* [PATCH] c++: Reject pack expansion of assume attribute [PR109756]
@ 2023-05-09 8:22 Jakub Jelinek
2023-05-09 13:59 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Jelinek @ 2023-05-09 8:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Merrill; +Cc: gcc-patches
Hi!
http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.attr#grammar-4 says
"In an attribute-list, an ellipsis may appear only if that attribute's
specification permits it."
and doesn't explicitly permit it on any standard attribute.
The https://wg21.link/p1774r8 paper which introduced assume attribute says
"We could therefore hypothetically permit the assume attribute to directly
support pack expansion:
template <int... args>
void f() {
[[assume(args >= 0)...]];
}
However, we do not propose this. It would require substantial additional work
for a very rare use case. Note that this can instead be expressed with a fold
expression, which is equivalent to the above and works out of the box without
any extra effort:
template <int... args>
void f() {
[[assume(((args >= 0) && ...))]];
}
", but as the testcase shows, GCC 13+ ICEs on assume attribute followed by
... if it contains packs.
The following patch rejects those instead of ICE and for C++17 or later
suggests using fold expressions instead (it doesn't make sense to suggest
it for C++14 and earlier when we'd error on the fold expressions).
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk/13.2?
2023-05-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
PR c++/109756
* gp-gimplify.cc (process_stmt_assume_attribute): Diagnose pack
expansion of assume attribute.
* g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume11.C: New test.
--- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc.jj 2023-05-04 12:13:50.791647593 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc 2023-05-08 13:20:33.191070530 +0200
@@ -3267,6 +3267,16 @@ process_stmt_assume_attribute (tree std_
for (; attr; attr = lookup_attribute ("gnu", "assume", TREE_CHAIN (attr)))
{
tree args = TREE_VALUE (attr);
+ if (args && PACK_EXPANSION_P (args))
+ {
+ auto_diagnostic_group d;
+ error_at (attrs_loc, "pack expansion of %qE attribute",
+ get_attribute_name (attr));
+ if (cxx_dialect >= cxx17)
+ inform (attrs_loc, "use fold expression in the attribute "
+ "argument instead");
+ continue;
+ }
int nargs = list_length (args);
if (nargs != 1)
{
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume11.C.jj 2023-05-08 13:19:07.812290213 +0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume11.C 2023-05-08 13:22:07.746719746 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+// PR c++/109756
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+template <int ...args>
+void
+foo ()
+{
+ [[assume (1 > 0)...]]; // { dg-error "expansion pattern '\\\(1 > 0\\\)' contains no parameter packs" }
+ // { dg-warning "attributes at the beginning of statement are ignored" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+ [[assume (args > 0)...]]; // { dg-error "pack expansion of 'assume' attribute" }
+ // { dg-message "use fold expression in the attribute argument instead" "" { target c++17 } .-1 }
+#if __cpp_fold_expressions >= 201603L
+ [[assume (((args > 0) && ...))]];
+#endif
+ [[gnu::assume (1 > 0)...]]; // { dg-error "expansion pattern '\\\(1 > 0\\\)' contains no parameter packs" }
+ // { dg-warning "attributes at the beginning of statement are ignored" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
+ [[gnu::assume (args > 0)...]]; // { dg-error "pack expansion of 'assume' attribute" }
+ // { dg-message "use fold expression in the attribute argument instead" "" { target c++17 } .-1 }
+#if __cpp_fold_expressions >= 201603L
+ [[gnu::assume (((args > 0) && ...))]];
+#endif
+}
Jakub
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: Reject pack expansion of assume attribute [PR109756]
2023-05-09 8:22 [PATCH] c++: Reject pack expansion of assume attribute [PR109756] Jakub Jelinek
@ 2023-05-09 13:59 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2023-05-09 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Jelinek; +Cc: gcc-patches
On 5/9/23 04:22, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://eel.is/c++draft/dcl.attr#grammar-4 says
> "In an attribute-list, an ellipsis may appear only if that attribute's
> specification permits it."
> and doesn't explicitly permit it on any standard attribute.
> The https://wg21.link/p1774r8 paper which introduced assume attribute says
> "We could therefore hypothetically permit the assume attribute to directly
> support pack expansion:
> template <int... args>
> void f() {
> [[assume(args >= 0)...]];
> }
> However, we do not propose this. It would require substantial additional work
I question "substantial"; it could easily be treated as a
fold-expression internally. But the patch is OK.
> for a very rare use case. Note that this can instead be expressed with a fold
> expression, which is equivalent to the above and works out of the box without
> any extra effort:
> template <int... args>
> void f() {
> [[assume(((args >= 0) && ...))]];
> }
> ", but as the testcase shows, GCC 13+ ICEs on assume attribute followed by
> ... if it contains packs.
> The following patch rejects those instead of ICE and for C++17 or later
> suggests using fold expressions instead (it doesn't make sense to suggest
> it for C++14 and earlier when we'd error on the fold expressions).
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk/13.2?
>
> 2023-05-09 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
>
> PR c++/109756
> * gp-gimplify.cc (process_stmt_assume_attribute): Diagnose pack
> expansion of assume attribute.
>
> * g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume11.C: New test.
>
> --- gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc.jj 2023-05-04 12:13:50.791647593 +0200
> +++ gcc/cp/cp-gimplify.cc 2023-05-08 13:20:33.191070530 +0200
> @@ -3267,6 +3267,16 @@ process_stmt_assume_attribute (tree std_
> for (; attr; attr = lookup_attribute ("gnu", "assume", TREE_CHAIN (attr)))
> {
> tree args = TREE_VALUE (attr);
> + if (args && PACK_EXPANSION_P (args))
> + {
> + auto_diagnostic_group d;
> + error_at (attrs_loc, "pack expansion of %qE attribute",
> + get_attribute_name (attr));
> + if (cxx_dialect >= cxx17)
> + inform (attrs_loc, "use fold expression in the attribute "
> + "argument instead");
> + continue;
> + }
> int nargs = list_length (args);
> if (nargs != 1)
> {
> --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume11.C.jj 2023-05-08 13:19:07.812290213 +0200
> +++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/attr-assume11.C 2023-05-08 13:22:07.746719746 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
> +// PR c++/109756
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +template <int ...args>
> +void
> +foo ()
> +{
> + [[assume (1 > 0)...]]; // { dg-error "expansion pattern '\\\(1 > 0\\\)' contains no parameter packs" }
> + // { dg-warning "attributes at the beginning of statement are ignored" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
> + [[assume (args > 0)...]]; // { dg-error "pack expansion of 'assume' attribute" }
> + // { dg-message "use fold expression in the attribute argument instead" "" { target c++17 } .-1 }
> +#if __cpp_fold_expressions >= 201603L
> + [[assume (((args > 0) && ...))]];
> +#endif
> + [[gnu::assume (1 > 0)...]]; // { dg-error "expansion pattern '\\\(1 > 0\\\)' contains no parameter packs" }
> + // { dg-warning "attributes at the beginning of statement are ignored" "" { target *-*-* } .-1 }
> + [[gnu::assume (args > 0)...]]; // { dg-error "pack expansion of 'assume' attribute" }
> + // { dg-message "use fold expression in the attribute argument instead" "" { target c++17 } .-1 }
> +#if __cpp_fold_expressions >= 201603L
> + [[gnu::assume (((args > 0) && ...))]];
> +#endif
> +}
>
> Jakub
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-09 13:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-09 8:22 [PATCH] c++: Reject pack expansion of assume attribute [PR109756] Jakub Jelinek
2023-05-09 13:59 ` Jason Merrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).