public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
To: HAO CHEN GUI <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	David <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, Peter Bergner <bergner@linux.ibm.com>,
	gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5, rs6000] Change mode and insn condition for VSX scalar extract/insert instructions
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:47:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cba514af-60f7-c760-7de4-66ebe630ea02@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a63fac98-4737-3f8d-44d9-92874ed814d6@linux.ibm.com>

Hi Haochen,

Thanks for the update, some comments are inlined as below.

on 2022/12/2 15:03, HAO CHEN GUI wrote:
> Hi,
>   For scalar extract/insert instructions, exponent field can be stored in a
> 32-bit register. So this patch changes the mode of exponent field from DI to
> SI so that these instructions can be generated in a 32-bit environment. Also
> it removes TARGET_64BIT check for these instructions.
> 
>   The instructions using DI registers can be invoked with -mpowerpc64 in a
> 32-bit environment. The patch changes insn condition from TARGET_64BIT to
> TARGET_POWERPC64 for those instructions.
> 
>   This patch also changes prototypes and catagories of relevant built-ins and
                                           ~~~~~ categories
> effective target checks of test cases.
> 
>   Compared to last version, main changes are to remove 64-bit environment
> requirement for relevant built-ins in extend.texi. And to change the type of
> arguments of relevant built-ins in rs6000-overload.def.
> 
>   Bootstrapped and tested on powerpc64-linux BE and LE with no regressions.
> Is this okay for trunk? Any recommendations? Thanks a lot.
> 
> ChangeLog
> 2022-12-01  Haochen Gui  <guihaoc@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> gcc/
> 	* config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> 	(__builtin_vsx_scalar_extract_exp): Set return type to const unsigned
> 	int and move it from power9-64 to power9 catatlog.
                                                 ~~~~~~~ catalog
> 	(__builtin_vsx_scalar_extract_sig): Set return type to const unsigned
> 	long long.
> 	(__builtin_vsx_scalar_insert_exp): Set type of second argument to
> 	unsigned int.
> 	(__builtin_vsx_scalar_insert_exp_dp): Set type of second argument to
> 	unsigned int and move it from power9-64 to power9 catatlog.
                                                          ~~~~~~~ 

> 	* config/rs6000/vsx.md (xsxexpdp): Set mode of first operand to
> 	SImode.  Remove TARGET_64BIT from insn condition.
> 	(xsxsigdp): Change insn condition from TARGET_64BIT to TARGET_POWERPC64.
> 	(xsiexpdp): Change insn condition from TARGET_64BIT to
> 	TARGET_POWERPC64.  Set mode of third operand to SImode.
> 	(xsiexpdpf): Set mode of third operand to SImode.  Remove TARGET_64BIT
> 	from insn condition.
> 	* config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
> 	(__builtin_vec_scalar_insert_exp): Set type of second argument to
> 	unsigned int.
> 	* doc/extend.texi (scalar_insert_exp): Set type of second argument to
> 	unsigned int and remove 64-bit environment requirement when
> 	significand has a float type.
> 	(scalar_extract_exp): Remove 64-bit environment requirement.
> 
> gcc/testsuite/
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-0.c: Remove lp64 check.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-1.c: Remove lp64 check.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-2.c: Deleted as the case is
> 	invalid now.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-6.c: Replace lp64 check
> 	with has_arch_ppc64.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-0.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-6.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-0.c: Replace lp64 check
> 	with has_arch_ppc64. Set type of exponent to unsigned int.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-1.c: Set type of exponent
> 	to unsigned int.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-12.c: Replace lp64 check
> 	with has_arch_ppc64. Set type of exponent to unsigned int.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-13.c: Remove lp64 check.
> 	Set type of exponent to unsigned int.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-2.c: Set type of exponent to
> 	unsigned int.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-3.c: Remove lp64 check. Set
> 	type of exponent to unsigned int.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-4.c: Likewise.
> 	* gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-5.c: Deleted as the case is
> 	invalid now.
> 
> patch.diff
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> index f76f54793d7..d8d67fa0cad 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtins.def
> @@ -2833,6 +2833,11 @@
>    const signed int __builtin_dtstsfi_ov_td (const int<6>, _Decimal128);
>      TSTSFI_OV_TD dfptstsfi_unordered_td {}
> 
> +  const unsigned int __builtin_vsx_scalar_extract_exp (double);
> +    VSEEDP xsxexpdp {}
> +
> +  const double __builtin_vsx_scalar_insert_exp_dp (double, unsigned int);
> +    VSIEDPF xsiexpdpf {}

This __builtin_vsx_scalar_insert_exp_dp still requires 64-bit, see further
explanation below ...

