* [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr65518.c for RVV[PR112420]
@ 2023-11-07 9:23 Juzhe-Zhong
2023-11-07 12:51 ` Richard Biener
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Juzhe-Zhong @ 2023-11-07 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: rguenther, jeffreyalaw, Juzhe-Zhong
PR target/112420
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c: Fix check for RVV.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
index 3e5b986183c..189a65534f6 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
@@ -49,4 +49,6 @@ int main ()
sub-optimal and causes memory explosion (even though the cost model
should reject that in the end). */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops in function" 2 "vect" } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops in function" 2 "vect" { target {! riscv*-*-* } } } } */
+/* We end up using gathers for the strided load on RISC-V which would be OK. */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "using gather/scatter for strided/grouped access" "vect" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } } */
--
2.36.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr65518.c for RVV[PR112420]
2023-11-07 9:23 [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr65518.c for RVV[PR112420] Juzhe-Zhong
@ 2023-11-07 12:51 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-07 13:32 ` Li, Pan2
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2023-11-07 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Juzhe-Zhong; +Cc: gcc-patches, jeffreyalaw
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> PR target/112420
OK
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c: Fix check for RVV.
>
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
> index 3e5b986183c..189a65534f6 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
> @@ -49,4 +49,6 @@ int main ()
> sub-optimal and causes memory explosion (even though the cost model
> should reject that in the end). */
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops in function" 2 "vect" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops in function" 2 "vect" { target {! riscv*-*-* } } } } */
> +/* We end up using gathers for the strided load on RISC-V which would be OK. */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "using gather/scatter for strided/grouped access" "vect" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } } */
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr65518.c for RVV[PR112420]
2023-11-07 12:51 ` Richard Biener
@ 2023-11-07 13:32 ` Li, Pan2
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Li, Pan2 @ 2023-11-07 13:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Biener, Juzhe-Zhong; +Cc: gcc-patches, jeffreyalaw
Committed, thanks Richard.
Pan
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 8:51 PM
To: Juzhe-Zhong <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; jeffreyalaw@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr65518.c for RVV[PR112420]
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023, Juzhe-Zhong wrote:
> PR target/112420
OK
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c: Fix check for RVV.
>
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
> index 3e5b986183c..189a65534f6 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr65518.c
> @@ -49,4 +49,6 @@ int main ()
> sub-optimal and causes memory explosion (even though the cost model
> should reject that in the end). */
>
> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops in function" 2 "vect" } } */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 0 loops in function" 2 "vect" { target {! riscv*-*-* } } } } */
> +/* We end up using gathers for the strided load on RISC-V which would be OK. */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "using gather/scatter for strided/grouped access" "vect" { target { riscv*-*-* } } } } */
>
--
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH,
Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg, Germany;
GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew McDonald, Werner Knoblich; (HRB 36809, AG Nuernberg)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-07 13:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-11-07 9:23 [PATCH] test: Fix FAIL of pr65518.c for RVV[PR112420] Juzhe-Zhong
2023-11-07 12:51 ` Richard Biener
2023-11-07 13:32 ` Li, Pan2
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).