public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>,
	Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] middle-end, v4: IFN_ASSUME support [PR106654]
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 19:41:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1A20pnavpfU0Zde@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1A2Ofdwdcm93s03@tucnak>

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 07:39:05PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 12:55:12PM -0400, Andrew MacLeod via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > Not sure I understand this part.  op is whatever we pass as the ith
> > > argument to IFN_ASSUME.  I'd expect that at this point one needs to
> > > remap that to the (i-1)th PARM_DECL of assume_id (so e.g. when you
> > > have the above loop you could as well start with DECL_ARGUMENTS and move
> > > that to DECL_CHAIN at the end of every iteration.  And then
> > > query ssa_default_def (DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (assume_id), parm)
> > > in each case and get global range of what that returns.
> > 
> > OK, this is the bit of code I dont know how to write :-)
> > 
> > yes, op is the name of the value within this current function, and yes, that
> > needs to be mapped to the argument decl in the assume function.   Then we
> > need to query what range was given to that name during the assume pass. 
> > when that is returned, the add_range (op, range) will inject it as a side
> > effect.
> > 
> > Can you write that loop?
> 
> I meant something like (untested code):
>        && gimple_call_internal_fn (s) == IFN_ASSUME)
>      {
>        tree assume_id = gimple_call_arg (s, 0);
> -      for (unsigned i = 1; i < gimple_call_num_args (s); i++)
> +      tree parm = DECL_ARGUMENTS (assume_id);
> +      struct function *fun = DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (assume_id);
> +      for (unsigned i = 1;
> +	   i < gimple_call_num_args (s) && parm;
> +	   i++, parm = DECL_CHAIN (parm))
>  	{
>  	  tree op = gimple_call_arg (s, i);
>  	  tree type = TREE_TYPE (op);
> +	  tree arg = ssa_default_def (fun, parm);
> +	  if (arg == NULL_TREE)
> +	    continue;
>  	  if (gimple_range_ssa_p (op) && Value_Range::supports_type_p (type))
>  	    {
>  	      Value_Range assume_range (type);
> and querying SSA_NAME_RANGE_INFO of arg rather than op.

Oops, the tree arg = ... stuff would need to be moved into the if (gimple_range...)
body, it won't work for aggregate PARM_DECLs etc., only PARM_DECLs with
is_gimple_reg_type (TREE_TYPE (arg)).

	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-19 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-10  8:54 [PATCH] middle-end " Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-10 21:09 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-10 21:19   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-11 13:36     ` [PATCH] middle-end, v2: " Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-12 15:48       ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-13  6:50         ` [PATCH] middle-end, v3: " Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-14 11:27           ` Richard Biener
2022-10-14 18:33             ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-17  6:55               ` Richard Biener
2022-10-17 15:44             ` [PATCH] middle-end, v4: " Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-18  7:00               ` Richard Biener
2022-10-18 21:31               ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-19 16:06                 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-19 16:55                   ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-19 17:39                     ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-19 17:41                       ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2022-10-19 18:25                         ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-19 17:14                   ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-11 18:05 ` [PATCH] middle-end " Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-12 10:15   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-12 14:31     ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-12 14:39       ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-12 16:12         ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-13  8:11           ` Richard Biener
2022-10-13  9:53             ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-13 13:16               ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-13  9:57           ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-17 17:53     ` Andrew MacLeod
2022-10-14 20:43 ` Martin Uecker
2022-10-14 21:20   ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-15  8:07     ` Martin Uecker
2022-10-15  8:53       ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-17  5:52         ` Martin Uecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1A20pnavpfU0Zde@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jh@suse.cz \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).