Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] sched-deps.cc (find_modifiable_mems): Avoid exponential behavior

["H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 7:02 AM Richard Biener
<richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:39 AM Maxim Kuvyrkov
> <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 17, 2024, at 10:51, Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 3:52 PM Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 1/15/24 05:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
> > >>> Hi Vladimir,
> > >>> Hi Jeff,
> > >>>
> > >>> Richard and Alexander have reviewed this patch and [I assume] have no
> > >>> further comments.  OK to merge?
> > >> I think the question is whether or not we're too late.  I know that
> > >> Richard S has held off on his late-combine pass and I'm holding off on
> > >> the ext-dce work due to the fact that we're well past stage1 close.
> > >>
> > >> I think the release managers ought to have the final say on this.
> > >
> > > I'm fine with this now, it doesn't change code generation.
> >
> > Thanks, Richard.
> >
> > I'll merge the fix for PR96388 and PR111554 -- patch 1/8.  I'll commit cleanups and improvements to scheduler logging -- patches 2/8 - 8/8 -- when stage1 opens.
>
> This seems to have caused a compare-debug bootstrap issue on x86_64-linux,
>
> gcc/fortran/f95-lang.o differs
>
> does n_mem_deps or n_inc_deps include debug insns?
>
> Richard.

FWIW, I opened:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113456

-- 
H.J.