> 
>  [power9-64]
>    void __builtin_altivec_xst_len_r (vsc, void *, long);
> @@ -2847,19 +2852,13 @@
>    pure vsc __builtin_vsx_lxvl (const void *, signed long);
>      LXVL lxvl {}
> 
> -  const signed long __builtin_vsx_scalar_extract_exp (double);
> -    VSEEDP xsxexpdp {}
> -
> -  const signed long __builtin_vsx_scalar_extract_sig (double);
> +  const unsigned long long __builtin_vsx_scalar_extract_sig (double);
>      VSESDP xsxsigdp {}
> 
>    const double __builtin_vsx_scalar_insert_exp (unsigned long long, \
> -                                                unsigned long long);
> +						unsigned int);
>      VSIEDP xsiexpdp {}
> 
> -  const double __builtin_vsx_scalar_insert_exp_dp (double, unsigned long long);
> -    VSIEDPF xsiexpdpf {}
> -
>    pure vsc __builtin_vsx_xl_len_r (void *, signed long);
>      XL_LEN_R xl_len_r {}
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
> index 44e2945aaa0..8220d85271f 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-overload.def
> @@ -4507,9 +4507,9 @@
>      VSESQP
> 
>  [VEC_VSIE, scalar_insert_exp, __builtin_vec_scalar_insert_exp]
> -  double __builtin_vec_scalar_insert_exp (unsigned long long, unsigned long long);
> +  double __builtin_vec_scalar_insert_exp (unsigned long long, unsigned int);
>      VSIEDP
> -  double __builtin_vec_scalar_insert_exp (double, unsigned long long);
> +  double __builtin_vec_scalar_insert_exp (double, unsigned int);
>      VSIEDPF
>    _Float128 __builtin_vec_scalar_insert_exp (unsigned __int128, unsigned long long);
>      VSIEQP
> diff --git a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
> index e226a93bbe5..9d3a2340a79 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/rs6000/vsx.md
> @@ -5095,10 +5095,10 @@ (define_insn "xsxexpqp_<mode>"
> 
>  ;; VSX Scalar Extract Exponent Double-Precision
>  (define_insn "xsxexpdp"
> -  [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> -	(unspec:DI [(match_operand:DF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
> +  [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
> +	(unspec:SI [(match_operand:DF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
>  	 UNSPEC_VSX_SXEXPDP))]
> -  "TARGET_P9_VECTOR && TARGET_64BIT"
> +  "TARGET_P9_VECTOR"
>    "xsxexpdp %0,%x1"
>    [(set_attr "type" "integer")])
> 
> @@ -5116,7 +5116,7 @@ (define_insn "xsxsigdp"
>    [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "register_operand" "=r")
>  	(unspec:DI [(match_operand:DF 1 "vsx_register_operand" "wa")]
>  	 UNSPEC_VSX_SXSIG))]
> -  "TARGET_P9_VECTOR && TARGET_64BIT"
> +  "TARGET_P9_VECTOR && TARGET_POWERPC64"
>    "xsxsigdp %0,%x1"
>    [(set_attr "type" "integer")])
> 
> @@ -5145,9 +5145,9 @@ (define_insn "xsiexpqp_<mode>"
>  (define_insn "xsiexpdp"
>    [(set (match_operand:DF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
>  	(unspec:DF [(match_operand:DI 1 "register_operand" "r")
> -		    (match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "r")]
> +		    (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r")]
>  	 UNSPEC_VSX_SIEXPDP))]
> -  "TARGET_P9_VECTOR && TARGET_64BIT"
> +  "TARGET_P9_VECTOR && TARGET_POWERPC64"
>    "xsiexpdp %x0,%1,%2"
>    [(set_attr "type" "fpsimple")])
> 
> @@ -5155,9 +5155,9 @@ (define_insn "xsiexpdp"
>  (define_insn "xsiexpdpf"
>    [(set (match_operand:DF 0 "vsx_register_operand" "=wa")
>  	(unspec:DF [(match_operand:DF 1 "register_operand" "r")
> -		    (match_operand:DI 2 "register_operand" "r")]
> +		    (match_operand:SI 2 "register_operand" "r")]
>  	 UNSPEC_VSX_SIEXPDP))]
> -  "TARGET_P9_VECTOR && TARGET_64BIT"
> +  "TARGET_P9_VECTOR"
>    "xsiexpdp %x0,%1,%2"
>    [(set_attr "type" "fpsimple")])

... the final instruction xsiexpdp, as its description:

src1 <- GPR[RA]  // operand 1, 
src2 <- GPR[RB]
VSR[32×TX+T].dword[0].bit[0] <- src1.bit[0]
VSR[32×TX+T].dword[0].bit[1:11] <- src2.bit[53:63]
VSR[32×TX+T].dword[0].bit[12:63] <- src1.bit[12:63]  // it requires src1 should be 64 bits
VSR[32×TX+T].dword[1] <- 0x0000_0000_0000_0000 

Without TARGET_POWERPC64, we have to put the operand 1 into
two separated GPRs, but only one GPR used by this instruction,
the final result would be wrong.

