From: Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
To: Paul Iannetta <piannetta@kalrayinc.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] c++: parser - Support for target address spaces in C++
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:55:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9ae9538-b465-108d-217d-d1047f9715f5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018170135.zpkmyebmpcvqx7ky@ws2202.lin.mbt.kalray.eu>
On 10/18/22 13:01, Paul Iannetta wrote:
> Thank you very much for the detailed review.
>
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 10:24:23AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 10/18/22 03:37, Paul Iannetta wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 14, 2022 at 11:19:50AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>> On 10/13/22 17:57, Paul Iannetta wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 03:41:16PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/13/22 12:02, Paul Iannetta wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:47:42AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/13/22 11:23, Paul Iannetta wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 11:02:24AM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/12/22 20:52, Paul Iannetta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> There are quite a few things I would like to clarify concerning some
>>>>>>>>>>> implementation details.
>>>>>>>>>>> - A variable with automatic storage (which is neither a pointer nor
>>>>>>>>>>> a reference) cannot be qualified with an address space. I detect
>>>>>>>>>>> this by the combination of `sc_none' and `! toplevel_bindings_p ()',
>>>>>>>>>>> but I've also seen the use of `at_function_scope' at other places.
>>>>>>>>>>> And I'm unsure which one is appropriate here.
>>>>>>>>>>> This detection happens at the very end of grokdeclarator because I
>>>>>>>>>>> need to know that the type is a pointer, which is not know until
>>>>>>>>>>> very late in the function.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> At that point you have the decl, and you can ask directly what its storage
>>>>>>>>>> duration is, perhaps using decl_storage_duration.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But why do you need to know whether the type is a pointer? The attribute
>>>>>>>>>> applies to the target type of the pointer, not the pointer type. I think
>>>>>>>>>> the problem is that you're looking at declspecs when you ought to be looking
>>>>>>>>>> at type_quals.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I need to know that the base type is a pointer to reject invalid
>>>>>>>>> declarations such as:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> int f (__seg_fs int a) { } or int f () { __seg_fs int a; }
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> because parameters and auto variables can have an address space
>>>>>>>>> qualifier only if they are pointer or reference type, which I can't
>>>>>>>>> tell only from type_quals.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But "int *__seg_fs a" is just as invalid as the above; the difference is not
>>>>>>>> whether a is a pointer, but whether the address-space-qualified is the type
>>>>>>>> of a itself or some sub-type.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree that "int * __seg_fs a" is invalid but it is accepted by the C
>>>>>>> front-end, and by clang (both C and C++), the behavior is that the
>>>>>>> address-name is silently ignored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, that sounds like a bug; in that case, presumably the user meant to
>>>>>> qualify the pointed-to type, and silently ignoring seems unlikely to give
>>>>>> the effect they want.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, actually, I'm re-reading the draft and "int * __seg_fs a" is
>>>>> valid. It means "pointer in address space __seg_fs pointing to an
>>>>> object in the generic address space", whereas "__seg_fs int * a" means
>>>>> "pointer in the generic address space pointing to an object in the
>>>>> __seg_fs address-space".
>>>>>
>>>>> Oddities such as, "__seg_fs int * __seg_gs a" are also perfectly
>>>>> valid.
>>>>
>>>> If a has static storage duration, sure; I was still thinking about
>>>> declarations with automatic storage duration such as in your example above.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, I only use type_quals now. I also took into account the style
>>> recommendations from Jakub, and included the other template tests.
>>> I rebased over trunk, bootstrapped the compiler and run the "make
>>> check-gcc" with no regressions on x86.
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>> # ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
>>> Add support for custom address spaces in C++
>>>
>>> gcc/
>>> * tree.h (ENCODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE): Missing parentheses.
>>>
>>> gcc/c/
>>> * c-decl.cc: Remove c_register_addr_space.
>>>
>>> gcc/c-family/
>>> * c-common.cc (c_register_addr_space): Imported from c-decl.cc
>>> (addr_space_superset): Imported from gcc/c/c-typecheck.cc
>>> * c-common.h: Remove the FIXME.
>>> (addr_space_superset): New declaration.
>>>
>>> gcc/cp/
>>> * cp-tree.h (enum cp_decl_spec): Add addr_space support.
>>> (struct cp_decl_specifier_seq): Likewise.
>>> * decl.cc (get_type_quals): Likewise.
>>> (check_tag_decl): Likewise.
>>> (grokdeclarator): Likewise.
>>> * parser.cc (cp_parser_type_specifier): Likewise.
>>> (cp_parser_cv_qualifier_seq_opt): Likewise.
>>> (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Likewise.
>>> (cp_parser_type_specifier): Likewise.
>>> (set_and_check_decl_spec_loc): Likewise.
>>> * typeck.cc (composite_pointer_type): Likewise
>>> (comp_ptr_ttypes_real): Likewise.
>>> (same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p): Likewise.
>>> * pt.cc (check_cv_quals_for_unify): Likewise.
>>> (unify): Likewise.
>>> * tree.cc: Remove c_register_addr_space stub.
>>> * mangle.cc (write_CV_qualifiers_for_type): Mangle address spaces
>>> using the extended qualifier notation.
>>>
>>> gcc/doc
>>> * extend.texi (Named Address Spaces): add a mention about C++
>>> support.
