Re: java/1414

Re: java/1414

[bryce]

The following reply was made to PR java/1414; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: bryce@gcc.gnu.org
To: apbianco@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, mdejong@cygnus.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/1414
Date: 3 Mar 2001 04:27:51 -0000

 Old Synopsis: duplicate switch label problems
 New Synopsis: Failure to detect duplicate switch labels when generating bytecode
 
 State-Changed-From-To: closed->open
 State-Changed-By: bryce
 State-Changed-When: Fri Mar  2 20:27:51 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Oops. Mo reports that this problem does still occur when 
     generating bytecode.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1414&database=gcc

Re: java/1414

[Bryce McKinlay]

The following reply was made to PR java/1414; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Bryce McKinlay <bryce@waitaki.otago.ac.nz>
To: Mo DeJong <mdejong@cygnus.com>
Cc: bryce@gcc.gnu.org, apbianco@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/1414
Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2001 17:33:29 +1300

 Mo DeJong wrote:
 
 > On 3 Mar 2001 bryce@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 >
 > > Synopsis: duplicate switch label problems
 >
 > Are you sure that is fixed? The test case would only fail
 > when -C was passed. The error in your "Confirmed" message
 > passed the -c flag, which was generating an error before.
 
 You're right. I'm re-opening the PR and updating the synopsis to reflect
 that is a bytecode specific problem.
 
 regards
 
   [ bryce ]
 
 

Re: java/1414

[bryce]

The following reply was made to PR java/1414; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: bryce@gcc.gnu.org
To: apbianco@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, mdejong@cygnus.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: java/1414
Date: 3 Mar 2001 02:01:55 -0000

 Synopsis: duplicate switch label problems
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 State-Changed-By: bryce
 State-Changed-When: Fri Mar  2 18:01:55 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Confirmed fixed in the gcc 3.0 branch. GCJ now reports the
     correct error for this test case:
     
     $ gcj -c T1410d1.java 
     T1410d1.java: In class `T1410d1':
     T1410d1.java: In method `T1410d1.foo(int)':
     T1410d1.java:5: Duplicate case label: `0'.
                           case 0:
                           ^
     1 error
     
     Thank you for the bug report.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1414&database=gcc

Re: java/1414

[Mo DeJong]

The following reply was made to PR java/1414; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Mo DeJong <mdejong@cygnus.com>
To: bryce@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: apbianco@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: java/1414
Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2001 20:19:32 -0800 (PST)

 On 3 Mar 2001 bryce@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 
 > Synopsis: duplicate switch label problems
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
 > State-Changed-By: bryce
 > State-Changed-When: Fri Mar  2 18:01:55 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     Confirmed fixed in the gcc 3.0 branch. GCJ now reports the
 >     correct error for this test case:
 >     
 >     $ gcj -c T1410d1.java 
 >     T1410d1.java: In class `T1410d1':
 >     T1410d1.java: In method `T1410d1.foo(int)':
 >     T1410d1.java:5: Duplicate case label: `0'.
 >                           case 0:
 >                           ^
 >     1 error
 >     
 >     Thank you for the bug report.
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1414&database=gcc
 
 
 Are you sure that is fixed? The test case would only fail
 when -C was passed. The error in your "Confirmed" message
 passed the -c flag, which was generating an error before.
 
 Mo DeJong
 Red Hat Inc