RE: [PATCH v5] RISC-V: Add vector psabi checking.

["Wang, Yanzhang" <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>]

I think it's ok to add it to specific cases and will not affect other cases.
There's not so many cases. And we can revert it after the finalization.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2023 10:53 PM
> To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
> Cc: Wang, Yanzhang <yanzhang.wang@intel.com>; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org;
> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai; Li, Pan2 <pan2.li@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] RISC-V: Add vector psabi checking.
> 
> Hmmm, yeah, I think let's add it case by case...I assume we should get it
> rid before GCC 14, it is mostly used for the transition period before we
> settle down the ABI and for GCC 13.
> 
> On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 10:34 PM Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/12/23 07:36, Wang, Yanzhang via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > I found that add the -Wno-psabi to CFLAGS will be overrode by
> > > dg-options. It seems we can only add this option to the third arg of
> > > dg-runtest. Attach the dg-runtest comments,
> > I think we default to -Wno-psabi to avoid triggering diagnostics in
> > the common case where we aren't concerned about such issues.  So not a
> > surprise that we'll need to work a bit harder to get it added when we
> > do want to check for psabi issues.
> >
> > jeff