Re: libgcj/1596

Re: libgcj/1596

[warrenl]

The following reply was made to PR libgcj/1596; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: warrenl@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, jeff.sturm@commerceone.com, warrenl@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libgcj/1596
Date: 10 Jan 2001 09:47:18 -0000

 Synopsis: setScale() missing from java.math.BigDecimal
 
 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback
 State-Changed-By: warrenl
 State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 10 01:47:18 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Checked in a patch.  
     Jeff, please confirm you're satisfied with the patch and I'll
     close the PR.
 
 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1596&database=gcc
>From webmaster@systema.ru Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: webmaster@systema.ru
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: c/1979: GCC-20010122 not compiled on alpha osf5.1
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010214133048.31789.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg01257.html
Content-length: 645

>Number:         1979
>Category:       c
>Synopsis:       GCC-20010122 not compiled on alpha osf5.1
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Wed Feb 14 05:36:02 PST 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Paul
>Release:        GCC-20010122 (2.97)
>Organization:
>Environment:
Compaq AlphaServer EV5.6 (21164A), Tru64 UNIX 5.1, bison-1.28, user root
>Description:
./configure > conf.log 2>&1
make > make.log 2>&1

like #1793
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:

Re: libgcj/1596

[warrenl]

The following reply was made to PR libgcj/1596; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: warrenl@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, jeff.sturm@commerceone.com, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  warrenl@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: libgcj/1596
Date: 10 Jan 2001 01:37:54 -0000

 Synopsis: setScale() missing from java.math.BigDecimal
 
 Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->warrenl
 Responsible-Changed-By: warrenl
 Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan  9 17:37:54 2001
 Responsible-Changed-Why:
     Author.
 State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 State-Changed-By: warrenl
 State-Changed-When: Tue Jan  9 17:37:54 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     I've looked at this and know what needs to be done.
 
 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1596&database=gcc
>From apbianco@cygnus.com Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
To: apbianco@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/2400: Linked list don't compile
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010327205601.12833.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg02616.html
Content-length: 553

The following reply was made to PR java/2400; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexandre Petit-Bianco <apbianco@cygnus.com>
To: torsten.rueger@firsthop.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/2400: Linked list don't compile
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:49:41 -0800 (PST)

 torsten.rueger@firsthop.com writes:
 
 > A simple linked list adding , written tightly like (obj.next =
 > before).prev = (obj.prev = before.prev).next = obj; will core dump
 > gcj
 
 Have you tried the patch I wrote for java/2066? I gets me past the
 compilation.
 
 ./A