Re: c++/2914

Re: c++/2914

[nathan]

The following reply was made to PR c++/2914; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org, tot@trema.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2914
Date: 26 May 2001 19:37:45 -0000

 Synopsis: gcc 3.0 crashes on xalan DoubleSupport.cpp
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
 State-Changed-By: nathan
 State-Changed-When: Sat May 26 12:37:45 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     confirmed as a regression -- well, actually 2.95 emitted
     some diagnostics, but I think that's irrelevant.
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2914&database=gcc

Re: c++/2914

[nathan]

The following reply was made to PR c++/2914; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: nathan@gcc.gnu.org
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nathan@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
  tot@trema.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/2914
Date: 27 May 2001 15:17:56 -0000

 Synopsis: gcc 3.0 crashes on xalan DoubleSupport.cpp
 
 Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->nathan
 Responsible-Changed-By: nathan
 Responsible-Changed-When: Sun May 27 08:17:55 2001
 Responsible-Changed-Why:
     This is a possible defect in the standard. I attach a stripped
     down test case. The problem is the union declared in
     positiveInfinity's definition. What scope should that be
     put into?
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2914&database=gcc