Re: optimization/463

Re: optimization/463

[rth]

The following reply was made to PR optimization/463; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: rth@gcc.gnu.org
To: Farrell.McKay@bullant.com, Farrell.McKay@wayfarer.com.au,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/463
Date: 14 Feb 2001 23:56:40 -0000

 Synopsis: Optimizer wrongly eliminates code block
 
 State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
 State-Changed-By: rth
 State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 14 15:56:40 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     No feedback.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=463&database=gcc

Re: optimization/463

[rth]

The following reply was made to PR optimization/463; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: rth@gcc.gnu.org
To: Farrell.McKay@bullant.com, Farrell.McKay@wayfarer.com.au,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, rth@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/463
Date: 16 Jan 2001 14:47:45 -0000

 Synopsis: Optimizer wrongly eliminates code block
 
 Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->rth
 Responsible-Changed-By: rth
 Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Jan 16 06:47:45 2001
 Responsible-Changed-Why:
     Mine.
 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 State-Changed-By: rth
 State-Changed-When: Tue Jan 16 06:47:45 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Your attachment got cropped.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=463&database=gcc
>From rodrigc@mediaone.net Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 2001
From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c++/1951
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2001 00:00:00 -0000
Message-id: <20010217184601.14254.qmail@sourceware.cygnus.com>
X-SW-Source: 2001-q1/msg01354.html
Content-length: 609

The following reply was made to PR c++/1951; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, rpm@carbonkernel.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
   rodrigc@mediaone.net
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1951
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:38:13 -0500

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1951&database=gcc
 
 Tested this with:
 gcc version 2.97 20010211 (experimental)
 from: http://www.codesourcery.com/gcc-snapshots/
 
 Did not cause an internal compiler error.
 
 Should this be closed?
 --
 Craig Rodrigues
 http://www.gis.net/~craigr
 rodrigc@mediaone.net