr function (then
> > it might be true or false).
> > Not sure how exactly to word that.
> > Maybe just say that it is horrendous code to use std::is_constant_evaluated
> > () in trivial empty iteration statement conditions ;)
> 
> Maybe if the condition constant-evaluates to true, warn something like
> "%<std::is_constant_evaluated%> always constant-evaluates to true in the
> condition of a trivially empty iteration statement"?

Given the mails on core about this, isn't it actually the case that not all
"trivial infinite loops" actually loop at all or if they loop, don't loop
infinitely?
I.e. what I wrote in the patch would be wrong and that generally we need to
use ANNOTATE_EXPR in some cases?
As in, for trivially empty iteration statements try to evaluate the
maybe_const_value evaluate condition with mce_true, if it yields true,
try to maybe_const_value evaluate condition with mce_false, if it also
yields true, replace it with true, but if the former returns true and
the latter isn't a constant expression or returns false mark the loop with
ANNOTATE_EXPR as infinite loop regardless of -ffinite-loops and actually
keep invoking the condition in there?

	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-03 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-03  7:25 Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-03  7:35 ` Richard Biener
2024-04-03  7:46   ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-03 16:07 ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-03 16:42   ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-03 16:58     ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-03 19:16       ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2024-04-03 20:48         ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zg2rIFMOTIGy9rL0@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).