public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: Hongtao Liu <hongtao.liu@intel.com>,
	Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
	 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>,
	Tobias Burnus <tobias@codesourcery.com>,
	 GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code.
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:00:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpC=aUUbMHqEYMAsqDwggQB_OTrc+TONfGbbOd5MUTN3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9e53e7e4-3268-7970-c4e7-dacb808e05e2@suse.cz>

On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:44 AM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On 11/12/21 15:41, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:27 AM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 11/8/21 15:19, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 11/8/2021 2:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:45:39AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
> >>>>> This fixes issue reported in the PR.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Ready to be installed?
> >>>> I'm not sure.  liboffloadmic is copied from upstream, so the right
> >>>> thing if we want to do anything at all (if we don't remove it, nothing
> >>>> bad happens, the condition is never true anyway, whether removed away
> >>>> in the source or removed by the compiler) would be to let Intel fix it in
> >>>> their source and update from that.
> >>>> But I have no idea where it even lives upstream.
> >>> I thought MIC as an architecture was dead, so it could well be the case that there isn't a viable upstream anymore for that code.
> >>>
> >>> jeff
> >>
> >> @H.J. ?
> >>
> >
> > We'd like to deprecate MIC offload in GCC 12.  We will remove all traces of
> > MIC offload in GCC 13.
>
> I see. So do you want the patch to be installed or not?
>

I prefer to leave it alone and close the PR with WONTFIX.

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-12 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-08  8:45 Martin Liška
2021-11-08  8:59 ` Jakub Jelinek
2021-11-08 14:19   ` Jeff Law
2021-11-12 14:27     ` Martin Liška
2021-11-12 14:41       ` H.J. Lu
2021-11-12 14:44         ` Martin Liška
2021-11-12 15:00           ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-11-12 19:14         ` Richard Biener
2021-11-12 19:18           ` H.J. Lu
2021-11-12 19:52             ` Richard Biener
2022-10-20 11:15         ` Remove support for Intel MIC offloading (was: [PATCH] Remove dead code.) Thomas Schwinge
2022-10-20 11:34           ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-04 10:05             ` GCC 13: OpenMP offloading to Intel MIC has been removed (was: Remove support for Intel MIC offloading) Thomas Schwinge
2022-11-04 10:36               ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-20 12:33           ` Remove support for Intel MIC offloading (was: [PATCH] Remove dead code.) Michael Matz
2022-10-20 12:40             ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-20 13:09               ` Richard Biener
2023-02-01 15:12                 ` Martin Jambor
2023-02-02 21:13                   ` GSoC project idea: Separate Host Process Offloading (was: Remove support for Intel MIC offloading) Thomas Schwinge
2023-02-07 23:26                     ` GSoC project idea: Separate Host Process Offloading Thomas Schwinge
2023-02-08  7:47                       ` Tobias Burnus
2022-10-20 20:56           ` Remove support for Intel MIC offloading Thomas Schwinge
2022-11-04  9:54             ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-11-04 10:30               ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-11-04 10:35                 ` Thomas Schwinge
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-06-09 16:24 [PATCH] Remove dead code Richard Biener
2020-06-09 14:01 Richard Biener
2019-09-18 12:42 Richard Biener
2019-09-03 10:27 Richard Biener
2015-05-04 11:50 Dominik Vogt
2015-05-04 17:13 ` Jeff Law
2013-01-16 14:51 Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOpC=aUUbMHqEYMAsqDwggQB_OTrc+TONfGbbOd5MUTN3Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    --cc=tobias@codesourcery.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).