public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Neumann <neumann@in.tum.de>
Cc: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Avoid depending on destructor order
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2022 10:01:09 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGWvnykdvtdwN+jg5kbzB54bhK6namLhZyvwhMBDD+uha8mdTA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88e489d8-4248-75de-6e8e-af6f152da61b@in.tum.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1504 bytes --]

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 9:38 AM Thomas Neumann <neumann@in.tum.de> wrote:

> > This patch broke bootstrap on AIX and probably other targets.
> >
> > #ifdef ATOMIC_FDE_FAST_PATH
> > #include "unwind-dw2-btree.h"
> >
> > static struct btree registered_frames;
> > static bool in_shutdown;
> > ...
> > #else
> >
> > in_shutdown only is defined for ATOMIC_FDE_FAST_PATH but used in code /
> > asserts not protected by that macro.
> >
> >    gcc_assert (in_shutdown || ob);
> >    return (void *) ob;
> > }
>
> I am sorry for that, I did not consider that my test machines all use
> the fast path.
>
> I think the problem can be fixed by the trivial patch below, I will
> commit that after I have tested builds both with and without fast path.
>
> Best
>
> Thomas
>
>
> diff --git a/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c b/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c
> index d237179f4ea..d6e347c5481 100644
> --- a/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c
> +++ b/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde.c
> @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ static void
>   init_object (struct object *ob);
>
>   #else
> +/* Without fast path frame lookup must always succeed */
>
The comment should end with full stop and two spaces.


> +static const bool in_shutdown = false;
>
I'll let Jason or others decide if this is the right solution.  It seems
that in_shutdown also could be declared outside the #ifdef and initialized
as "false".

Thanks, David


>
>   /* The unseen_objects list contains objects that have been registered
>      but not yet categorized in any way.  The seen_objects list has had
>

  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-23 14:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-23 13:25 David Edelsohn
2022-09-23 13:38 ` Thomas Neumann
2022-09-23 14:01   ` David Edelsohn [this message]
2022-09-23 14:12     ` Thomas Neumann
2022-09-23 14:30       ` David Edelsohn
2022-09-25  6:29         ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-25 15:29           ` Jeff Law
2022-09-26  7:55             ` Rainer Orth
2022-09-27  0:17       ` Jason Merrill
2022-09-23 14:11   ` David Edelsohn
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-09-19 16:20 Thomas Neumann
2022-09-22 22:22 ` Jason Merrill
2022-09-26 11:46 ` Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu
2022-09-26 11:49   ` Thomas Neumann
2022-09-26 11:50     ` Claudiu Zissulescu Ianculescu
2022-09-26 12:53     ` Iain Sandoe
2022-09-26 13:14       ` Thomas Neumann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGWvnykdvtdwN+jg5kbzB54bhK6namLhZyvwhMBDD+uha8mdTA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=neumann@in.tum.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).