public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] c++: Add testcases from some Issaquah DRs
@ 2023-02-14 11:22 Jakub Jelinek
  2023-02-14 11:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2023-02-14 11:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: gcc-patches

Hi!

The following patch adds testcases for 5 DRs.  In the DR2475, DR2530 and
DR2691 my understanding is we already implement the desired behavior,
in DR2478 partially (I've added 2 dg-bogus there, I think we inherit
rather than overwrite DECL_DECLARED_CONSTINIT_P for explicit specialization
somewhere, still far better than clang++) and DR2673 on the other side the
DR was to codify the clang++ behavior rather than GCC.

Not 100% sure if it is better to commit the 2 with dg-bogus or just wait
until the actual fixes are implemented.  BTW, I've noticed
register_specialization does:
              FOR_EACH_CLONE (clone, fn)
                {
                  DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (clone)
                    = DECL_DECLARED_INLINE_P (fn);
                  DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (clone)
                    = DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (fn);
                  DECL_DELETED_FN (clone)
                    = DECL_DELETED_FN (fn);
                }
but not e.g. constexpr/consteval, have tried to cover that in a testcase
but haven't managed to do so.

Tested on x86_64-linux with
GXX_TESTSUITE_STDS=98,11,14,17,20,2b make check-g++ RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} dg.exp=DRs/*.C'
ok for trunk (or ok just for the 1st, 3rd and 5th testcase)?

2023-02-14  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	* g++.dg/DRs/dr2475.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/DRs/dr2478.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/DRs/dr2530.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/DRs/dr2673.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C: New test.

--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2475.C.jj	2023-02-14 10:14:18.300920099 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2475.C	2023-02-14 11:24:38.676314439 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+// DR 2475 - Object declarations of type cv void
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+int f(), x;
+extern void g(),
+  y;                   // { dg-error "variable or field 'y' declared void" }
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2478.C.jj	2023-02-14 10:23:35.487795016 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2478.C	2023-02-14 11:24:49.092162197 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+// DR 2478 - Properties of explicit specializations of implicitly-instantiated class templates
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+template <typename T>
+struct S {
+  int foo () { return 0; }
+  constexpr int bar () { return 0; }
+  int baz () { return 0; }
+  consteval int qux () { return 0; }
+  constexpr S () {}
+  static constinit T x;
+  static T y;
+};
+
+template <typename T>
+T S<T>::x = S<T> ().foo ();	// { dg-error "'constinit' variable 'S<char>::x' does not have a constant initializer" }
+				// { dg-error "call to non-'constexpr' function" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+
+template <typename T>
+T S<T>::y = S<T> ().foo ();
+
+template <>
+constexpr int
+S<int>::foo ()
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+template <>
+int
+S<int>::bar ()
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+template <>
+consteval int
+S<char>::baz ()
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+template <>
+int
+S<char>::qux ()
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+template <>
+long S<long>::x = S<long> ().foo ();	// { dg-bogus "'constinit' variable 'S<long int>::x' does not have a constant initializer" "" { xfail *-*-* } }
+					// { dg-bogus "call to non-'constexpr' function" "" { xfail *-*-* } .-1 }
+
+template <>
+constinit long S<long>::y = S<long> ().foo ();	// { dg-error "'constinit' variable 'S<long int>::y' does not have a constant initializer" }
+						// { dg-error "call to non-'constexpr' function" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+
+constinit auto a = S<char> ().foo ();	// { dg-error "'constinit' variable 'a' does not have a constant initializer" }
+					// { dg-error "call to non-'constexpr' function" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+constinit auto b = S<char> ().bar ();
+constinit auto c = S<int> ().foo ();
+constinit auto d = S<int> ().bar ();	// { dg-error "'constinit' variable 'd' does not have a constant initializer" }
+					// { dg-error "call to non-'constexpr' function" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+constinit auto e = S<char> ().baz ();
+constinit auto f = S<char> ().qux ();	// { dg-error "'constinit' variable 'f' does not have a constant initializer" }
+					// { dg-error "call to non-'constexpr' function" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+constinit auto g = S<int> ().baz ();	// { dg-error "'constinit' variable 'g' does not have a constant initializer" }
+					// { dg-error "call to non-'constexpr' function" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+constinit auto h = S<int> ().qux ();
+auto i = S<char>::x;
+auto j = S<int>::x;
+auto k = S<long>::x;
+auto l = S<char>::y;
+auto m = S<int>::y;
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2530.C.jj	2023-02-14 11:23:14.306547587 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2530.C	2023-02-14 11:25:58.557146894 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// DR 2530 - Multiple definitions of enumerators
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+enum E { e, e };		// { dg-error "redefinition of 'e'" }
+enum F { f = 0, f = 0 };	// { dg-error "redefinition of 'f'" }
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2673.C.jj	2023-02-14 11:38:15.030394220 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2673.C	2023-02-14 11:46:00.262604342 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// DR 2673 - User-declared spaceship vs. built-in operators
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+#include <compare>
+
+enum class E : int { E1, E2 };
+enum class F : int { F1, F2 };
+
+constexpr auto
+operator<=> (E lhs, E rhs)
+{
+  return (int) rhs <=> (int) lhs;
+}
+
+constexpr bool
+operator== (F lhs, F rhs)
+{
+  return (int) lhs != (int) rhs;
+}
+
+static_assert ((E::E1 <=> E::E2) == (1 <=> 0));
+static_assert (E::E1 > E::E2);		// { dg-bogus "static assertion failed" "" { xfail *-*-* } }
+static_assert (F::F1 == F::F2);
+static_assert (!(F::F1 != F::F2));	// { dg-bogus "static assertion failed" "" { xfail *-*-* } }
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C.jj	2023-02-14 11:48:35.841335492 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C	2023-02-14 11:57:21.538669133 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+// DR 2691 - hexadecimal-escape-sequence is too greedy
+// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-require-effective-target wchar }
+// { dg-options "-pedantic" }
+
+extern "C" void abort ();
+
+const char32_t *a = U"\x{20}ab";        // { dg-warning "delimited escape sequences are only valid in" "" { target c++20_down } }
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  if (a[0] != U'\x20' || a[1] != U'a' || a[2] != U'b' || a[3] != U'\0')
+    abort ();
+}