>>>
>>> gcc/testsuite/
>>> * g++.dg/abi/mangle-addr-space1.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/abi/mangle-addr-space2.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/parse/addr-space.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/parse/addr-space1.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/parse/addr-space2.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/parse/template/spec-addr-space.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/ext/addr-space-decl.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/ext/addr-space-ref.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/ext/addr-space-ops.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/template/addr-space-overload.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/template/addr-space-strip1.C: New test.
>>> * g++.dg/template/addr-space-strip2.C: New test.
>>>
>>> # ------------------------ >8 ------------------------
>>> diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc b/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
>>> index 9ec9100cc90..3b79dc47515 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.cc
>>> @@ -588,6 +588,33 @@ c_addr_space_name (addr_space_t as)
>>> return IDENTIFIER_POINTER (ridpointers [rid]);
>>> }
>>> +/* Return true if between two named address spaces, whether there is a superset
>>> + named address space that encompasses both address spaces. If there is a
>>> + superset, return which address space is the superset. */
>>> +
>>> +bool
>>> +addr_space_superset (addr_space_t as1, addr_space_t as2,
>>> + addr_space_t * common)
>>> +{
>>> + if (as1 == as2)
>>> + {
>>> + *common = as1;
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> + else if (targetm.addr_space.subset_p (as1, as2))
>>> + {
>>> + *common = as2;
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> + else if (targetm.addr_space.subset_p (as2, as1))
>>> + {
>>> + *common = as1;
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> + else
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /* Push current bindings for the function name VAR_DECLS. */
>>> void
>>> @@ -2785,6 +2812,25 @@ c_build_bitfield_integer_type (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT width, int unsignedp)
>>> return build_nonstandard_integer_type (width, unsignedp);
>>> }
>>> +/* Register reserved keyword WORD as qualifier for address space AS. */
>>> +
>>> +void
>>> +c_register_addr_space (const char *word, addr_space_t as)
>>> +{
>>> + int rid = RID_FIRST_ADDR_SPACE + as;
>>> + tree id;
>>> +
>>> + /* Address space qualifiers are only supported
>>> + in C with GNU extensions enabled. */
>>> + if (c_dialect_objc () || flag_no_asm)
>>> + return;
>>> +
>>> + id = get_identifier (word);
>>> + C_SET_RID_CODE (id, rid);
>>> + TREE_LANG_FLAG_0 (id) = 1;
>>> + ridpointers[rid] = id;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> /* The C version of the register_builtin_type langhook. */
>>> void
>>> diff --git a/gcc/c-family/c-common.h b/gcc/c-family/c-common.h
>>> index 62ab4ba437b..a3864d874aa 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/c-family/c-common.h
>>> +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-common.h
>>> @@ -829,12 +829,11 @@ extern const struct attribute_spec c_common_format_attribute_table[];
>>> extern tree (*make_fname_decl) (location_t, tree, int);
>>> -/* In c-decl.cc and cp/tree.cc. FIXME. */
>>> -extern void c_register_addr_space (const char *str, addr_space_t as);
>>> -
>>> /* In c-common.cc. */
>>> extern bool in_late_binary_op;
>>> extern const char *c_addr_space_name (addr_space_t as);
>>> +extern const char *c_addr_space_name (addr_space_t as);
>>> +extern bool addr_space_superset (addr_space_t, addr_space_t, addr_space_t *);
>>> extern tree identifier_global_value (tree);
>>> extern tree identifier_global_tag (tree);
>>> extern bool names_builtin_p (const char *);
>>> @@ -951,6 +950,7 @@ extern bool c_common_init (void);
>>> extern void c_common_finish (void);
>>> extern void c_common_parse_file (void);
>>> extern alias_set_type c_common_get_alias_set (tree);
>>> +extern void c_register_addr_space (const char *, addr_space_t);
>>> extern void c_register_builtin_type (tree, const char*);
>>> extern bool c_promoting_integer_type_p (const_tree);
>>> extern bool self_promoting_args_p (const_tree);
>>> diff --git a/gcc/c/c-decl.cc b/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
>>> index a7571cc7542..b1f69997ff7 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/c/c-decl.cc
>>> @@ -12531,25 +12531,6 @@ c_parse_final_cleanups (void)
>>> ext_block = NULL;
>>> }
>>> -/* Register reserved keyword WORD as qualifier for address space AS. */
>>> -
>>> -void
>>> -c_register_addr_space (const char *word, addr_space_t as)
>>> -{
>>> - int rid = RID_FIRST_ADDR_SPACE + as;
>>> - tree id;
>>> -
