From: Andrew MacLeod <amacleod@redhat.com>
To: Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Richard Sandiford <Richard.Sandiford@arm.com>
Cc: Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, "jlaw@ventanamicro.com" <jlaw@ventanamicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: Fix wrong overmatching of div-bitmask by using new optabs [PR108583]
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 11:41:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef23b5a2-1b3a-d961-6ec8-f8ef5c4756b7@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e13eb62e-f29d-d32e-4b99-8acff0a3905b@redhat.com>
On 2/15/23 13:42, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
> On 2/15/23 12:50, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>
>> On 2/15/23 12:13, Tamar Christina wrote:
>>>> On 2/15/23 07:51, Tamar Christina wrote:
>> void
>> operator_plus::wi_fold (irange &r, tree type,
>> const wide_int &lh_lb, const wide_int &lh_ub,
>> const wide_int &rh_lb, const wide_int &rh_ub)
>> const
>> {
>> wi::overflow_type ov_lb, ov_ub;
>> signop s = TYPE_SIGN (type);
>>
>> // Do whatever wideint magic is required to do this adds in higher
>> precision
>> wide_int new_lb = wi::add (lh_lb, rh_lb, s, &ov_lb);
>> wide_int new_ub = wi::add (lh_ub, rh_ub, s, &ov_ub);
>>
>> r = int_range<2> (type, new_lb, new_ub);
>> }
>>
>>
>> The operator needs to be registered, I've attached the skeleton for
>> it. you should just have to finish implementing wi_fold().
>>
>> in theory :-)
>>
> You also mentioned earlier that some were tree codes, some were
> internal function calls? We have some initial support for built in
> functions, but I am not familiar with all the various forms they can
> take. We currently support CFN_ functions in
>
> gimple-range-op.cc, gimple_range_op_handler::maybe_builtin_call ()
>
> Basically this is part of a "gimple_range_op_handler" wrapper for
> range-ops which can provide a range-ops class for stmts that don't map
> to a binary or unary form.. such as built in functions.
>
> If you get to the point where you need this for a builtin function, I
> can help you through that too. Although someone may have to also help
> me through what differentiates the different kinds of internal
> function :-) I presume they are all similar in some way.
>
> Andrew
>
Oh yeah, and in case you haven't figured it out on your own, you'll have
to remove WIDEN_MULT_EXPR from the range-ops init table. This
non-standard mechanism only gets checked if there is no standard
range-op table entry for the tree code :-P
Andrew
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-22 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-09 17:16 Tamar Christina
2023-02-09 17:22 ` [PATCH 2/2]AArch64 Update div-bitmask to implement new optab instead of target hook [PR108583] Tamar Christina
2023-02-10 10:35 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-10 14:10 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-10 10:34 ` [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: Fix wrong overmatching of div-bitmask by using new optabs [PR108583] Tamar Christina
2023-02-10 13:13 ` Richard Biener
2023-02-10 13:36 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-10 13:52 ` Richard Biener
2023-02-10 14:13 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-10 14:30 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-10 14:54 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-27 11:09 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-27 12:11 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-27 12:14 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-27 21:33 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-27 22:10 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-28 11:08 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-28 11:12 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-28 12:03 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-03-01 11:30 ` Richard Biener
2023-02-10 15:56 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-10 16:09 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-10 16:25 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-10 16:33 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-10 16:57 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-10 17:01 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-10 17:14 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-10 18:12 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-02-10 18:34 ` Richard Biener
2023-02-10 20:58 ` Andrew MacLeod
2023-02-13 9:54 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-15 12:51 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-15 16:05 ` Andrew MacLeod
2023-02-15 17:13 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-15 17:50 ` Andrew MacLeod
2023-02-15 18:42 ` Andrew MacLeod
2023-02-22 12:51 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-22 16:41 ` Andrew MacLeod [this message]
2023-02-22 18:03 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-22 18:33 ` Andrew MacLeod
2023-02-23 8:36 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-23 16:39 ` Andrew MacLeod
2023-02-23 16:56 ` Tamar Christina
2023-03-01 16:57 ` Andrew Carlotti
2023-03-01 18:16 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-22 13:06 ` Tamar Christina
2023-02-22 15:19 ` Andrew MacLeod
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ef23b5a2-1b3a-d961-6ec8-f8ef5c4756b7@redhat.com \
--to=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=Richard.Sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=Tamar.Christina@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jlaw@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).