public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: optimization/2938: [Regression vs 2.95] Optimization with -O1causes near infinite time
@ 2001-06-25 6:16 Wolfgang Bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2001-06-25 6:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mmitchel; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR optimization/2938; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/2938: [Regression vs 2.95] Optimization with -O1
causes near infinite time
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:59:57 +0200 (MET DST)
> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
> Fixed.
Dear Mark,
thanks for looking into it. However, in the 3.0 release your fix seems to
not be working: for c++615, which is kind of a small form of
optimization/2938, I still get 1009 calls to Point::operator() (which is,
as you said, not only a problem of optimization, but also a correctness
issue as the operator is not marked constant). This is both on Sun
Solaris2.7 and Linux.
Optimization/2938 still takes infintely long. I double checked, but my
gcc3 sources have your patch to the problem incorporated. Do you know what
is going on?
Regards
Wolfgang
var/gcc-bugs> c++ -v
Reading specs from
/home/people/wolf/Config/gcc-ss-sun/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.7/3.0/specs
Configured with: ../gcc-3.0/configure
--prefix=/home/people/wolf/Config/gcc-ss-sun --with-gnu-as
--with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/local/bin/ld
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.0
var/gcc-bugs> c++ -O1 -S 0615+.cc
var/gcc-bugs> cat 0615+.s | c++filt | grep operator | uniq
call Point::operator()(unsigned), 0
var/gcc-bugs> cat 0615+.s | c++filt | grep operator | wc -l
1009
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
www: http://gaia.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/~wolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: optimization/2938: [Regression vs 2.95] Optimization with -O1causes near infinite time
@ 2001-07-02 7:26 Wolfgang Bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2001-07-02 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mmitchel; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR optimization/2938; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org" <mmitchel@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
"gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: optimization/2938: [Regression vs 2.95] Optimization with -O1
causes near infinite time
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:21:11 +0200 (MET DST)
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> I have just checked in a patch that I think will really work this time.
> Would you check that it fixes the problem for you, and then tell me
> which PRs I can close?
It indeed does this time :-) optimization/2938 is already closed, but
c++/615 isn't, so please close that. (615 was the original report, 2938
was kind of a re-post that showed the problem in a more pronounced way).
Many thanks & best regards
Wolfgang
PS: Checked on Solaris2.7 and Linux.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
www: http://gaia.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/~wolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: optimization/2938: [Regression vs 2.95] Optimization with -O1causes near infinite time
@ 2001-06-25 23:46 Wolfgang Bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2001-06-25 23:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mmitchel; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR optimization/2938; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: "gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: optimization/2938: [Regression vs 2.95] Optimization with -O1
causes near infinite time
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:42:01 +0200 (MET DST)
> >> State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
> >> Fixed.
> >
> > Dear Mark,
> > thanks for looking into it.
>
> I will investigate.
You may want to use the appended tiny program for the regression test
suite or for debugging. If it helps, I can as well file another bug report
with a more suitable name (please propose one) so that c++/615 and
optimization/2938 can be closed.
Regards
Wolfgang
-----------------------------------------
// compile with -O1
#include <assert.h>
// assert that foo() is only called once
int count = 0;
double foo () {
count++;
return 0;
};
double bar () {
const double x[1] = { foo() };
return x[0];
};
int main ()
{
bar();
assert (count == 1);
};
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: wolfgang.bangerth@iwr.uni-heidelberg.de
www: http://gaia.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/~wolf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2001-07-02 7:26 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-06-25 6:16 optimization/2938: [Regression vs 2.95] Optimization with -O1causes near infinite time Wolfgang Bangerth
2001-06-25 23:46 Wolfgang Bangerth
2001-07-02 7:26 Wolfgang Bangerth
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).