Re: libstdc++/2071

[Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>]

The following reply was made to PR libstdc++/2071; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Phil Edwards <pedwards@disaster.jaj.com>
To: rittle@labs.mot.com
Cc: bkoz@redhat.com, mark@codesourcery.com, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: libstdc++/2071
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 18:15:39 -0400

 In two different messages, Loren James Rittle wrote:
 > Phil reported ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2001-06/msg00071.html )
 > that it didn't work for him on Solaris 2.8, but I am not convinced yet
 > that it wasn't something minor (and/or the insidious Makefile problem
 > - I don't know Phil's habits when it comes to applying a patch and
 > attempting a rebuild in an already bootstrapped tree
 
 My habits usually involve 'rm -rf' at a couple of points, since we aren't
 explicitly tracking dependencies yet.  Automake helps, but you never know.
 
 
 > Patch applied to mainline and 3.0 branch.  I will close it in GNATS on
 > Wednesday assuming no issues surface.
 
 Cool.  I'm just now getting to a computer and reading all my mail, including
 this GNATS thread.  I'll test the patch on my sol8 box just for kicks this
 evening, and will report, but don't hold things up on my account.
 
 
 Phil
 
 -- 
 pedwards at disaster dot jaj dot com  |  pme at sources dot redhat dot com
 devphil at several other less interesting addresses in various dot domains
 The gods do not protect fools.  Fools are protected by more capable fools.