>>> - /* Address space qualifiers are only supported
>>> - in C with GNU extensions enabled. */
>>> - if (c_dialect_objc () || flag_no_asm)
>>> - return;
>>> -
>>> - id = get_identifier (word);
>>> - C_SET_RID_CODE (id, rid);
>>> - C_IS_RESERVED_WORD (id) = 1;
>>> - ridpointers [rid] = id;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /* Return identifier to look up for omp declare reduction. */
>>> tree
>>> diff --git a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
>>> index fdb96c28c51..2a700bbaff3 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/c/c-typeck.cc
>>> @@ -303,32 +303,6 @@ c_type_promotes_to (tree type)
>>> return type;
>>> }
>>> -/* Return true if between two named address spaces, whether there is a superset
>>> - named address space that encompasses both address spaces. If there is a
>>> - superset, return which address space is the superset. */
>>> -
>>> -static bool
>>> -addr_space_superset (addr_space_t as1, addr_space_t as2, addr_space_t *common)
>>> -{
>>> - if (as1 == as2)
>>> - {
>>> - *common = as1;
>>> - return true;
>>> - }
>>> - else if (targetm.addr_space.subset_p (as1, as2))
>>> - {
>>> - *common = as2;
>>> - return true;
>>> - }
>>> - else if (targetm.addr_space.subset_p (as2, as1))
>>> - {
>>> - *common = as1;
>>> - return true;
>>> - }
>>> - else
>>> - return false;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /* Return a variant of TYPE which has all the type qualifiers of LIKE
>>> as well as those of TYPE. */
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>>> index e2607f09c19..0248569a95b 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/cp-tree.h
>>> @@ -6235,6 +6235,7 @@ enum cp_decl_spec {
>>> ds_const,
>>> ds_volatile,
>>> ds_restrict,
>>> + ds_addr_space,
>>> ds_inline,
>>> ds_virtual,
>>> ds_explicit,
>>> @@ -6281,6 +6282,8 @@ struct cp_decl_specifier_seq {
>>> cp_storage_class storage_class;
>>> /* For the __intN declspec, this stores the index into the int_n_* arrays. */
>>> int int_n_idx;
>>> + /* The address space that the declaration belongs to. */
>>> + addr_space_t address_space;
>>> /* True iff TYPE_SPEC defines a class or enum. */
>>> BOOL_BITFIELD type_definition_p : 1;
>>> /* True iff multiple types were (erroneously) specified for this
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>>> index 85b892cddf0..a87fed04529 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
>>> @@ -5290,6 +5290,8 @@ get_type_quals (const cp_decl_specifier_seq *declspecs)
>>> type_quals |= TYPE_QUAL_VOLATILE;
>>> if (decl_spec_seq_has_spec_p (declspecs, ds_restrict))
>>> type_quals |= TYPE_QUAL_RESTRICT;
>>> + if (decl_spec_seq_has_spec_p (declspecs, ds_addr_space))
>>> + type_quals |= ENCODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (declspecs->address_space);
>>> return type_quals;
>>> }
>>> @@ -5412,6 +5414,10 @@ check_tag_decl (cp_decl_specifier_seq *declspecs,
>>> error_at (declspecs->locations[ds_restrict],
>>> "%<__restrict%> can only be specified for objects and "
>>> "functions");
>>> + else if (decl_spec_seq_has_spec_p (declspecs, ds_addr_space))
>>> + error_at (declspecs->locations[ds_addr_space],
>>> + "address space can only be specified for objects and "
>>> + "functions");
>>> else if (decl_spec_seq_has_spec_p (declspecs, ds_thread))
>>> error_at (declspecs->locations[ds_thread],
>>> "%<__thread%> can only be specified for objects "
>>> @@ -14608,6 +14614,59 @@ grokdeclarator (const cp_declarator *declarator,
>>> if (!processing_template_decl)
>>> cp_apply_type_quals_to_decl (type_quals, decl);
>>> + /* Warn about address space used for things other than static memory or
>>> + pointers. */
>>> + addr_space_t address_space = DECODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (type_quals);
>>> + if (!ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC_P (address_space))
>>> + {
>>> + if (decl_context == NORMAL)
>>> + {
>>> + switch (storage_class)
>>
>> I would still suggest checking decl_storage_duration at this point rather
>> than the storage_class specifier.
>
> Unless I misunderstand something, I can't weed out register variables
> if I rely on decl_storage_duration.
Yes, but register variables are automatic, so they'll get that error; I
don't think they need their own specific error.
>>> + {
>>> + case sc_auto:
>>> + error ("%qs combined with C++98 %<auto%> qualifier for %qs",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (address_space), name);
>>> + break;
>>> + case sc_register:
>>> + error ("%qs combined with %<register%> qualifier for %qs",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (address_space), name);
>>> + break;
>>> + case sc_none:
>>> + if (! toplevel_bindings_p ())
>>> + error ("%qs specified for auto variable %qs",
>>
>> And let's refer to automatic storage duration rather than shorten to 'auto'.
>>
> Right.
