Re: c++/1094

Re: c++/1094

[rodrigc]

The following reply was made to PR c++/1094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
To: dave@syncinc.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1094
Date: 25 May 2001 05:16:24 -0000

 Synopsis: Build error on RedHat 7.0 Linux
 
 State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
 State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 State-Changed-When: Thu May 24 22:16:23 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     - Newer POSE snapshots build under gcc 3.0
     - preprocessed source of problem not provided
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1094&database=gcc

Re: c++/1094

[Dave Finnegan]

The following reply was made to PR c++/1094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dave Finnegan <dfinnegan@synchronicity.com>
To: jdennett@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, dave@syncinc.com
Subject: Re: c++/1094
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 13:51:43 -0400

 Whoa! A blast from the past!
 
 I have long since given up on Red Hat.
 
 Cheers,
 Dave
 
 James Dennett wrote:
 
 > Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1094&database=gcc
 > 
 > I've just built a current POSE with a recent gcc (2001-05-02) on 
 > Linux/x86, and apart from numerous coding errors in POSE I found no 
 > problems with the compiler.  Preprocessed source showing your problem 
 > would still be helpful, as anything which makes gcc crash is important.  
 > It would also be nice to know which version of gcc you found the problem 
 > with; note that RedHat 7.0 ships with an unofficial version of gcc which 
 > is not supported by the FSF.
 > 
 > Note that without access to the exact source code which caused your 
 > problem (preferably in pre-processed form) there is almost no chance of 
 > a gcc developer being able to reproduce your problem.  We/they would 
 > love to investigate this, but cannot go any further without more 
 > information.
 > 
 > http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html gives some more information 
 > which may help.
 > 
 > We (I!) would appreciate it if you are able to provide more information.
 > 
 > Regards,
 > 
 > James Dennett
 
 
 -- 
   Dave Finnegan                             Synchronicity, Inc.
   845.986.6121                              dave@synchronicity.com
 

Re: c++/1094

[James Dennett]

The following reply was made to PR c++/1094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: James Dennett <james@evtechnology.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, dave@syncinc.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1094
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 17:26:26 +0000

 Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1094&database=gcc
 
 I've just built a current POSE with a recent gcc (2001-05-02) on 
 Linux/x86, and apart from numerous coding errors in POSE I found no 
 problems with the compiler.  Preprocessed source showing your problem 
 would still be helpful, as anything which makes gcc crash is important.  
 It would also be nice to know which version of gcc you found the problem 
 with; note that RedHat 7.0 ships with an unofficial version of gcc which 
 is not supported by the FSF.
 
 Note that without access to the exact source code which caused your 
 problem (preferably in pre-processed form) there is almost no chance of 
 a gcc developer being able to reproduce your problem.  We/they would 
 love to investigate this, but cannot go any further without more 
 information.
 
 http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/bugs.html gives some more information 
 which may help.
 
 We (I!) would appreciate it if you are able to provide more information.
 
 Regards,
 
 James Dennett
 

Re: c++/1094

[mmitchel]

The following reply was made to PR c++/1094; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org
To: dave@syncinc.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/1094
Date: 22 Feb 2001 21:56:21 -0000

 Synopsis: Build error on RedHat 7.0 Linux
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 State-Changed-By: mmitchel
 State-Changed-When: Thu Feb 22 13:56:21 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     Unreproducable.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=1094&database=gcc