public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Fangrui Song <maskray@google.com>,
	Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] testsuite: Add a test case for PR110729
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 18:13:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a793b7d9-2235-f1c5-1591-92075b8c0b99@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

Hi,

As PR110729 reported, there was one issue for .section
__patchable_function_entries with -ffunction-sections, that
is we put the same symbol as link_to section symbol for all
functions wrongly.  The commit r13-4294 for PR99889 has
fixed this with the corresponding label LPFE* which sits in
the function_section.

As Fangrui suggested[1], this patch is to add a bit more test
coverage.  I didn't find a good way to check all linked_to
symbols are different, so I checked for LPFE[012] here.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-July/624866.html

Tested well on x86_64-redhat-linux, powerpc64-linux-gnu
P7/P8/P9 and powerpc64le-linux-gnu P9/P10.

Is it ok for trunk?

BR,
Kewen
-----
	PR testsuite/110729

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* gcc.dg/pr110729.c: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110729.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110729.c

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110729.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110729.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..92dfd8ae000
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr110729.c
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target { ! { nvptx*-*-* visium-*-* } } } } */
+/* { dg-require-effective-target o_flag_in_section } */
+/* { dg-options "-ffunction-sections -fpatchable-function-entry=2" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-fno-pie" { target sparc*-*-* } } */
+
+/* Verify there are three different link_to symbols for three
+    .section __patchable_function_entries respectively.  */
+
+int
+f ()
+{
+  return 1;
+}
+
+int
+g ()
+{
+  return 2;
+}
+
+int
+h ()
+{
+  return 3;
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {.section[\t ]*__patchable_function_entries,.*,\.LPFE0} 1 } }  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {.section[\t ]*__patchable_function_entries,.*,\.LPFE1} 1 } }  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times {.section[\t ]*__patchable_function_entries,.*,\.LPFE2} 1 } }  */
--
2.39.3

             reply	other threads:[~2023-07-20 10:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-20 10:13 Kewen.Lin [this message]
2023-07-20 12:34 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-07-21  5:22   ` Kewen.Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a793b7d9-2235-f1c5-1591-92075b8c0b99@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=maskray@google.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).