>>> + c_addr_space_name (address_space), name);
>>> + break;
>>> + case sc_mutable:
>>> + error ("%qs combined with %<mutable%> qualifier for %qs",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (address_space), name);
>>> + break;
>>> + case sc_static:
>>> + case sc_extern:
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + gcc_unreachable ();
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + else if (decl_context == PARM && TREE_CODE (type) != ARRAY_TYPE)
>>> + {
>>> + if (name)
>>> + error ("%qs specified for parameter %qs",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (address_space), name);
>>> + else
>>> + error ("%qs specified for unnamed parameter",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (address_space));
>>> + }
>>> + else if (decl_context == FIELD)
>>> + {
>>> + if (name)
>>> + error ("%qs specified for structure field %qs",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (address_space), name);
>>> + else
>>> + error ("%qs specified for structure field",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (address_space));
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> return decl;
>>> }
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/mangle.cc b/gcc/cp/mangle.cc
>>> index 1215463089b..aafff98f05a 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/mangle.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/mangle.cc
>>> @@ -2520,6 +2520,14 @@ write_CV_qualifiers_for_type (const tree type)
>>> array. */
>>> cp_cv_quals quals = TYPE_QUALS (type);
>>> + if (addr_space_t as = DECODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (quals))
>>> + {
>>> + const char *as_name = c_addr_space_name (as);
>>> + write_char ('U');
>>> + write_unsigned_number (strlen (as_name));
>>> + write_string (as_name);
>>> + ++num_qualifiers;
>>> + }
>>> if (quals & TYPE_QUAL_RESTRICT)
>>> {
>>> write_char ('r');
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
>>> index 9ddfb027ff9..c82059d1efd 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
>>> @@ -7703,6 +7703,15 @@ cp_parser_postfix_expression (cp_parser *parser, bool address_p, bool cast_p,
>>> postfix_expression = error_mark_node;
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> + if (type != error_mark_node
>>> + && !ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC_P (TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (type))
>>> + && current_function_decl)
>>> + {
>>> + error
>>> + ("compound literal qualified by address-space "
>>> + "qualifier");
>>> + type = error_mark_node;
>>> + }
>>> /* Form the representation of the compound-literal. */
>>> postfix_expression
>>> = finish_compound_literal (type, initializer,
>>> @@ -19445,6 +19454,15 @@ cp_parser_type_specifier (cp_parser* parser,
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> + if (RID_FIRST_ADDR_SPACE <= keyword && keyword <= RID_LAST_ADDR_SPACE)
>>> + {
>>> + ds = ds_addr_space;
>>> + if (is_cv_qualifier)
>>> + *is_cv_qualifier = true;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> +
>>
>> I don't think we need two blank lines before and after this block, one each
>> should be enough.
>>
> Indeed.
>>> /* Handle simple keywords. */
>>> if (ds != ds_last)
>>> {
>>> @@ -23837,6 +23855,7 @@ cp_parser_ptr_operator (cp_parser* parser,
>>> GNU Extension:
>>> cv-qualifier:
>>> + address-space-qualifier
>>> __restrict__
>>> Returns a bitmask representing the cv-qualifiers. */
>>> @@ -23873,6 +23892,11 @@ cp_parser_cv_qualifier_seq_opt (cp_parser* parser)
>>> break;
>>> }
>>> + if (RID_FIRST_ADDR_SPACE <= token->keyword
>>> + && token->keyword <= RID_LAST_ADDR_SPACE)
>>> + cv_qualifier
>>> + = ENCODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (token->keyword - RID_FIRST_ADDR_SPACE);
>>> +
>>> if (!cv_qualifier)
>>> break;
>>> @@ -32893,6 +32917,8 @@ set_and_check_decl_spec_loc (cp_decl_specifier_seq *decl_specs,
>>> decl_specs->locations[ds] = location;
>>> if (ds == ds_thread)
>>> decl_specs->gnu_thread_keyword_p = token_is__thread (token);
>>> + else if (ds == ds_addr_space)
>>> + decl_specs->address_space = token->keyword - RID_FIRST_ADDR_SPACE;
>>> }
>>> else
>>> {
>>> @@ -32925,6 +32951,25 @@ set_and_check_decl_spec_loc (cp_decl_specifier_seq *decl_specs,
>>> error_at (&richloc, "duplicate %qD", token->u.value);
>>> }
>>> }
>>> + else if (ds == ds_addr_space)
>>> + {
>>> + addr_space_t as1 = decl_specs->address_space;
>>> + addr_space_t as2 = token->keyword - RID_FIRST_ADDR_SPACE;
>>> +
>>> + gcc_rich_location richloc (location);
>>> + richloc.add_fixit_remove ();
>>> + if (!ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC_P (as1) && !ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC_P (as2)
>>> + && as1 != as2)
>>> + error_at (&richloc,
>>> + "conflicting named address spaces (%s vs %s)",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (as1), c_addr_space_name (as2));
>>> + if (as1 == as2 && !ADDR_SPACE_GENERIC_P (as1))
>>> + error_at (&richloc,
>>> + "duplicate named address space %s",
>>> + c_addr_space_name (as1));
>>> +
>>> + decl_specs->address_space = as2;
>>> + }
>>> else
>>> {
>>> static const char *const decl_spec_names[] = {
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.cc b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>>> index e4dca9d4f9d..7b73a57091e 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/pt.cc
>>> @@ -23778,8 +23778,19 @@ template_decl_level (tree decl)
>>> static int
>>> check_cv_quals_for_unify (int strict, tree arg, tree parm)
>>> {
>>> - int arg_quals = cp_type_quals (arg);
>>> - int parm_quals = cp_type_quals (parm);
>>> + int arg_quals = CLEAR_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (cp_type_quals (arg));
>>> + int parm_quals = CLEAR_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (cp_type_quals (parm));
>>> +
>>> + /* Try to unify ARG's address space into PARM's address space.
>>> + If PARM does not have any address space qualifiers (ie., as_parm is 0),
>>> + there are no constraints on address spaces for this type. */
>>> + addr_space_t as_arg = DECODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (cp_type_quals (arg));
>>> + addr_space_t as_parm = DECODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (cp_type_quals (parm));
>>> + addr_space_t as_common;
>>> + addr_space_superset (as_arg, as_parm, &as_common);
>>> +
>>> + if (!(as_parm == as_common || as_parm == 0))
>>> + return 0;
>>
>> I'd expect address space qualifiers to follow the 'strict' parameter like
>> the other qualifiers; the above test seems to assume
>> UNIFY_ALLOW_{OUTER_,}LESS_CV_QUAL.