	Jakub


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] c++: Add testcases from some Issaquah DRs
  2023-02-14 11:22 [PATCH] c++: Add testcases from some Issaquah DRs Jakub Jelinek
@ 2023-02-14 11:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
  2023-02-14 22:03   ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2023-02-14 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jason Merrill, gcc-patches

On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 12:22:33PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> 2023-02-14  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C: New test.

Actually, this one isn't a DR, so maybe it should go into:
	* gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/delimited-escape-seq-8.c: New test.
instead.

> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C.jj	2023-02-14 11:48:35.841335492 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C	2023-02-14 11:57:21.538669133 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
> +// DR 2691 - hexadecimal-escape-sequence is too greedy
> +// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
> +// { dg-require-effective-target wchar }
> +// { dg-options "-pedantic" }
> +
> +extern "C" void abort ();
> +
> +const char32_t *a = U"\x{20}ab";        // { dg-warning "delimited escape sequences are only valid in" "" { target c++20_down } }
> +
> +int
> +main ()
> +{
> +  if (a[0] != U'\x20' || a[1] != U'a' || a[2] != U'b' || a[3] != U'\0')
> +    abort ();
> +}

	Jakub


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] c++: Add testcases from some Issaquah DRs
  2023-02-14 11:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
@ 2023-02-14 22:03   ` Jason Merrill
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2023-02-14 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Jelinek, gcc-patches

On 2/14/23 03:33, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 12:22:33PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
>> 2023-02-14  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
>>
>> 	* g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C: New test.
> 
> Actually, this one isn't a DR, so maybe it should go into:
> 	* gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/cpp/delimited-escape-seq-8.c: New test.
> instead.

Sounds good.  Go ahead and commit with that change, the dg-boguses are 
fine.

>> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C.jj	2023-02-14 11:48:35.841335492 +0100
>> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/DRs/dr2691.C	2023-02-14 11:57:21.538669133 +0100
>> @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
>> +// DR 2691 - hexadecimal-escape-sequence is too greedy
>> +// { dg-do run { target c++11 } }
>> +// { dg-require-effective-target wchar }
>> +// { dg-options "-pedantic" }
>> +
>> +extern "C" void abort ();
>> +
>> +const char32_t *a = U"\x{20}ab";        // { dg-warning "delimited escape sequences are only valid in" "" { target c++20_down } }
>> +
>> +int
>> +main ()
>> +{
>> +  if (a[0] != U'\x20' || a[1] != U'a' || a[2] != U'b' || a[3] != U'\0')
>> +    abort ();
>> +}
> 
> 	Jakub
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-14 22:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-14 11:22 [PATCH] c++: Add testcases from some Issaquah DRs Jakub Jelinek
2023-02-14 11:33 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-02-14 22:03   ` Jason Merrill

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).