Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Disable test for PR113292 on targets without TLS support

[Christophe Lyon <christophe.lyon@linaro.org>]

On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 08:41, Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu using a cross-compiler to
> arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf with --enable-threads=0 that the link test
> is correctly skipped. OK for trunk?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> This disables the new test added by r14-8168 on machines that don't have
> TLS support, such as bare-metal ARM.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * g++.dg/modules/pr113292_c.C: Require TLS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathaniel Shead <nathanieloshead@gmail.com>
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr113292_c.C | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr113292_c.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr113292_c.C
> index aa3f32ae818..c117c7cfcd4 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr113292_c.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/pr113292_c.C
> @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
>  // PR c++/113292
>  // { dg-module-do link }
> +// { dg-add-options tls }
>  // { dg-additional-options "-fmodules-ts" }
> +// { dg-require-effective-target tls_runtime }
>
Hi,

Thanks, I think this is OK, although I think we prefer to put
dg-require before dg-add-options (after dg-module-do).

Christophe

>  import "pr113292_a.H";
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>