>>
> The reason I ignored strict was to enforce that the deduced address
> space is always at most "as_parm" unless "as_parm" is the generic address
> space, and prevent unifying if the two address spaces are disjoint
> unless "parm" does not have any address space constraints; and avoid the
> addition/deletion of an address space to "arg" during the unifying
> process.
>
> Since I don't really understand the whole picture behind strict, and when
> check_cv_quals_for_unify gets called with which variant of restrict it
> might be me who tried to be overcareful when unifying the address
> spaces.
How we need to handle differing qualifiers varies between different
template argument deduction contexts.
The code you wrote above is correct for the function call context, since
https://eel.is/c++draft/temp.deduct.call#4.2 says the deduced type can
be convertable by qualification conversion, i.e. parm more qualified
than arg (and my "LESS" above was backwards). This is a bit different
for address space qualifiers given that the qualification conversion
would be removing the address space qualifier or changing it to a more
general one, but the principle is the same.
But the allowance for qualifier changes doesn't apply to all deduction
contexts: for instance,
template <class T> void f(T * const *);
struct A {
template <class T> operator T**();
};
int main()
{
f((void**)0); // void** -> void*const* is a valid qualification conv
(void *const*)A(); // same conversion
void (*p)(void **) = f; // error, type mismatch
}
so similarly,
template <class T> void f(T **);
struct A {
template <class T> operator T*__seg_fs*();
};
int main()
{
f((void* __seg_fs *)0); // void*__seg_fs* -> void** should be OK
(void **)A(); // same conversion
void (*p)(void * __seg_fs *) = f; // error
}
>>> if (TREE_CODE (parm) == TEMPLATE_TYPE_PARM
>>> && !(strict & UNIFY_ALLOW_OUTER_MORE_CV_QUAL))
>>> @@ -24415,10 +24426,28 @@ unify (tree tparms, tree targs, tree parm, tree arg, int strict,
>>> arg, parm))
>>> return unify_cv_qual_mismatch (explain_p, parm, arg);
>>> + int arg_cv_quals = cp_type_quals (arg);
>>> + int parm_cv_quals = cp_type_quals (parm);
>>> +
>>> + /* If PARM does not contain any address spaces constraints it can
>>> + fully match the address space of ARG. However, if PARM contains an
>>> + address space constraints, it becomes the upper bound. That is,
>>> + AS_ARG may be promoted to AS_PARM but not the converse. If we
>>> + ended up here, it means that `check_cv_quals_for_unify' succeeded
>>> + and that either AS_PARM is 0 (ie., no constraints) or AS_COMMON ==
>>> + AS_PARM. */
>>> + addr_space_t as_arg = DECODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (arg_cv_quals);
>>> + addr_space_t as_parm = DECODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (parm_cv_quals);
>>> + addr_space_t as_common = as_parm ? 0 : as_arg;
>>
>> Hmm, I'd think we also want as_common = as_arg when it's a subset of
>> as_parm.
>
> Let's assume that "PARM" is "__as1 T", and since the call to
> check_cv_quals_for_unify succeeded we know that "as_common" is
> "__as1". That is ARG is of the form "__as2 U" with "__as2" a
> subset of "__as1", hence we are trying to unify
> __as1 T = __as1 U
> which does not give any constraints over PARM since it alreay contains
> the common address space, hence there is no more constraints on T and
> as_common = 0.
Agreed.
> However, if PARM's address space is 0, we are trying to unify
> T = __as1 U
> and we need to add __addr_space1 to the constraints of T.
Agreed.
> If as_parm is not the generic address space (ie, as_parm != 0)
Looks like this comment got cut off? This is the case I was talking
about. When we are trying to unify
__as1 T = __as2 U
and __as2 is a subset of __as1, I think we want T to be deduced to __as2
U, and then substitution will need to handle substituting __as2 U for T
into __as1 T to get __as2 U.
>>> /* Consider the case where ARG is `const volatile int' and
>>> PARM is `const T'. Then, T should be `volatile int'. */
>>> arg = cp_build_qualified_type
>>> (arg, cp_type_quals (arg) & ~cp_type_quals (parm), tf_none);
>>> + int unified_cv =
>>> + (CLEAR_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (arg_cv_quals & ~parm_cv_quals)
>>> + | ENCODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (as_common));
>>> + arg = cp_build_qualified_type (arg, unified_cv, tf_none);
>>> if (arg == error_mark_node)
>>> return unify_invalid (explain_p);
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/tree.cc b/gcc/cp/tree.cc
>>> index 45348c58bb6..1f330ca93ed 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/tree.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/tree.cc
>>> @@ -6072,15 +6072,6 @@ cp_free_lang_data (tree t)
>>> DECL_CHAIN (t) = NULL_TREE;
>>> }
>>> -/* Stub for c-common. Please keep in sync with c-decl.cc.
