* [PATCH] c++: noexcept-spec from nested class confusion [PR109761]
@ 2023-05-09 16:35 Patrick Palka
2023-05-09 17:36 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Patrick Palka @ 2023-05-09 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: jason, Patrick Palka
When processing a noexcept-spec from a nested class after completion of
the outer class (since a noexcept-spec is a complete-class context), we
pass to noexcept_override_late_checks the outer class type instead of
the nested class type, which leads to bogus errors in the below test.
This patch fixes this by making noexcept_override_late_checks obtain the
class context directly via DECL_CONTEXT instead of via an additional
parameter.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this looK OK
for trunk and release branches?
PR c++/109761
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* parser.cc (cp_parser_class_specifier): Adjust call to
noexcept_override_late_checks.
(noexcept_override_late_checks): Remove 'type' parameter
and use DECL_CONTEXT of 'fndecl' instead.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/parser.cc | 13 ++++++-------
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C | 16 ++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index d89553e7da8..7f4bc0f468e 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static cp_token_cache *cp_token_cache_new
static tree cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier
(cp_parser *, tree);
static void noexcept_override_late_checks
- (tree, tree);
+ (tree);
static void cp_parser_initial_pragma
(cp_token *);
@@ -26458,7 +26458,7 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
/* The finish_struct call above performed various override checking,
but it skipped unparsed noexcept-specifier operands. Now that we
have resolved them, check again. */
- noexcept_override_late_checks (type, decl);
+ noexcept_override_late_checks (decl);
/* Remove any member-function parameters from the symbol table. */
pop_injected_parms ();
@@ -28240,14 +28240,13 @@ cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier (cp_parser *parser, tree default_arg)
}
/* Perform late checking of overriding function with respect to their
- noexcept-specifiers. TYPE is the class and FNDECL is the function
- that potentially overrides some virtual function with the same
- signature. */
+ noexcept-specifiers. FNDECL is the member function that potentially
+ overrides some virtual function with the same signature. */
static void
-noexcept_override_late_checks (tree type, tree fndecl)
+noexcept_override_late_checks (tree fndecl)
{
- tree binfo = TYPE_BINFO (type);
+ tree binfo = TYPE_BINFO (DECL_CONTEXT (fndecl));
tree base_binfo;
if (DECL_STATIC_FUNCTION_P (fndecl))
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e8156eb7c6f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+// PR c++/109761
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+
+struct base {
+ virtual void foo() noexcept { }
+ virtual ~base() { }
+};
+
+struct outer : base {
+ struct nested {
+ void foo() noexcept(noexcept(g())); // { dg-bogus "looser" }
+ ~nested() noexcept(noexcept(g())); // { dg-bogus "looser" }
+ };
+ static void g();
+};
+
--
2.40.1.476.g69c786637d
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] c++: noexcept-spec from nested class confusion [PR109761]
2023-05-09 16:35 [PATCH] c++: noexcept-spec from nested class confusion [PR109761] Patrick Palka
@ 2023-05-09 17:36 ` Jason Merrill
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Merrill @ 2023-05-09 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick Palka, gcc-patches
On 5/9/23 12:35, Patrick Palka wrote:
> When processing a noexcept-spec from a nested class after completion of
> the outer class (since a noexcept-spec is a complete-class context), we
> pass to noexcept_override_late_checks the outer class type instead of
> the nested class type, which leads to bogus errors in the below test.
>
> This patch fixes this by making noexcept_override_late_checks obtain the
> class context directly via DECL_CONTEXT instead of via an additional
> parameter.
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this looK OK
> for trunk and release branches?
OK.
> PR c++/109761
>
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
>
> * parser.cc (cp_parser_class_specifier): Adjust call to
> noexcept_override_late_checks.
> (noexcept_override_late_checks): Remove 'type' parameter
> and use DECL_CONTEXT of 'fndecl' instead.
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C: New test.
> ---
> gcc/cp/parser.cc | 13 ++++++-------
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> index d89553e7da8..7f4bc0f468e 100644
> --- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static cp_token_cache *cp_token_cache_new
> static tree cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier
> (cp_parser *, tree);
> static void noexcept_override_late_checks
> - (tree, tree);
> + (tree);
>
> static void cp_parser_initial_pragma
> (cp_token *);
> @@ -26458,7 +26458,7 @@ cp_parser_class_specifier (cp_parser* parser)
> /* The finish_struct call above performed various override checking,
> but it skipped unparsed noexcept-specifier operands. Now that we
> have resolved them, check again. */
> - noexcept_override_late_checks (type, decl);
> + noexcept_override_late_checks (decl);
>
> /* Remove any member-function parameters from the symbol table. */
> pop_injected_parms ();
> @@ -28240,14 +28240,13 @@ cp_parser_late_noexcept_specifier (cp_parser *parser, tree default_arg)
> }
>
> /* Perform late checking of overriding function with respect to their
> - noexcept-specifiers. TYPE is the class and FNDECL is the function
> - that potentially overrides some virtual function with the same
> - signature. */
> + noexcept-specifiers. FNDECL is the member function that potentially
> + overrides some virtual function with the same signature. */
>
> static void
> -noexcept_override_late_checks (tree type, tree fndecl)
> +noexcept_override_late_checks (tree fndecl)
> {
> - tree binfo = TYPE_BINFO (type);
> + tree binfo = TYPE_BINFO (DECL_CONTEXT (fndecl));
> tree base_binfo;
>
> if (DECL_STATIC_FUNCTION_P (fndecl))
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..e8156eb7c6f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp0x/noexcept78.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +// PR c++/109761
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +
> +struct base {
> + virtual void foo() noexcept { }
> + virtual ~base() { }
> +};
> +
> +struct outer : base {
> + struct nested {
> + void foo() noexcept(noexcept(g())); // { dg-bogus "looser" }
> + ~nested() noexcept(noexcept(g())); // { dg-bogus "looser" }
> + };
> + static void g();
> +};
> +
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-09 17:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-09 16:35 [PATCH] c++: noexcept-spec from nested class confusion [PR109761] Patrick Palka
2023-05-09 17:36 ` Jason Merrill
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).