> 
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> index 7fe7f8817cd..cdadcfeb40e 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
> @@ -19552,8 +19552,8 @@ unsigned long long int scalar_extract_sig (double source);
>  unsigned __int128 scalar_extract_sig (__ieee128 source);
> 
>  double scalar_insert_exp (unsigned long long int significand,
> -                          unsigned long long int exponent);
> -double scalar_insert_exp (double significand, unsigned long long int exponent);
> +			  unsigned int exponent);
> +double scalar_insert_exp (double significand, unsigned int exponent);
> 
>  ieee_128 scalar_insert_exp (unsigned __int128 significand,
>                              unsigned long long int exponent);
> @@ -19573,7 +19573,9 @@ bool scalar_test_neg (double source);
>  bool scalar_test_neg (__ieee128 source);
>  @end smallexample
> 
> -The @code{scalar_extract_exp} and @code{scalar_extract_sig}
> +The @code{scalar_extract_exp}
> +functions require an environment supporting ISA 3.0 or later.

This change looks wrong, as the @code{scalar_extract_exp} functions in the context
include both functions below:

  unsigned int scalar_extract_exp (double source);
  unsigned long long int scalar_extract_exp (__ieee128 source);

The former doesn't requires 64-bit but the latter still requires (since IEEE128_HW
requires 64-bit).

So how about something like:
"The @code{scalar_extract_exp} function with 64-bit source argument
require an environment supporting ISA 3.0 or later.
The @code{scalar_extract_exp} with 128-bit source argument and
@code{scalar_extract_sig} functions require a 64-bit environment
supporting ISA 3.0 or later.
"

This documentation update reminds me of that the current prototype of __ieee128
variant can be:

  unsigned int scalar_extract_exp (__ieee128 source);

type unsigned int is enough for the exponent.  It means xsxexpqp_<mode> can also
use SImode rather than DImode.

> +The @code{scalar_extract_sig}
>  functions require a 64-bit environment supporting ISA 3.0 or later.
>  The @code{scalar_extract_exp} and @code{scalar_extract_sig} built-in
>  functions return the significand and the biased exponent value
> @@ -19591,8 +19593,10 @@ returned from the @code{scalar_extract_sig} function.  Use the
>  @code{scalar_test_neg} function to test the sign of its @code{double}
>  argument.
> 
> -The @code{scalar_insert_exp}
> +The @code{scalar_insert_exp} with an integer @code{significand}
>  functions require a 64-bit environment supporting ISA 3.0 or later.
> +The @code{scalar_insert_exp} with a float @code{significand}
> +functions require an environment supporting ISA 3.0 or later.
>  When supplied with a 64-bit first argument, the
>  @code{scalar_insert_exp} built-in function returns a double-precision
>  floating point value that is constructed by assembling the values of its
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-0.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-0.c
> index 35bf1b240f3..a97a2b6ec98 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-0.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-0.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
> -/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */

I noticed that some of updated test cases remove "{ target { powerpc*-*-* } } "
from dg-do, but some don't (like closely following scalar-extract-exp-1.c).
IMHO, we should keep consistent here, in this bucket we still have other
scalar-* untouched, I prefer to keep it unchanged.  Sorry that I didn't catch
this in the previous review.

>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> 
> -/* This test should succeed only on 64-bit configurations.  */
>  #include <altivec.h>
> 
>  unsigned int
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-1.c
> index 9737762c1d4..1cb438f9b70 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-1.c
> @@ -1,9 +1,7 @@
>  /* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
>  /* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power8" } */
> 
> -/* This test should succeed only on 64-bit configurations.  */
>  #include <altivec.h>
> 
>  unsigned int
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-2.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-2.c
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 53b67c95cf9..00000000000
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-2.c
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
> -/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target ilp32 } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> -/* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> -
> -/* This test only runs on 32-bit configurations, where a compiler error
> -   should be issued because this builtin is not available on
> -   32-bit configurations.  */
> -
> -#include <altivec.h>
> -
> -unsigned int
> -get_exponent (double *p)
> -{
> -  double source = *p;
> -
> -  return scalar_extract_exp (source);	/* { dg-error "'__builtin_vsx_scalar_extract_exp' requires the" } */
> -}
> -
> -
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-6.c
> index b9dd7d61aae..136471a35b3 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-6.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-exp-6.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> -/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */

It gets rid of 64-bit env, why do we need has_arch_ppc64 here? ...