>>> - FIXME: If address space support is target specific, then this
>>> - should be a C target hook. But currently this is not possible,
>>> - because this function is called via REGISTER_TARGET_PRAGMAS. */
>>> -void
>>> -c_register_addr_space (const char * /*word*/, addr_space_t /*as*/)
>>> -{
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> /* Return the number of operands in T that we care about for things like
>>> mangling. */
>>> diff --git a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
>>> index da0e1427b97..93cfdc70e2d 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
>>> +++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
>>> @@ -803,10 +803,28 @@ composite_pointer_type (const op_location_t &location,
>>> else
>>> return error_mark_node;
>>> }
>>> + /* If possible merge the address space into the superset of the address
>>> + spaces of t1 and t2, or raise an error. */
>>> + addr_space_t as_t1 = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (t1);
>>> + addr_space_t as_t2 = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (t2);
>>> + addr_space_t as_common;
>>> +
>>> + /* If the two named address spaces are different, determine the common
>>> + superset address space. If there isn't one, raise an error. */
>>> + if (!addr_space_superset (as_t1, as_t2, &as_common))
>>> + {
>>> + as_common = as_t1;
>>> + error_at (location,
>>> + "%qT and %qT are in disjoint named address spaces",
>>> + t1, t2);
>>
>> Why not return error_mark_node here?
>>
> That's a mistake. Thanks.
>>> + }
>>> + int quals_t1 = cp_type_quals (TREE_TYPE (t1));
>>> + int quals_t2 = cp_type_quals (TREE_TYPE (t2));
>>> result_type
>>> = cp_build_qualified_type (void_type_node,
>>> - (cp_type_quals (TREE_TYPE (t1))
>>> - | cp_type_quals (TREE_TYPE (t2))));
>>> + (CLEAR_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (quals_t1)
>>> + | CLEAR_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (quals_t2)
>>> + | ENCODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE (as_common)));
>>> result_type = build_pointer_type (result_type);
>>> /* Merge the attributes. */
>>> attributes = (*targetm.merge_type_attributes) (t1, t2);
>>> @@ -1731,7 +1749,9 @@ comptypes (tree t1, tree t2, int strict)
>>> }
>>> /* Returns nonzero iff TYPE1 and TYPE2 are the same type, ignoring
>>> - top-level qualifiers. */
>>> + top-level qualifiers, except for named address spaces. If the pointers point
>>> + to different named addresses spaces, then we must determine if one address
>>> + space is a subset of the other. */
>>> bool
>>> same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (tree type1, tree type2)
>>> @@ -1741,6 +1761,14 @@ same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p (tree type1, tree type2)
>>> if (type1 == type2)
>>> return true;
>>> + addr_space_t as_type1 = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (type1);
>>> + addr_space_t as_type2 = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (type2);
>>> + addr_space_t as_common;
>>> +
>>> + /* Fail if pointers point to incompatible address spaces. */
>>> + if (!addr_space_superset (as_type1, as_type2, &as_common))
>>> + return false;
>>
>> Why do you need this change? I'd expect this function to ignore top level
>> address space qualifiers like the other qualifiers.
>
> I am mirroring the C front-end here, which does the same thing in
> "comp_target_types" (gcc/c/c-typeck.cc), which ignores qualifiers but
> not address spaces when checking if two pointer types are equivalent.
This function serves a very different function from comp_target_types,
which deals with the types that pointers point to; this function is
ignoring top-level qualifiers that should not affect the type.
...except now I see that cp_build_binary_op is wierdly using this
function for pointer subtraction. I'd think it should use
composite_pointer_type instead, like EQ_EXPR does.
>>> type1 = cp_build_qualified_type (type1, TYPE_UNQUALIFIED);
>>> type2 = cp_build_qualified_type (type2, TYPE_UNQUALIFIED);
>>> return same_type_p (type1, type2);
>>> @@ -6672,10 +6700,32 @@ static tree
>>> pointer_diff (location_t loc, tree op0, tree op1, tree ptrtype,
>>> tsubst_flags_t complain, tree *instrument_expr)
>>> {
>>> - tree result, inttype;
>>> tree restype = ptrdiff_type_node;
>>> + tree result, inttype;
>>> +
>>> + addr_space_t as0 = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op0)));
>>> + addr_space_t as1 = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (TREE_TYPE (op1)));
>>> tree target_type = TREE_TYPE (ptrtype);
>>> + /* If the operands point into different address spaces, we need to
>>> + explicitly convert them to pointers into the common address space
>>> + before we can subtract the numerical address values. */
>>> + if (as0 != as1)
>>> + {
>>> + addr_space_t as_common;
>>> + tree common_type;
>>> +
>>> + /* Determine the common superset address space. This is guaranteed
>>> + to exist because the caller verified that comp_target_types
>>> + returned non-zero. */
>>> + if (!addr_space_superset (as0, as1, &as_common))
>>> + gcc_unreachable ();
>>> +
>>> + common_type = common_pointer_type (TREE_TYPE (op0), TREE_TYPE (op1));
>>> + op0 = convert (common_type, op0);
>>> + op1 = convert (common_type, op1);
>>> + }
>>
>> I think you shouldn't need to change pointer_diff if composite_pointer_type
>> returns error_mark_node above.
>
> I'll have a look, the idea here is to prevent "a - b" with "a" and "b"
> from different address spaces.
As above, I think this should have been handled in cp_build_binary_op.
>>> if (!complete_type_or_maybe_complain (target_type, NULL_TREE, complain))
>>> return error_mark_node;
>>> @@ -11286,6 +11336,19 @@ comp_ptr_ttypes_real (tree to, tree from, int constp)
>>> to_more_cv_qualified = true;
>>> }
>>> + /* Warn about conversions between pointers to disjoint
>>> + address spaces. */
>>> + if (TREE_CODE (from) == POINTER_TYPE
>>> + && TREE_CODE (to) == POINTER_TYPE)
>>> + {
>>> + addr_space_t as_from = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (from));
>>> + addr_space_t as_to = TYPE_ADDR_SPACE (TREE_TYPE (to));
>>> + addr_space_t as_common;
>>> +
>>> + if (!addr_space_superset (as_to, as_from, &as_common))
>>> + return false;
>>
>> I think you also want to check that as_common == as_to here?
