public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Collison <collison@rivosinc.com>
To: juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai, gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "kito.cheng" <kito.cheng@sifive.com>,
	"kito.cheng" <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
	"richard.sandiford" <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	"richard.guenther" <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vect: Check that vector factor is a compile-time constant
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 12:54:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bcba0435-553a-19d1-721b-3ae5862abb87@rivosinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A89B2A6440C49C96+2023022223274398363343@rivai.ai>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2208 bytes --]

Juzhe,

I disagree with this comment. There are many stakeholders for 
autovectorization and waiting until GCC 14 is not a viable solution for 
us as well as other stakeholders ready to begin work on autovectorization.

As we discussed I have been moving forward with patches for 
autovectorization and am preparing to send them to gcc-patches. This 
assert is preventing code from compiling and needs to be addressed.

If you have a solution in either the RISCV backend or in this file can 
you please present it?

On 2/22/23 10:27, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
> >/gcc/ />//>/* tree-vect-loop-manip.cc (vect_do_peeling): Verify />/that vectorization factor is a compile-time constant. />//>/--- />/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc | 2 +- />/1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) />//>/diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc />/index 6aa3d2ed0bf..1ad1961c788 100644 />/--- a/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc />/+++ b/gcc/tree-vect-loop-manip.cc />/@@ -2930,7 +2930,7 @@ vect_do_peeling (loop_vec_info loop_vinfo, tree />/niters, tree nitersm1, />/niters = vect_build_loop_niters (loop_vinfo, &new_var_p); />//* It's guaranteed that vector loop bound before vectorization is at />/least VF, so set range information for newly generated var. */ />/- if (new_var_p) />/+ if (new_var_p && vf.is_constant ()) />/{ />/value_range vr (type, />/wi::to_wide (build_int_cst (type, vf)),/
>
> I don't think we need to apply this limit in case of RVV 
> auto-vectorization.
> I have talked with Kito and I have a full solution of supporting RVV 
> solution.
>
> We are going to support RVV auto-vectorization in 3 configuration 
> according to RVV ISA spec:
> 1. -march=zve32* support QI and HI auto-vectorization by VNx4QImode 
> and VNx2HImode
> 2. -march=zve64* support QI and HI and SI auto-vectorization by 
> VNx8QImode and VNx4HImode and VNx2SImode
> 3.-march=v* support QI and HI and SI and DI auto-vectorization by 
> VNx16QImode and VNx8HImode and VNx4SImode and VNx2DImode
>
> I will support them in GCC 14. Current loop vectorizer works well for 
> us no need to fix it.
> Thanks.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-22 17:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-22 15:27 juzhe.zhong
2023-02-22 17:54 ` Michael Collison [this message]
2023-02-22 23:43   ` juzhe.zhong
2023-02-22 23:47   ` juzhe.zhong
2023-02-23  4:01   ` Jeff Law
2023-02-23  4:25     ` juzhe.zhong
2023-02-23  4:50     ` Michael Collison
2023-02-24  3:34       ` Jeff Law
2023-02-24  4:04         ` Kito Cheng
2023-03-14 17:48           ` Jeff Law
2023-03-17 16:57             ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-17 16:57               ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-21  2:02               ` juzhe.zhong
2023-03-23 23:18               ` Jeff Law
2023-03-24  2:28                 ` Palmer Dabbelt
2023-03-25 22:45                   ` Jeff Law
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-02-21 23:02 Michael Collison
2023-02-22  8:20 ` Richard Biener
2023-02-22 16:42   ` Michael Collison
2023-02-23  9:08     ` Richard Biener
2023-02-27 14:51   ` Richard Sandiford
2023-03-01 21:00     ` Michael Collison
2023-03-02  7:56       ` Richard Biener

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bcba0435-553a-19d1-721b-3ae5862abb87@rivosinc.com \
    --to=collison@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@sifive.com \
    --cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).