> +/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */
> 
>  /* This test should succeed only on 64-bit configurations.  */

... the comment is wrong if has_arch_ppc64 is not intentional.

>  #include <altivec.h>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-0.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-0.c
> index 637080652b7..3be7eb13566 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-0.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-0.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> -/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> 
>  /* This test should succeed only on 64-bit configurations.  */
>  #include <altivec.h>

Missing to update scalar-extract-sig-1.c?  It should use "has_arch_ppc64" instead.

> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-6.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-6.c
> index c85072da138..b96a745157d 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-6.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-extract-sig-6.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> -/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */
> 
>  /* This test should succeed only on 64-bit configurations.  */
>  #include <altivec.h>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-0.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-0.c
> index d8243258a67..7e70d6e2642 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-0.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-0.c
> @@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
> -/* { dg-do compile { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target powerpc_p9vector_ok } */
> 
>  /* This test should succeed only on 64-bit configurations.  */
>  #include <altivec.h>
> 
>  double
>  insert_exponent (unsigned long long int *significand_p,
> -		 unsigned long long int *exponent_p)
> +		 unsigned int *exponent_p)
>  {
>    unsigned long long int significand = *significand_p;
> -  unsigned long long int exponent = *exponent_p;
> +  unsigned int exponent = *exponent_p;
> 
>    return scalar_insert_exp (significand, exponent);
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-1.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-1.c
> index 8260b107178..a7297319bc4 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-1.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-1.c
> @@ -8,10 +8,10 @@
> 
>  double
>  insert_exponent (unsigned long long int *significand_p,
> -		 unsigned long long int *exponent_p)
> +		 unsigned int *exponent_p)
>  {
>    unsigned long long int significand = *significand_p;
> -  unsigned long long int exponent = *exponent_p;
> +  unsigned int exponent = *exponent_p;
> 
>    return __builtin_vec_scalar_insert_exp (significand, exponent); /* { dg-error "'__builtin_vsx_scalar_insert_exp' requires" } */
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-12.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-12.c
> index 384fc9cc675..343620fbe17 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-12.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-12.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
> -/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target has_arch_ppc64 } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */
> 
>  /* This test should succeed only on 64-bit configurations.  */
>  #include <altivec.h>
> @@ -9,10 +9,10 @@
> 
>  double
>  insert_exponent (unsigned long long int *significand_p,
> -		 unsigned long long int *exponent_p)
> +		 unsigned int *exponent_p)
>  {
>    unsigned long long int significand = *significand_p;
> -  unsigned long long int exponent = *exponent_p;
> +  unsigned int exponent = *exponent_p;
> 
>    return scalar_insert_exp (significand, exponent);
>  }
> @@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ main ()
>  {
>    unsigned long long int significand_1 = 0x18000000000000LL;
>    unsigned long long int significand_2 = 0x1a000000000000LL;
> -  unsigned long long int exponent_1 = 62 + BIAS_FOR_DOUBLE_EXP;
> -  unsigned long long int exponent_2 = 49 + BIAS_FOR_DOUBLE_EXP;
> +  unsigned int exponent_1 = 62 + BIAS_FOR_DOUBLE_EXP;
> +  unsigned int exponent_2 = 49 + BIAS_FOR_DOUBLE_EXP;
> 
>    double x = (double) (0x1800ULL << 50);
>    double z = (double) (0x1a00ULL << 37);
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-13.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-13.c
> index 0e004224277..6c3b1ccd523 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-13.c
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/bfp/scalar-insert-exp-13.c
> @@ -1,18 +1,16 @@
> -/* { dg-do run { target { powerpc*-*-* } } } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target lp64 } */
> -/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */
> +/* { dg-do run } */
>  /* { dg-options "-mdejagnu-cpu=power9" } */
> +/* { dg-require-effective-target p9vector_hw } */

As the comment above, this scalar_insert_exp variant needs has_arch_ppc64,
the others need to be updated accordingly.

BR,
Kewen

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-08  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-02  7:03 HAO CHEN GUI
2022-12-08  8:47 ` Kewen.Lin [this message]
2022-12-12  3:23   ` HAO CHEN GUI
2022-12-12 10:23     ` Kewen.Lin
2022-12-12 16:21 ` Segher Boessenkool

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cba514af-60f7-c760-7de4-66ebe630ea02@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=bergner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=guihaoc@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).