>>
> Yes.
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> if (constp > 0)
>>> constp &= TYPE_READONLY (to);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
>>> index cfbe32afce9..ef75f6b83a2 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
>>> +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
>>> @@ -1448,7 +1448,7 @@ Fixed-point types are supported by the DWARF debug information format.
>>> @section Named Address Spaces
>>> @cindex Named Address Spaces
>>> -As an extension, GNU C supports named address spaces as
>>> +As an extension, GNU C and GNU C++ support named address spaces as
>>> defined in the N1275 draft of ISO/IEC DTR 18037. Support for named
>>> address spaces in GCC will evolve as the draft technical report
>>> changes. Calling conventions for any target might also change. At
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle-addr-space1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle-addr-space1.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..c01f8d6054a
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle-addr-space1.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>>> +// { dg-do run { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>
>> This can be dg-do compile, I don't think you get anything from running an
>> empty main.
>>
> Yes.
>>> +// { dg-options "-fabi-version=8 -Wabi -save-temps" }
>>
>> And then you don't need -save-temps. What are the other options for?
>>
> I forgot to remove -Wabi and -fabi-version, this was from my first
> attempt when I used AS<number> to mangle which changed the ABI. I'll
> remove them.
>>> +// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z1fPU8__seg_fsVi" } }
>>> +
>>> +int f (int volatile __seg_fs *a)
>>> +{
>>> + return *a;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int main () {}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle-addr-space2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle-addr-space2.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..862bbbdcdf2
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/mangle-addr-space2.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>>> +// { dg-do run { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +// { dg-options "-fabi-version=8 -Wabi -save-temps" }
>>
>> Also not clear that running is important for this test.
>>
> Noted.
>>> +// { dg-final { scan-assembler "_Z1fIU8__seg_fsiEiPT_" } }
>>> +
>>> +template <class T>
>>> +int f (T *p) { return *p; }
>>> +int g (__seg_fs int *p) { return *p; }
>>> +__seg_fs int *a;
>>> +int main() { f(a); }
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-decl.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-decl.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..c04d2f497da
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-decl.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +__seg_fs char a, b, c;
>>> +__seg_fs const int *p;
>>> +static /* give internal linkage to the following anonymous struct */
>>
>> Hmm, this 'static' gives internal linkage to the variable q, not the type.
>> What do you want it for?
>>
> Yes, the idea is to give internal linkage to q, otherwise g++
> complains in -std=c++98 mode because q is externally visible but it
> can't be reffered from anywhere else since there is no tag for this
> structure.
Then let's change the comment to /* give internal linkage to q */
>>> +__seg_fs struct { int a; char b; } * __seg_gs q;
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-ops.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-ops.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..86c02d1e7f5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-ops.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +int __seg_fs * fs1;
>>> +int __seg_fs * fs2;
>>> +float __seg_gs * gs1;
>>> +float __seg_gs * gs2;
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> + fs1 + fs2; // { dg-error "invalid operands of types .__seg_fs int.. and .__seg_fs int.. to binary .operator.." }
>>> + fs1 - fs2;
>>> + fs1 - gs2; // { dg-error "invalid operands of types .__seg_fs int.. and .__seg_gs float.. to binary .operator.." }
>>> + fs1 == fs2;
>>> + fs1 != gs2; // { dg-error "comparison between distinct pointer types .__seg_fs int.. and .__seg_gs float.. lacks a cast" }
>>> + fs1 = fs2;
>>> + fs1 = gs2; // { dg-error "cannot convert .__seg_gs float.. to .__seg_fs int.. in assignment" }
>>> + fs1 > fs2;
>>> + fs1 < gs2; // { dg-error "comparison between distinct pointer types .__seg_fs int.. and .__seg_gs float.. lacks a cast" }
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-ref.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-ref.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..12d7975e560
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/addr-space-ref.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +// { dg-prune-output "does not allow .register. storage class specifier" }
>>> +int __seg_fs * outer_b;
>>> +
>>> +struct s {
>>> + __seg_fs int * ok;
>>> + __seg_gs int ko; // { dg-error ".__seg_gs. specified for structure field .ko." }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +int register __seg_fs reg_fs; // { dg-error ".__seg_fs. combined with .register. qualifier for .reg_fs." }
>>> +
>>> +namespace ns_a
>>> +{
>>> + int __seg_fs * inner_b;
>>> +
>>> + template<typename T>
>>> + int f (T &a) { return a; }
>>> + int g (__seg_fs int a) { return a; } // { dg-error ".__seg_fs. specified for parameter .a." }
>>> + int h (__seg_fs int *a) { return *a; }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> + int register __seg_gs reg_gs; // { dg-error ".__seg_gs. combined with .register. qualifier for .reg_gs." }
>>> + static __seg_gs int static_gs;
>>> + __seg_fs int auto_fs; // { dg-error ".__seg_fs. specified for auto variable .auto_fs." }
>>> + __seg_fs int *pa = outer_b;
>>> + __seg_fs int& ra = *ns_a::inner_b;
>>> + return ns_a::f(ra) + ns_a::f(*pa);
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..ebb6316054a
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +
>>> +__seg_fs struct foo; // { dg-error "address space can only be specified for objects and functions" }
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space1.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..2e8ee32a885
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space1.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +// { dg-options "-std=gnu++98" }
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> + struct foo {int a; char b[2];} structure;
>>> + structure = ((__seg_fs struct foo) {1 + 2, 'a', 0}); // { dg-error "compound literal qualified by address-space qualifier" }
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space2.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..5b2c0f28078
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/parse/addr-space2.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +
>>> +__seg_fs __seg_gs int *a; // { dg-error "conflicting named address spaces .__seg_fs vs __seg_gs." }
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-overload.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-overload.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..70dfcce53fa
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-overload.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +
>>> +int __seg_fs * fs1;
>>> +int __seg_gs * gs1;
>>> +
>>> +template<typename T, typename U>
>>> +__seg_fs T* f (T __seg_fs * a, U __seg_gs * b) { return a; }
>>> +template<typename T, typename U>
>>> +__seg_gs T* f (T __seg_gs * a, U __seg_fs * b) { return a; }
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> + f (fs1, gs1);
>>> + f (gs1, fs1);
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-strip1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-strip1.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..5df115db939
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-strip1.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +// { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-std=c++98" "-std=c++03" "-std=gnu++98" "-std=gnu++03" } { "" } }
>>
>> This can be { dg-require-effective-target c++11 }
Or put the x86 requirement in dg-require-effective-target, and put c++11
in the dg-do target spec, either way.
