public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tree-optimization/109170 - bogus use-after-free with __builtin_expect
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 14:22:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBhd/rwNkNxMjSCR@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <nycvar.YFH.7.77.849.2303201211160.18795@jbgna.fhfr.qr>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 12:12:14PM +0000, Richard Biener wrote:
> 	PR tree-optimization/109170
> 	* gimple-range-op.cc (cfn_pass_through_arg1): New.
> 	(gimple_range_op_handler::maybe_builtin_call): Handle
> 	__builtin_expect and similar via cfn_pass_through_arg1
> 	and inspecting the calls fnspec.
> 	* builtins.cc (builtin_fnspec): Handle BUILT_IN_EXPECT
> 	and BUILT_IN_EXPECT_WITH_PROBABILITY.

I'm still worried about this builtins.cc change, can't we defer
that part till GCC 14 where there will be enough time to see if it
doesn't result in some undesirable problems (__builtin_expect* being
optimized away when it still shouldn't etc.)?
> 
> 	* gcc.dg/Wuse-after-free-pr109170.c: New testcase.
> 	* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-lim-21.c: Adjust.
> 	* gcc.dg/predict-20.c: Likewise.

Otherwise LGTM.

	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-17 12:18 Richard Biener
2023-03-17 12:43 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-17 12:53   ` Richard Biener
2023-03-17 12:59     ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-17 13:55       ` Richard Biener
2023-03-17 14:03         ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-17 14:18           ` Richard Biener
2023-03-17 14:52             ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-20  8:21               ` Richard Biener
2023-03-20 12:12                 ` Richard Biener
2023-03-20 13:22                   ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2023-03-21  8:21                     ` Richard Biener
2023-03-21  8:23                       ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-03-17 13:59       ` Andrew MacLeod
2023-04-27 12:10 Richard Biener
     [not found] <34641.123042708104200740@us-mta-611.us.mimecast.lan>
2023-04-27 12:11 ` Jakub Jelinek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBhd/rwNkNxMjSCR@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).