* [PATCH] docs: add cavear for __builtin_cpu_supports
@ 2023-02-09 10:35 Martin Liška
2023-02-09 10:43 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin Liška @ 2023-02-09 10:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Gerald Pfeifer
Document that the function does not work correctly for old
VIA processors.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
PR target/100758
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/extend.texi: Document that the function
does not work correctly for old VIA processors.
---
gcc/doc/extend.texi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
index 5a026c4b48c..2aedf6dfe69 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/extend.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/extend.texi
@@ -22071,6 +22071,9 @@ else
count = generic_countbits (n); //generic implementation.
@}
@end smallexample
+
+Caveat: The built-in function does not work correctly on old VIA
+processors (Centaur family).
@end deftypefn
The following built-in functions are made available by @option{-mmmx}.
--
2.39.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] docs: add cavear for __builtin_cpu_supports
2023-02-09 10:35 [PATCH] docs: add cavear for __builtin_cpu_supports Martin Liška
@ 2023-02-09 10:43 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2023-02-09 10:50 ` Martin Liška
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2023-02-09 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Martin Liška; +Cc: gcc-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 356 bytes --]
On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Martin Liška wrote:
> Document that the function does not work correctly for old VIA
> processors.
Thanks for doing this, Martin!
> +Caveat: The built-in function does not work correctly on old VIA
> +processors (Centaur family).
Maybe say "This built-in function...", though that's a nuance. The patch
is okay either way.
Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] docs: add cavear for __builtin_cpu_supports
2023-02-09 10:43 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2023-02-09 10:50 ` Martin Liška
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Martin Liška @ 2023-02-09 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gerald Pfeifer; +Cc: gcc-patches
On 2/9/23 11:43, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Feb 2023, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Document that the function does not work correctly for old VIA
>> processors.
>
> Thanks for doing this, Martin!
>
>> +Caveat: The built-in function does not work correctly on old VIA
>> +processors (Centaur family).
>
> Maybe say "This built-in function...", though that's a nuance. The patch
> is okay either way.
Thanks for review, I've just pushed it with the suggestion.
Martin
>
> Gerald
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-02-09 10:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-02-09 10:35 [PATCH] docs: add cavear for __builtin_cpu_supports Martin Liška
2023-02-09 10:43 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2023-02-09 10:50 ` Martin Liška
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).