Re: c++/1773

Re: c++/1773

[gdr]

The following reply was made to PR c++/1773; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: gdr@gcc.gnu.org
To: bkoz@redhat.com, pme@sourceware.cygnus.com, Jens.Maurer@gmx.net,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gdr@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1773
Date: 25 Jan 2001 22:58:57 -0000

 Synopsis: __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L
 
 Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->gdr
 Responsible-Changed-By: gdr
 Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jan 25 14:58:57 2001
 Responsible-Changed-Why:
     Analyzed
 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->suspended
 State-Changed-By: gdr
 State-Changed-When: Thu Jan 25 14:58:57 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     This is a known issue.  Defining a standard conforming value
     for __cplusplus happens to break V3 owns implementation.
     
     This issue will addressed later.  Thanks for your report.
     
     -- Gaby
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1773&database=gcc
>From David.Osborne@nottingham.ac.uk Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: David Osborne <David.Osborne@nottingham.ac.uk>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/1811
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010130165606.8352.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00820.html
Content-length: 1440

The following reply was made to PR c/1811; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Osborne <David.Osborne@nottingham.ac.uk>
To: neil@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/1811
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:53:24 +0000

 False alarm: it turns out that the system on which I was working has a
 faulty disk and the source file which was causing the `problem' seems to
 lie on one or more defective blocks and is itself unreadable. Sorry to
 have wasted your time.
 
 On Tue, Jan 30 2001 at 16:42:06 -0000, neil@gcc.gnu.org wrote
 > Synopsis: gcc (cpp0) fails when compiling BIND 8.2.3
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: neil
 > State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 30 08:42:05 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Would you please check if this happens with CVS GCC, or
 >     a recent snapshot?
 >     That version of CPP was quite buggy and I doubt CVS CPP will segfault.  It is hard for me to check your report,
 >     since you cannot provide preprocessed source (obviously),
 >     and I cannot easily reproduce your setup.
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1811&database=gcc
 
 -- 
 David Osborne                         david.osborne@nottingham.ac.uk
 Academic Computing Services     phone/voicemail: +44 (0)115 951 3397
 The University of Nottingham                fax: +44 (0)115 951 3358
 Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK          http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~cczdao/
>From nathan@gcc.gnu.org Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/1656
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010119202600.26455.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg00497.html
Content-length: 599

The following reply was made to PR c++/1656; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1656
Date: 19 Jan 2001 20:19:41 -0000

 Synopsis: gcc incorrectly accepts template syntax on non-template class
 
 Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->nathan
 Responsible-Changed-By: nathan
 Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jan 19 12:19:41 2001
 Responsible-Changed-Why:
     patch in progress
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1656&database=gcc
>From lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/881
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010208080600.5305.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg01045.html
Content-length: 487

The following reply was made to PR c++/881; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, harinath@cs.umn.edu, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/881
Date: 8 Feb 2001 08:00:15 -0000

 Synopsis: ICE in tree_low_cst
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 State-Changed-By: lerdsuwa
 State-Changed-When: Thu Feb  8 00:00:15 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Confirm as a bug.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=881&database=gcc
>From mdejong@cygnus.com Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: Mo DeJong <mdejong@cygnus.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/1877
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010214101601.29398.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg01248.html
Content-length: 1017

The following reply was made to PR c++/1877; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mo DeJong <mdejong@cygnus.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1877
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 02:13:14 -0800 (PST)

 I ran into this problem as well.
 
 class IEEEfloat
 {
 private:
     static const int MIN_INT     = 0x80000000;
     static const int MAX_INT     = 0x7FFFFFFF;
 public:
     int         IntValue(void);
 };
 
 //const int IEEEfloat::MIN_INT;
 //const int IEEEfloat::MAX_INT;
 
 int IEEEfloat::IntValue()
 {
     int i = 0;
     return i ? MIN_INT : MAX_INT;
 }
 
 int main() {}
 
 
 Produces:
 
 % g++ -o run const_mem.cpp
 /tmp/ccCPWycH.o: In function `IEEEfloat::IntValue()   ':
 /tmp/ccCPWycH.o(.text+0x14): undefined reference to 
 `IEEEfloat::MAX_INT    '
 /tmp/ccCPWycH.o(.text+0x21): undefined reference to 
 `IEEEfloat::MIN_INT    '
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 
 This is with gcc 3.0, from Feb 14, 2001.
 
 Uncommenting the external defs "fixes" the problem.
 
 Mo DeJong
 Red Hat Inc