public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@redhat.com>, Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>,
	gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
	Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] c++, v3: Retry the aliasing of base/complete cdtor optimization at import_export_decl time [PR113208]
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 00:47:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZimMH1d8gWSthdGz@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cc3d167a-3bd8-4cc8-96bc-c9c313cf2e7e@redhat.com>

On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 06:39:33PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > --- gcc/cp/decl2.cc.jj	2024-04-23 14:49:41.933186265 +0200
> > +++ gcc/cp/decl2.cc	2024-04-24 15:17:09.043625729 +0200
> > @@ -3314,7 +3314,16 @@ tentative_decl_linkage (tree decl)
> >   	     to mark the functions at this point.  */
> >   	  if (DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (decl)
> >   	      && (!DECL_IMPLICIT_INSTANTIATION (decl)
> > -		  || DECL_DEFAULTED_FN (decl)))
> > +		  || DECL_DEFAULTED_FN (decl)
> > +		  /* For implicit instantiations of cdtors,
> > +		     if import_export_decl would use comdat linkage,
> > +		     make sure to use it right away, so that maybe_clone_body
> > +		     can use aliases.  See PR113208.  */
> > +		  || (DECL_MAYBE_IN_CHARGE_CDTOR_P (decl)
> > +		      && (flag_implicit_templates
> > +			  || flag_implicit_inline_templates)
> > +		      && flag_weak
> > +		      && TARGET_SUPPORTS_ALIASES)))
> 
> It seems wrong to set DECL_INTERFACE_KNOWN for cdtors that might get an
> explicit instantiation later, and likewise for comdat_linkage when
> !flag_weak; instead of adding this condition to the if, how about adding an
> else like
> 
> >           else if (DECL_MAYBE_IN_CHARGE_CDTOR_P (decl))
> >             /* For implicit instantiations of cdtors,
> > if import_export_decl would use comdat linkage,
> > make sure to use it right away, so that maybe_clone_body
> > can use aliases.  See PR113208.  */
> >             maybe_make_one_only (decl);
> 
> ?

Then can_alias_cdtor would return false, because it ends with:
  /* Don't use aliases for weak/linkonce definitions unless we can put both
     symbols in the same COMDAT group.  */
  return (DECL_INTERFACE_KNOWN (fn)
          && (SUPPORTS_ONE_ONLY || !DECL_WEAK (fn))
          && (!DECL_ONE_ONLY (fn)
              || (HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP && DECL_WEAK (fn))));
Should we change that DECL_INTERFACE_KNOWN (fn) in there to
(DECL_INTERFACE_KNOWN (fn) || something) then and what that
something should be?  HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP && DECL_ONE_ONLY (fn)?

	Jakub


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-24 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-04-17  7:42 [PATCH] c++: " Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-17  9:04 ` Jan Hubicka
2024-04-17 12:32   ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-17 13:26     ` Jan Hubicka
2024-04-17 14:07       ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-17 14:34         ` Jan Hubicka
2024-04-17 14:39           ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-22 15:42 ` [PATCH] c++, v2: " Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-23  3:14   ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-23 16:04     ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-24  9:16       ` Jonathan Wakely
2024-04-24 16:16         ` [PATCH] c++, v3: " Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-24 22:39           ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-24 22:47             ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2024-04-25  0:43               ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-25 12:02                 ` [PATCH] c++, v4: " Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-25 14:22                   ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-04-25 15:30                     ` Jason Merrill
2024-04-25 18:42                       ` [PATCH] c++, v5: " Jakub Jelinek
2024-05-09 18:20                       ` [PATCH] c++: Optimize in maybe_clone_body aliases even when not at_eof [PR113208] Jakub Jelinek
2024-05-09 18:58                         ` Marek Polacek
2024-05-09 19:05                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-05-10 19:59                         ` Jason Merrill
2024-05-13 10:19                           ` Jakub Jelinek
2024-05-14 22:20                             ` Jason Merrill

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZimMH1d8gWSthdGz@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jason@redhat.com \
    --cc=jh@suse.cz \
    --cc=jwakely@redhat.com \
    --cc=ppalka@redhat.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).