public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] x86: avoid maybe_gen_...()
@ 2023-07-14  9:42 Jan Beulich
  2023-07-17  6:12 ` Hongtao Liu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2023-07-14  9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Hongtao Liu, Kirill Yukhin

In the (however unlikely) event that no insn can be found for the
requested mode, using maybe_gen_...() without (really) checking its
result for being a null rtx would lead to silent bad code generation.

gcc/

	* config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate):
	Use gen_vec_set_0.
	(ix86_expand_vector_extract): Use gen_vec_extract_lo /
	gen_vec_extract_hi.
	(expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1): Use gen_vec_interleave_high /
	gen_vec_interleave_low. Rename local variable.

--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
@@ -15456,8 +15456,7 @@ ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate (bool
 	    {
 	      tmp1 = force_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), val);
 	      tmp2 = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
-	      emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_set_0 (mode, tmp2,
-					      CONST0_RTX (mode), tmp1));
+	      emit_insn (gen_vec_set_0 (mode, tmp2, CONST0_RTX (mode), tmp1));
 	      tmp1 = gen_lowpart (mode, tmp2);
 	    }
 	  else
@@ -17419,9 +17418,9 @@ ix86_expand_vector_extract (bool mmx_ok,
 		 ? gen_reg_rtx (V16HFmode)
 		 : gen_reg_rtx (V16BFmode));
 	  if (elt < 16)
-	    emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_extract_lo (mode, tmp, vec));
+	    emit_insn (gen_vec_extract_lo (mode, tmp, vec));
 	  else
-	    emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_extract_hi (mode, tmp, vec));
+	    emit_insn (gen_vec_extract_hi (mode, tmp, vec));
 	  ix86_expand_vector_extract (false, target, tmp, elt & 15);
 	  return;
 	}
@@ -17435,9 +17434,9 @@ ix86_expand_vector_extract (bool mmx_ok,
 		 ? gen_reg_rtx (V8HFmode)
 		 : gen_reg_rtx (V8BFmode));
 	  if (elt < 8)
-	    emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_extract_lo (mode, tmp, vec));
+	    emit_insn (gen_vec_extract_lo (mode, tmp, vec));
 	  else
-	    emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_extract_hi (mode, tmp, vec));
+	    emit_insn (gen_vec_extract_hi (mode, tmp, vec));
 	  ix86_expand_vector_extract (false, target, tmp, elt & 7);
 	  return;
 	}
@@ -22501,18 +22500,18 @@ expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1 (struct expa
       if (d->testing_p)
 	return true;
 
-      rtx (*maybe_gen) (machine_mode, int, rtx, rtx, rtx);
+      rtx (*gen_interleave) (machine_mode, int, rtx, rtx, rtx);
       if (elt >= nelt2)
 	{
-	  maybe_gen = maybe_gen_vec_interleave_high;
+	  gen_interleave = gen_vec_interleave_high;
 	  elt -= nelt2;
 	}
       else
-	maybe_gen = maybe_gen_vec_interleave_low;
+	gen_interleave = gen_vec_interleave_low;
       nelt2 /= 2;
 
       dest = gen_reg_rtx (vmode);
-      emit_insn (maybe_gen (vmode, 1, dest, op0, op0));
+      emit_insn (gen_interleave (vmode, 1, dest, op0, op0));
 
       vmode = V4SImode;
       op0 = gen_lowpart (vmode, dest);

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] x86: avoid maybe_gen_...()
  2023-07-14  9:42 [PATCH] x86: avoid maybe_gen_...() Jan Beulich
@ 2023-07-17  6:12 ` Hongtao Liu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hongtao Liu @ 2023-07-17  6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: gcc-patches, Hongtao Liu, Kirill Yukhin

On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 5:42 PM Jan Beulich via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> In the (however unlikely) event that no insn can be found for the
> requested mode, using maybe_gen_...() without (really) checking its
> result for being a null rtx would lead to silent bad code generation.
Ok.
>
> gcc/
>
>         * config/i386/i386-expand.cc (ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate):
>         Use gen_vec_set_0.
>         (ix86_expand_vector_extract): Use gen_vec_extract_lo /
>         gen_vec_extract_hi.
>         (expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1): Use gen_vec_interleave_high /
>         gen_vec_interleave_low. Rename local variable.
>
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc
> @@ -15456,8 +15456,7 @@ ix86_expand_vector_init_duplicate (bool
>             {
>               tmp1 = force_reg (GET_MODE_INNER (mode), val);
>               tmp2 = gen_reg_rtx (mode);
> -             emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_set_0 (mode, tmp2,
> -                                             CONST0_RTX (mode), tmp1));
> +             emit_insn (gen_vec_set_0 (mode, tmp2, CONST0_RTX (mode), tmp1));
>               tmp1 = gen_lowpart (mode, tmp2);
>             }
>           else
> @@ -17419,9 +17418,9 @@ ix86_expand_vector_extract (bool mmx_ok,
>                  ? gen_reg_rtx (V16HFmode)
>                  : gen_reg_rtx (V16BFmode));
>           if (elt < 16)
> -           emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_extract_lo (mode, tmp, vec));
> +           emit_insn (gen_vec_extract_lo (mode, tmp, vec));
>           else
> -           emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_extract_hi (mode, tmp, vec));
> +           emit_insn (gen_vec_extract_hi (mode, tmp, vec));
>           ix86_expand_vector_extract (false, target, tmp, elt & 15);
>           return;
>         }
> @@ -17435,9 +17434,9 @@ ix86_expand_vector_extract (bool mmx_ok,
>                  ? gen_reg_rtx (V8HFmode)
>                  : gen_reg_rtx (V8BFmode));
>           if (elt < 8)
> -           emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_extract_lo (mode, tmp, vec));
> +           emit_insn (gen_vec_extract_lo (mode, tmp, vec));
>           else
> -           emit_insn (maybe_gen_vec_extract_hi (mode, tmp, vec));
> +           emit_insn (gen_vec_extract_hi (mode, tmp, vec));
>           ix86_expand_vector_extract (false, target, tmp, elt & 7);
>           return;
>         }
> @@ -22501,18 +22500,18 @@ expand_vec_perm_broadcast_1 (struct expa
>        if (d->testing_p)
>         return true;
>
> -      rtx (*maybe_gen) (machine_mode, int, rtx, rtx, rtx);
> +      rtx (*gen_interleave) (machine_mode, int, rtx, rtx, rtx);
>        if (elt >= nelt2)
>         {
> -         maybe_gen = maybe_gen_vec_interleave_high;
> +         gen_interleave = gen_vec_interleave_high;
>           elt -= nelt2;
>         }
>        else
> -       maybe_gen = maybe_gen_vec_interleave_low;
> +       gen_interleave = gen_vec_interleave_low;
>        nelt2 /= 2;
>
>        dest = gen_reg_rtx (vmode);
> -      emit_insn (maybe_gen (vmode, 1, dest, op0, op0));
> +      emit_insn (gen_interleave (vmode, 1, dest, op0, op0));
>
>        vmode = V4SImode;
>        op0 = gen_lowpart (vmode, dest);



-- 
BR,
Hongtao

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-07-17  6:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-14  9:42 [PATCH] x86: avoid maybe_gen_...() Jan Beulich
2023-07-17  6:12 ` Hongtao Liu

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).