>>> +// decltype is ony available since c++11
>>
>> "only"
>>
>>> +
>>> +int __seg_fs * fs1;
>>> +int __seg_gs * gs1;
>>> +
>>> +template<typename T> struct strip;
>>> +template<typename T> struct strip<__seg_fs T *> { typedef T type; };
>>> +template<typename T> struct strip<__seg_gs T *> { typedef T type; };
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> + *(strip<decltype(fs1)>::type *) fs1 == *(strip<decltype(gs1)>::type *) gs1;
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-strip2.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-strip2.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..526bbaa56b7
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/addr-space-strip2.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +
>>> +int __seg_fs * fs1;
>>> +int __seg_gs * gs1;
>>> +
>>> +template<typename T, typename U>
>>> +bool f (T __seg_fs * a, U __seg_gs * b)
>>> +{
>>> + return *(T *) a == *(U *) b;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int
>>> +main ()
>>> +{
>>> + return f (fs1, gs1);
>>> +}
>>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec-addr-space.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec-addr-space.C
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 00000000000..ae9f4de0e1f
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/spec-addr-space.C
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
>>> +// { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } }
>>> +
>>> +template <class T>
>>> +int f (T __seg_gs *p) { return *p; } // { dg-note "candidate: 'template<class T> int f.__seg_gs T\*." }
>>> + // { dg-note "template argument deduction/substitution failed:" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
>>> +__seg_fs int *a;
>>> +int main() { f(a); } // { dg-error "no matching" }
>>> +// { dg-note "types .__seg_gs T. and .__seg_fs int. have incompatible cv-qualifiers" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
>>> diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
>>> index 9af971cf401..4aebfef854b 100644
>>> --- a/gcc/tree.h
>>> +++ b/gcc/tree.h
>>> @@ -2292,7 +2292,7 @@ extern tree vector_element_bits_tree (const_tree);
>>> /* Encode/decode the named memory support as part of the qualifier. If more
>>> than 8 qualifiers are added, these macros need to be adjusted. */
>>> -#define ENCODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE(NUM) ((NUM & 0xFF) << 8)
>>> +#define ENCODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE(NUM) (((NUM) & 0xFF) << 8)
>>> #define DECODE_QUAL_ADDR_SPACE(X) (((X) >> 8) & 0xFF)
>>> /* Return all qualifiers except for the address space qualifiers. */
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-06 14:34 [RFC] " Paul Iannetta
2022-10-06 17:34 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-09 16:12 ` [PATCH] " Paul Iannetta
2022-10-10 19:20 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-11 22:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Paul Iannetta
2022-10-12 1:49 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-13 0:52 ` Paul Iannetta
2022-10-13 5:46 ` Jakub Jelinek
2022-10-13 15:14 ` Paul Iannetta
2022-10-13 15:02 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-13 15:23 ` Paul Iannetta
2022-10-13 15:47 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-13 16:02 ` Paul Iannetta
2022-10-13 19:41 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-13 21:57 ` Paul Iannetta
2022-10-14 15:19 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-18 7:37 ` [PATCH v3] " Paul Iannetta
2022-10-18 14:24 ` Jason Merrill
2022-10-18 17:01 ` Paul Iannetta
2022-10-19 18:55 ` Jason Merrill [this message]
2022-10-26 7:18 ` Paul Iannetta
2022-10-26 16:28 ` Jason Merrill
2022-11-10 15:42 ` [PATCH v4] " Paul Iannetta
2022-11-03 13:38 ` [PATCH v3] " Georg-Johann Lay
2022-11-10 14:08 ` Paul Iannetta
2022-11-10 16:40 ` Georg-Johann Lay
2022-11-14 17:55 ` Jason Merrill
2022-11-15 12:15 ` Georg-Johann Lay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9ae9538-b465-108d-217d-d1047f9715f5@redhat.com \
--to=jason@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=piannetta@kalrayinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).