From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>,
Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: nd <nd@arm.com>, Richard Sandiford <Richard.Sandiford@arm.com>,
Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] machine descriptor: New compact syntax for insn and insn_split in Machine Descriptions.
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:33:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <df1c066a-e735-1a87-47da-0bc3a25b255e@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ad4bfc89-3c61-3857-d232-4875df151d8d@arm.com>
On 08/06/2023 11:29, Richard Earnshaw (lists) via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On 08/06/2023 11:12, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> On Jun 08 2023, Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -713,6 +714,183 @@ you can use @samp{*} inside of a @samp{@@}
>>> multi-alternative template:
>>> @end group
>>> @end smallexample
>>> +@node Compact Syntax
>>> +@section Compact Syntax
>>> +@cindex compact syntax
>>> +
>>> +In cases where the number of alternatives in a @code{define_insn} or
>>> +@code{define_insn_and_split} are large then it may be beneficial to
>>> use the
>>
>> is large
>>
>
> Or perhaps better still:
>
> When a define_insn or define_insn_and split has many alternatives it may
> be beneficial to ...
>
> R.
Or perhaps even s/many/multiple/. It doesn't have to have very many to
make this new syntax preferable, IMO.
R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 10:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-18 16:30 [PATCH] RFC: " Tamar Christina
2023-04-21 17:18 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-24 8:33 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-16 13:56 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2023-04-24 9:05 ` Tamar Christina
2023-04-24 9:37 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-06-05 13:51 ` [PATCH v2] machine descriptor: " Tamar Christina
2023-06-05 20:35 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-06-06 7:47 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-06-06 12:00 ` Tamar Christina
2023-06-06 12:49 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-06-06 16:13 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2023-06-08 9:58 ` Tamar Christina
2023-06-08 10:12 ` Andreas Schwab
2023-06-08 10:29 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists)
2023-06-08 10:33 ` Richard Earnshaw (lists) [this message]
2023-06-08 14:24 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-06-08 16:49 ` Mikael Morin
2023-06-13 15:26 ` Tamar Christina
2023-06-14 19:41 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-06-15 6:24 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=df1c066a-e735-1a87-47da-0bc3a25b255e@arm.com \
--to=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=Tamar.Christina@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).