public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
To: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com>
Cc: Andrea Corallo via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"Richard Earnshaw" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/12 V2] arm: Add option -mbranch-protection
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2022 11:27:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <gkr8rp99qi8.fsf_-_@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7599346b-1015-7dae-88a6-f7c8a8d82c98@foss.arm.com> (Richard Earnshaw's message of "Fri, 1 Jul 2022 11:59:06 +0100")

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2284 bytes --]

Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com> writes:

[...]

> +@item
> +-mbranch-protection=@var{none}|@var{standard}|@var{pac-ret}[+@var{leaf}][+@var{bti}]|@var{bti}[+@var{pac-ret}[+@var{leaf}]]
> +@opindex mbranch-protection
> +Enable branch protection features (armv8.1-m.main only).
> +@samp{none} generate code without branch protection or return address
> +signing.
> +@samp{standard[+@var{leaf}]} generate code with all branch protection
> +features enabled at their standard level.
> +@samp{pac-ret[+@var{leaf}]} generate code with return address signing
> +set to its standard level, which is to sign all functions that save
> +the return address to memory.
> +@samp{leaf} When return address signing is enabled, also sign leaf
> +functions even if they do not write the return address to memory.
> ++@samp{bti} Add landing-pad instructions at the permitted targets of
> +indirect branch instructions.
> +
> +If the @samp{+pacbti} architecture extension is not enabled, then all
> +branch protection and return address signing operations are
> +constrained to use only the instructions defined in the
> +architectural-NOP space. The generated code will remain
> +backwards-compatible with earlier versions of the architecture, but
> +the additional security can be enabled at run time on processors that
> +support the @samp{PACBTI} extension.
> +
> +Branch target enforcement using BTI can only be enabled at runtime if
> +all code in the application has been compiled with at least
> +@samp{-mbranch-protection=bti}.
> +
> +The default is to generate code without branch protection or return
> +address signing.
>
> This needs to make it clear that -mbranch-protection != none is only
> supported on armv8-m.main or later.
>
> R.

Hi Richard,

thanks for reviewing, please find attached the respinned patch.

Ok for trunk (when the rest of the series will be approved)?

Best Regards

  Andrea

gcc/ChangeLog:

	* config/arm/arm.c (arm_configure_build_target): Parse and validate
	-mbranch-protection option and initialize appropriate data structures.
	* config/arm/arm.opt (-mbranch-protection): New option.
	* doc/invoke.texi (Arm Options): Document it.

Co-Authored-By: Tejas Belagod  <tbelagod@arm.com>
Co-Authored-By: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>


[-- Attachment #2: 3-12.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3690 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
index 60f3eae82a4..0068817b0f2 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.cc
@@ -3263,6 +3263,17 @@ arm_configure_build_target (struct arm_build_target *target,
       tune_opts = strchr (opts->x_arm_tune_string, '+');
     }
 
+  if (opts->x_arm_branch_protection_string)
+    {
+      aarch_validate_mbranch_protection (opts->x_arm_branch_protection_string);
+
+      if (aarch_ra_sign_key != AARCH_KEY_A)
+	{
+	  warning (0, "invalid key type for %<-mbranch-protection=%>");
+	  aarch_ra_sign_key = AARCH_KEY_A;
+	}
+    }
+
   if (arm_selected_arch)
     {
       arm_initialize_isa (target->isa, arm_selected_arch->common.isa_bits);
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm.opt b/gcc/config/arm/arm.opt
index f54ec8356c3..d292e23ea11 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm.opt
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm.opt
@@ -323,6 +323,10 @@ mbranch-cost=
 Target RejectNegative Joined UInteger Var(arm_branch_cost) Init(-1)
 Cost to assume for a branch insn.
 
+mbranch-protection=
+Target RejectNegative Joined Var(arm_branch_protection_string) Save
+Use branch-protection features.
+
 mgeneral-regs-only
 Target RejectNegative Mask(GENERAL_REGS_ONLY) Save
 Generate code which uses the core registers only (r0-r14).
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 079e34ed98c..a2be3446594 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
@@ -825,7 +825,9 @@ Objective-C and Objective-C++ Dialects}.
 -mcmse @gol
 -mfix-cmse-cve-2021-35465 @gol
 -mstack-protector-guard=@var{guard} -mstack-protector-guard-offset=@var{offset} @gol
--mfdpic}
+-mfdpic @gol
+-mbranch-protection=@var{none}|@var{standard}|@var{pac-ret}[+@var{leaf}]
+[+@var{bti}]|@var{bti}[+@var{pac-ret}[+@var{leaf}]]}
 
 @emph{AVR Options}
 @gccoptlist{-mmcu=@var{mcu}  -mabsdata  -maccumulate-args @gol
@@ -21521,6 +21523,40 @@ The opposite @option{-mno-fdpic} option is useful (and required) to
 build the Linux kernel using the same (@code{arm-*-uclinuxfdpiceabi})
 toolchain as the one used to build the userland programs.
 
