[PATCH] c: Stray inform note with -Waddress [PR106947]

[PATCH] c: Stray inform note with -Waddress [PR106947]

[Marek Polacek]

A trivial fix for maybe_warn_for_null_address where we print an
inform note without first checking the return value of a warning
call.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/12?

	PR c/106947

gcc/c/ChangeLog:

	* c-typeck.cc (maybe_warn_for_null_address): Don't emit stray
	notes.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* c-c++-common/Waddress-7.c: New test.
---
 gcc/c/c-typeck.cc                       | 19 ++++++++++---------
 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-7.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-7.c

diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
index 43a910d5df2..33d1e8439db 100644
--- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
+++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
@@ -11738,18 +11738,19 @@ maybe_warn_for_null_address (location_t loc, tree op, tree_code code)
       || from_macro_expansion_at (loc))
     return;
 
+  bool w;
   if (code == EQ_EXPR)
-    warning_at (loc, OPT_Waddress,
-		"the comparison will always evaluate as %<false%> "
-		"for the address of %qE will never be NULL",
-		op);
+    w = warning_at (loc, OPT_Waddress,
+		    "the comparison will always evaluate as %<false%> "
+		    "for the address of %qE will never be NULL",
+		    op);
   else
-    warning_at (loc, OPT_Waddress,
-		"the comparison will always evaluate as %<true%> "
-		"for the address of %qE will never be NULL",
-		op);
+    w = warning_at (loc, OPT_Waddress,
+		    "the comparison will always evaluate as %<true%> "
+		    "for the address of %qE will never be NULL",
+		    op);
 
-  if (DECL_P (op))
+  if (w && DECL_P (op))
     inform (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (op), "%qD declared here", op);
 }
 
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-7.c b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-7.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..179948553c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/Waddress-7.c
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/* PR c/106947 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-Waddress" } */
+
+#ifndef __cplusplus
+# define bool _Bool
+#endif
+
+#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Waddress"
+int s; /* { dg-bogus "declared" } */
+bool e = &s;
+int
+main ()
+{
+  int error = 0;
+  {
+    bool e1 = &s;
+    if (!e1)
+      error = 1;
+  }
+  return error;
+}

base-commit: de40fab2f32b03c3d8f69f72c7f1e38694f93d35
-- 
2.37.3

Re: [PATCH] c: Stray inform note with -Waddress [PR106947]

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 02:25:59PM -0400, Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> A trivial fix for maybe_warn_for_null_address where we print an
> inform note without first checking the return value of a warning
> call.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk/12?
> 
> 	PR c/106947
> 
> gcc/c/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* c-typeck.cc (maybe_warn_for_null_address): Don't emit stray
> 	notes.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* c-c++-common/Waddress-7.c: New test.

Ok, thanks.

	Jakub