From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge@baylibre.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>,
Eric Botcazou <botcazou@adacore.com>,
Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtlanal: Fix set_noop_p for volatile loads or stores [PR114768]
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 12:30:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZiJHwYOa7QekdT6q@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmot3b3s.fsf@euler.schwinge.ddns.net>
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 12:23:03PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> On 2024-04-19T08:24:03+0200, Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com> wrote:
> > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr114768.c.jj 2024-04-18 15:37:49.139433678 +0200
> > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr114768.c 2024-04-18 15:43:30.389730365 +0200
> > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
> > +/* PR rtl-optimization/114768 */
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-rtl-final" } */
> > +/* { dg-final { scan-rtl-dump "\\\(mem/v:" "final" { target { ! { nvptx*-*-* } } } } } */
> > +
> > +void
> > +foo (int *p)
> > +{
> > + *p = *(volatile int *) p;
> > +}
>
> Why exclude nvptx target here? As far as I can see, it does behave in
> the exactly same way as expected; see 'diff' of before vs. after the
> 'gcc/rtlanal.cc' code changes:
I wasn't sure if the non-RA targets (for which we don't have an effective
target) even have final dump.
If they do as you show, then guess the target guard can go.
Jakub
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 6:24 Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-19 6:33 ` Richard Biener
2024-04-19 10:23 ` Thomas Schwinge
2024-04-19 10:30 ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2024-04-19 10:39 ` Enable 'gcc.dg/pr114768.c' for nvptx target [PR114768] (was: [PATCH] rtlanal: Fix set_noop_p for volatile loads or stores [PR114768]) Thomas Schwinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZiJHwYOa7QekdT6q@tucnak \
--to=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=botcazou@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=tschwinge@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).