+@item
+-mbranch-protection=@var{none}|@var{standard}|@var{pac-ret}[+@var{leaf}][+@var{bti}]|@var{bti}[+@var{pac-ret}[+@var{leaf}]]
+@opindex mbranch-protection
+Enable branch protection features (armv8.1-m.main only).
+@samp{none} generate code without branch protection or return address
+signing.
+@samp{standard[+@var{leaf}]} generate code with all branch protection
+features enabled at their standard level.
+@samp{pac-ret[+@var{leaf}]} generate code with return address signing
+set to its standard level, which is to sign all functions that save
+the return address to memory.
+@samp{leaf} When return address signing is enabled, also sign leaf
+functions even if they do not write the return address to memory.
++@samp{bti} Add landing-pad instructions at the permitted targets of
+indirect branch instructions.
+
+If the @samp{+pacbti} architecture extension is not enabled, then all
+branch protection and return address signing operations are
+constrained to use only the instructions defined in the
+architectural-NOP space. The generated code will remain
+backwards-compatible with earlier versions of the architecture, but
+the additional security can be enabled at run time on processors that
+support the @samp{PACBTI} extension.
+
+Branch target enforcement using BTI can only be enabled at runtime if
+all code in the application has been compiled with at least
+@samp{-mbranch-protection=bti}.
+
+Any setting other than @samp{none} is supported only on armv8-m.main
+or later.
+
+The default is to generate code without branch protection or return
+address signing.
+
 @end table
 
 @node AVR Options

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-28  8:39 [PATCH 0/12] arm: Enables return address verification and branch target identification on Cortex-M Andrea Corallo
2022-04-28  9:08 ` [PATCH 1/12] arm: Make mbranch-protection opts parsing common to AArch32/64 Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 10:49   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-04-28  9:37 ` [PATCH 2/12] arm: Add Armv8.1-M Mainline target feature +pacbti Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 10:51   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-04-28  9:38 ` [PATCH 3/12] arm: Add option -mbranch-protection Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 10:59   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-04  9:27     ` Andrea Corallo [this message]
2022-07-04 10:55       ` [PATCH 3/12 V2] " Richard Earnshaw
2022-04-28  9:40 ` [PATCH 4/12] arm: Add testsuite library support for PACBTI target Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 13:03   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-01 14:17     ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-04 14:47       ` Andrea Corallo
2022-07-05 10:05         ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-04-28  9:42 ` [PATCH 5/12] arm: Implement target feature macros for PACBTI Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 14:26   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-12 15:45     ` [PATCH 5/12 V2] " Andrea Corallo
2022-07-21 11:01       ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-22 10:35         ` [PATCH 5/12 V3] " Andrea Corallo
2022-07-22 14:34           ` [PATCH 5/12 V4] " Andrea Corallo
2022-04-28  9:44 ` [PATCH 6/12] arm: Add pointer authentication for stack-unwinding runtime Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 14:41   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-11-09 11:17     ` [PATCH 6/12 V2] " Andrea Corallo
2022-04-28  9:45 ` [PATCH 7/12] arm: Emit build attributes for PACBTI target feature Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 14:49   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-13  8:58     ` [PATCH 7/12 V2] " Andrea Corallo
2022-07-21 11:03       ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-22 14:57     ` Andrea Corallo
2022-04-28  9:46 ` [PATCH 8/12] arm: Introduce multilibs " Andrea Corallo
2022-06-01 12:32   ` [PATCH 8/12 V2] " Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 14:54     ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-01 14:57       ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-21  9:04         ` [PATCH 8/12 V3] " Andrea Corallo
2022-07-21 11:09           ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-04-28  9:48 ` [PATCH 9/12] arm: Make libgcc bti compatible Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 15:03   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-21  9:17     ` [PATCH 9/12 V2] " Andrea Corallo
2022-07-21 11:41       ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-07-22 15:09         ` Andrea Corallo
2022-07-25 10:41           ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-12-12 14:54             ` Andrea Corallo
2022-04-28  9:50 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm: Implement cortex-M return signing address codegen Andrea Corallo
2022-06-28  9:17   ` [PATCH 10/12 V2] " Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 15:43     ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-08-08  9:33       ` Andrea Corallo
2022-10-20 14:53         ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2022-04-28  9:51 ` [PATCH 11/12] aarch64: Make bti pass generic so it can be used by the arm backend Andrea Corallo
2022-05-06  8:23   ` Richard Sandiford
2022-07-01 15:53   ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-04-28  9:53 ` [PATCH 12/12] arm: implement bti injection Andrea Corallo
2022-06-28  9:21   ` [PATCH 12/12 V2] " Andrea Corallo
2022-07-01 16:04     ` Richard Earnshaw
2022-06-01 12:34 ` [PATCH 0/12] arm: Enables return address verification and branch target identification on Cortex-M Andrea Corallo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=gkr8rp99qi8.fsf_-_@arm.com \
    --to=andrea.corallo@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=Richard.Earnshaw@foss.arm.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).