From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
"Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
GCC patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [range-ops] Implement sqrt.
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:01:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGm3qMUfWpg_=8piPQ9hRqiiErKOgQBhZbyxVJ+Ti5ATHc8Z6A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y3JSRtAgs+MUMk3H@tucnak>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1009 bytes --]
Huh...no argument from me.
Thanks.
Aldy
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 15:35 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 07:30:18AM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > To Jakub's concern. I thought sqrt was treated like +-/* WRT accuracy
> > requirements by IEEE. ie, for any input there is a well defined answer
> for
> > a confirming IEEE implementation. In fact, getting to that .5ulp bound
> is
> > a significant amount of the cost for a NR or Goldschmidt (or hybrid)
> > implementation if you've got a reasonable (say 12 or 14 bit) estimator
> and
> > high performance fmacs.
>
> That might be the case (except for the known libquadmath sqrtq case
> PR105101 which fortunately is not a builtin).
> But we'll need to ulps infrastructure for other functions anyway and
> it would be nice to write a short testcase first that will test
> sqrt{,f,l,f32,f64,f128} and can be easily adjusted to test other functions.
> I'll try to cook something up tomorrow.
>
> Jakub
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-13 20:05 Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-13 20:39 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-14 7:45 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-14 14:30 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-14 14:35 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-14 14:48 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-14 15:01 ` Aldy Hernandez [this message]
2022-11-14 21:55 ` Joseph Myers
2022-11-16 20:32 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-17 16:40 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-17 16:48 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-17 17:42 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-17 18:59 ` Joseph Myers
2022-11-17 19:37 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-17 20:43 ` Joseph Myers
2022-11-18 8:39 ` Richard Biener
2022-11-18 10:37 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-18 10:44 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-18 11:20 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-18 11:57 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-18 12:14 ` Richard Biener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGm3qMUfWpg_=8piPQ9hRqiiErKOgQBhZbyxVJ+Ti5ATHc8Z6A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).